Loading…

Polaris Inc.PIICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

Makes off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles and boats, including the Indian Motorcycle and RZR brands.

Momentum neutral 54
Mkt cap
$3.59B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$52.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
22.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
+18 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
88 days
2 Feb 2027
Close · USD$63.07
1D-1.9%
1W+6.2%
1M+19.4%
3M-9.6%
6M-7.6%
YTD-0.3%
1Y-3.9%
ATR %4.1%
Beta1.31
52w lowhigh19.1% off high

What Polaris does

Makes off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles and boats, including the Indian Motorcycle and RZR brands.

Sells vehicles to independent dealers and books revenue when dealers take delivery, so dealer stock levels move its results as much as retail demand. Parts, garments, accessories and financing support add smaller streams. Off-road vehicles and snowmobiles are the established core, with buying concentrated in the riding and snow seasons.

Products and services

  • Off-road vehicles (RZR, Ranger, Sportsman)
  • Snowmobiles
  • Indian Motorcycle
  • Boats (Bennington, Godfrey)

Customers

  • Powersports dealers across North America

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Powersports vehicles
  • Off-road/snow/marine vehicle…

What could go right

  • Outdoor recreation participation growth

What could go wrong

  • Highly cyclical discretionary demand
  • Dealer inventory destocking

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Strong dealer network and long-standing off-road/snowmobile brand leadership.

Headquarters: Medina, Minnesota, US · Founded: 1954 · Employees: 14,500

Named competitors

Polaris at a glance

Size Polaris (PII) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $3.59B, the 1416th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $63.07 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.6%, against +4.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is 2.2% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 22.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.9× (7th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is 0%, so the hurdle is +18 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (9.6% WACC).

Credit Polaris has 2 bonds outstanding ($1.00B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 128 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 9.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 106PII 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Polaris against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Polaris financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$7.65B$7.15B$7.18B$8.93B$8.59B
Revenue growth—0%-20%+4%—
Gross profit$1.46B$1.30B$1.40B$1.91B$1.91B
EBITDA$434M$265M$507M$888M$987M
Net income-$206M-$466M$111M$503M$590M
Free cash flow$327M$620M$74.7M$550M$233M
Capital expenditure$205M$183M$324M$413M$307M
Total debt$1.76B$1.66B$2.20B$2.05B$2.17B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Polaris competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%7951HAYWTGYMASMDEE-BFDRTHOCALYMAT7867GOLF002292TNIEGAW03030325TOYSL08057906MIPSPII6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Polaris is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×7951HAYWTGYMASMDEE-BFDRTHOCALY002292TNIE03030325TOY7906MIPSPIIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Polaris is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%7951HAYWASMDEE-BFDRTHO00229203030325TOYMIPSPIIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Polaris is the large dot.

Polaris competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PII vs TXT vs DOO.TO vs HOG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Polaris PII$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%
Textron TXT$14.2B-8%+9%7%11.9×8.3%
BRP DOO.TO$4.65B+20%+20%7%19.6×-0.1%
Harley-Davidson HOG$3.40B+28%-15%-4%18.6×0.4%
Yamaha Motor 7272.T$10.1B+54%+10%6%9.3×4.2%

How Polaris compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Polaris against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePIIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+19.4%+3.7%4th highest of 21
6-month return-7.6%+4.5%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-19.1%-19.3%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.5%+6.8%8th highest of 21
Operating margin2.2%9.8%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E22.2×17.9×7th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.1%2.5%3rd most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.4%+7.9%3rd lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+17.8 pp-5.2 pp4th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp+3.6 pp2nd lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.6×10.7×8th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA3.4×-0.0×2nd most indebted of 20
Bond spread128 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Polaris PIIUnited States$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%+0.4%
Yamaha 7951.TJapan$3.39B+7%+5%8%15.8×-1.7%+4.5%
Hayward HAYWUnited States$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%+5.1%
Technogym S.p.A TGYM.MIItaly$3.34B-32%+10%16%23.8×9.7%+14.9%
Asmodee ASMDEE-B.STSweden$3.97B+39%+17%16%17.1×-1.8%+11.9%
Fluidra FDR.MCSpain$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%+8.0%
Thor Industries THOUnited States$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%-4.8%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Mattel MATUnited States$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%+3.1%
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Acushnet GOLFUnited States$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%+9.7%
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
Games Workshop GAW.LUnited Kingdom$7.15B-17%+7%42%25.2×11.7%+12.3%
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%47.3×32.9%+7.9%

Polaris bonds and credit

Polaris has 2 bonds outstanding with $1.00B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 5.82%, a spread of 128 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Polaris's main competitors?
Named competitors: Textron Off Road (TXT), BRP Inc. (DOO.TO), Harley-Davidson (HOG), Yamaha Motor (7272.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yamaha (7951.T), Hayward (HAYW), Technogym S.p.A (TGYM.MI), Asmodee (ASMDEE-B.ST), Fluidra (FDR.MC), Thor Industries (THO).
Is Polaris expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 22.2× against a peer median of 17.9×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is 0%, so the hurdle is +18 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Polaris stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.6% against +4.5% for the median peer; over one year -3.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.