Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7867.T Tomy Company, Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Tomy Company, Ltd.7867.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

Japan's largest toy maker, known for Transformers, Tomica die-cast cars, Plarail trains and Beyblade.

≈ Japan's Hasbro/MattelMomentum leader 98
Mkt cap
$2.74B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
80%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$25.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+16.8 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
-11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥4,819
1D-7.4%
1W+9.3%
1M+14.4%
3M+31.8%
6M+89.3%
YTD+74.8%
1Y+48.5%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh7.9% off high

What Tomy does

Japan's largest toy maker, known for Transformers, Tomica die-cast cars, Plarail trains and Beyblade.

Formed in 2006 when Tomy merged with Takara, it sells toys to retailers and wholesalers worldwide, with Japan the main base. Franchises it owns, such as Tomica and Plarail, carry higher margins since it keeps the rights, while licensed characters such as Pokémon require paying royalties to the owner.

In one line: Japan's Hasbro/Mattel.

Products and services

  • Transformers toys
  • Tomica die-cast vehicles
  • Plarail toy trains
  • Beyblade
  • Licensed character toys

Customers

  • Children/families
  • Retailers worldwide

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Toys & games
  • Manufacturing & licensing

What could go right

  • Global demand for licensed character toys
  • Overseas expansion

What could go wrong

  • Toy fads are short-lived
  • Input cost and tariff exposure

Moat: narrow (brand, IP / patents). Long-running owned franchises (Tomica, Plarail) and a global Transformers license with Hasbro.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1924 · Employees: 2,574

Named competitors

Tomy at a glance

Size Tomy (7867.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $2.74B, the 388th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,819 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 89.3%, against +2.1% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.1%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 20.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.1× (7th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 16.8 points above its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267867.T 190Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: Tomy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tomy financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥275B¥270B¥250B¥208B¥187B
Revenue growth—+8%+20%+11%—
Gross profit¥113B¥109B¥101B¥85.0B¥72.3B
EBITDA¥34.7B¥33.6B¥33.2B¥26.8B¥21.0B
Net income¥12.3B¥11.7B¥16.4B¥9.81B¥8.31B
Free cash flown/a¥14.5B¥11.2B¥27.6B¥14.7B
Capital expendituren/a¥7.64B¥7.93B¥4.66B¥2.61B
Total debt¥5.80B¥7.51B¥10.8B¥16.9B¥36.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tomy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%CALYTGYMHAYW7951PII002292ASMDEE-BTNIEFDRTHO0303MATGOLF0325TOYSL08057906MIPS66707867.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tomy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×CALYTGYMHAYW7951002292ASMDEE-BTNIEFDRTHO0303MAT0325TOY7906MIPS7867.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tomy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%CALYTGYM7951PII002292FDR03030325MIPS66707867.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tomy is the large dot.

Tomy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (7867.T vs 7832.T vs HAS vs MAT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Tomy 7867.T$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%
Bandai Namco 7832.T$26.1B+76%+9%15%25.5×-0.4%
Hasbro HAS$16.6B+22%+19%31%17.3×-9.8%
Mattel MAT$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%
Sanrio 8136.T$9.78B+33%+28%39%22.4×1.9%

How Tomy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tomy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7867.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+14.4%+3.7%7th highest of 21
6-month return+89.3%+2.1%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.9%-18.1%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.4%+6.1%10th highest of 21
Operating margin9.2%9.8%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E20.2×17.1×7th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.5%2.4%9th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.9%+7.0%4th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.4 pp-5.2 pp6th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+16.8 pp+2.0 pp4th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.5×10.0×8th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×0.2×5th least indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Technogym S.p.A TGYM.MIItaly$3.34B-32%+10%16%23.8×9.7%+14.9%
Hayward HAYWUnited States$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%+5.1%
Yamaha 7951.TJapan$3.39B+7%+5%8%15.8×-1.7%+4.5%
Polaris PIIUnited States$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%+0.4%
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
Asmodee ASMDEE-B.STSweden$3.97B+39%+17%16%17.1×-1.8%+11.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
Fluidra FDR.MCSpain$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%+8.0%
Thor Industries THOUnited States$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%-4.8%
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Mattel MATUnited States$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%+3.1%
Acushnet GOLFUnited States$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%+9.7%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%47.3×32.9%+7.9%
Fusheng Precision 6670.TWTaiwan$1.07B-1%+1%15%9.3×-14.6%+15.9%

Questions

Who are Tomy's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bandai Namco Holdings (7832.T), Hasbro (HAS), Mattel (MAT), Sanrio (8136.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Callaway Golf (CALY), Technogym S.p.A (TGYM.MI), Hayward (HAYW), Yamaha (7951.T), Polaris (PII), Alpha (002292.SZ).
Is Tomy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.2× against a peer median of 17.1×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tomy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +89.3% against +2.1% for the median peer; over one year +48.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.