Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › HAYW Hayward Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Hayward Holdings, Inc.HAYWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

Makes pumps, filters, heaters, lighting and automation equipment for residential and commercial swimming pools.

Momentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$3.38B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$64.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.2 pp
WACC 9.4%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · USD$16.24
1D-0.8%
1W+0.7%
1M+42.0%
3M+5.2%
6M+11.4%
YTD+5.1%
1Y+0.7%
ATR %3.5%
Beta0.91
52w lowhigh6.8% off high

What Hayward does

Makes pumps, filters, heaters, lighting and automation equipment for residential and commercial swimming pools.

Sells mostly through pool-equipment distributors, with the largest one, Pool Corporation, accounting for a large share of sales, so one distributor channel stands between it and installers. Worn pumps, heaters and filters on the installed base of existing pools give repeat sales beyond the new-build cycle.

Products and services

  • Pool pumps/filters
  • Pool heaters
  • Automation/controls
  • Commercial pool/flow control

Customers

  • Pool builders
  • Pool service/repair professionals
  • Distributors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Pool equipment
  • Pool pumps, filtration and automation

What could go right

  • New pool construction and aftermarket replacement demand

What could go wrong

  • Housing market/discretionary spending sensitivity
  • New-pool construction cyclicality

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, installed base). Large installed base of pools needing branded replacement parts drives recurring aftermarket sales.

Headquarters: Charlotte, North Carolina, US · Founded: 1925 · Employees: 1,980

Named competitors

  • Pentair PNR
  • Fluidra FDR.MC
  • Zodiac (Fluidra) private or unlisted
  • Waterco private or unlisted
  • Maytronics private or unlisted

Hayward at a glance

Size Hayward (HAYW) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $3.38B, the 1461st largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $16.24 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 11.4%, against +2.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is 21.8% (peer median 9.3%).

Valuation It trades at 17.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.6× (10th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.2 points above its cost of capital (9.4% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026HAYW 113Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: Hayward against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hayward financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.18B$1.12B$1.05B$992M$1.31B
Revenue growth—+7%+6%-24%—
Gross profit$515M$511M$458M$447M$565M
EBITDA$314M$294M$271M$241M$351M
Net income$170M$152M$119M$80.7M$179M
Free cash flow$154M$226M$190M$154M$77.8M
Capital expenditure$38.5M$30.7M$24.3M$31.0M$29.6M
Total debt$1.01B$1.02B$1.03B$1.16B$1.18B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hayward competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%+40%7951TGYMPIICALYASMDEE-BFDR7867THOMATGOLF002292TNIE0303GAW0325TOYSL0805MIPSHAYW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hayward is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×7951TGYMCALYASMDEE-BFDR7867MAT002292TNIE03030325TOY7906MIPSHAYWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hayward is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%7951TGYMPIICALYTHOGOLF00229203030325TOYMIPSHAYWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hayward is the large dot.

Hayward competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (HAYW vs PNR vs FDR.MC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hayward HAYW$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%
Pentair PNR$10.9B-11%-4%22%13.2×7.1%
Fluidra FDR.MC$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%

How Hayward compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hayward against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureHAYWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+42.0%+3.7%highest of 21
6-month return+11.4%+2.1%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-6.8%-20.4%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.6%+6.8%9th highest of 21
Operating margin21.8%9.3%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E17.9×18.6×10th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.9%2.5%6th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.1%+7.9%7th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.8 pp-5.2 pp5th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.2 pp+3.6 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA12.5×10.7×7th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×-0.0×5th most indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hayward HAYWUnited States$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%+5.1%
Yamaha 7951.TJapan$3.39B+7%+5%8%15.8×-1.7%+4.5%
Technogym S.p.A TGYM.MIItaly$3.34B-32%+10%16%23.8×9.7%+14.9%
Polaris PIIUnited States$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%+0.4%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Asmodee ASMDEE-B.STSweden$3.97B+39%+17%16%17.1×-1.8%+11.9%
Fluidra FDR.MCSpain$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%+8.0%
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Thor Industries THOUnited States$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%-4.8%
Mattel MATUnited States$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%+3.1%
Acushnet GOLFUnited States$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%+9.7%
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Games Workshop GAW.LUnited Kingdom$7.15B-17%+7%42%25.2×11.7%+12.3%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%47.3×32.9%+7.9%

Questions

Who are Hayward's main competitors?
Named competitors: Pentair (PNR), Fluidra (FDR.MC), Zodiac (Fluidra) (private or unlisted), Waterco (private or unlisted), Maytronics (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yamaha (7951.T), Technogym S.p.A (TGYM.MI), Polaris (PII), Callaway Golf (CALY), Asmodee (ASMDEE-B.ST), Fluidra (FDR.MC).
Is Hayward expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.9× against a peer median of 18.6×, 10th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Hayward stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +11.4% against +2.1% for the median peer; over one year +0.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.