Loading…

Mattel, Inc.MATCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

Designs and markets toys including Barbie, Hot Wheels and Fisher-Price, plus film and TV licensing.

Momentum neutral 53
Mkt cap
$4.39B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$96.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.0 pp
WACC 6.9%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · USD$15.35
1D+2.5%
1W-0.5%
1M-7.4%
3M+4.1%
6M-0.3%
YTD-22.6%
1Y-19.5%
ATR %4.2%
Beta0.60
52w lowhigh31.7% off high

What Mattel does

Designs and markets toys including Barbie, Hot Wheels and Fisher-Price, plus film and TV licensing.

Sells to a few big retailers such as Walmart, Target and Amazon, which take a large share of output, and most orders land in the second half of the year for the holiday season. Toys are made in its own plants and by contract makers. Since the 2023 Barbie film it has made content and licensing a larger part of its strategy.

Products and services

  • Barbie dolls
  • Hot Wheels vehicles
  • Fisher-Price infant/toddler
  • American Girl
  • Movie/content licensing

Customers

  • Mass retailers (Walmart, Target)
  • Amazon
  • Toy specialty stores

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Toys and games
  • Branded toy design and licensing

What could go right

  • Toy-to-film/streaming content monetization

What could go wrong

  • Retailer inventory cycles
  • Input cost/tariff exposure

Moat: narrow (brand, IP / patents). Decades-old brands like Barbie and Hot Wheels have durable consumer recognition.

Headquarters: El Segundo, California, US · Founded: 1945 · Employees: 31,000

Named competitors

Mattel at a glance

Size Mattel (MAT) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $4.39B, the 1285th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $15.35 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.3%, against +4.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 8.7% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 12.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.6× (5th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.0 points above its cost of capital (6.9% WACC).

Credit Mattel has 5 bonds outstanding ($2.35B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BB+ at a weighted spread of 158 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 9.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 106MAT 102
Six months, rebased to 100: Mattel against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mattel financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$5.49B$5.35B$5.38B$5.44B$5.43B
Revenue growth—-1%-1%0%—
Gross profit$2.59B$2.60B$2.69B$2.53B$2.43B
EBITDA$653M$774M$890M$760M$865M
Net income$427M$398M$542M$214M$394M
Free cash flow$435M$411M$598M$709M$256M
Capital expenditure$232M$182M$203M$160M$187M
Total debt$2.75B$2.68B$2.69B$2.67B$2.67B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mattel competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%THOFDRGOLFASMDEE-BPII7951HAYWTGYM7867GAW002292TNIE03030325TOYSL08057906MIPSMAT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mattel is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×THOFDRASMDEE-BPII7951HAYWCALYGAW002292TNIE03030325TOY7906MIPSMATRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mattel is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%THOFDRGOLFASMDEE-BHAYWTGYM00229203030325TOYMIPSMATGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Mattel is the large dot.

Mattel competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MAT vs HAS vs TOY.TO vs JAKK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mattel MAT$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%
Hasbro HAS$16.6B+22%+19%31%17.3×-9.8%
Spin Master TOY.TO$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%
JAKKS Pacific JAKK$388M+45%+9%4%14.2×10.8%
Bandai Namco 7832.T$26.1B+76%+9%15%25.5×-0.4%
Funko FNKO$377M+28%-4%3%25.7×13.0%
Tomy 7867.T$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%

How Mattel compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mattel against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMATPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.4%+8.1%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-0.3%+4.5%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-31.7%-18.1%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.9%+7.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin8.7%9.8%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E12.8×18.6×5th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.2%3.8%7th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.1%+7.9%5th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.9 pp-5.2 pp8th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.0 pp+3.6 pp10th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA10.1×11.4×9th cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA3.4×-0.0×most indebted of 20
Bond spread158 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mattel MATUnited States$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%+3.1%
Thor Industries THOUnited States$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%-4.8%
Fluidra FDR.MCSpain$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%+8.0%
Acushnet GOLFUnited States$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%+9.7%
Asmodee ASMDEE-B.STSweden$3.97B+39%+17%16%17.1×-1.8%+11.9%
Polaris PIIUnited States$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%+0.4%
Yamaha 7951.TJapan$3.39B+7%+5%8%15.8×-1.7%+4.5%
Hayward HAYWUnited States$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%+5.1%
Technogym S.p.A TGYM.MIItaly$3.34B-32%+10%16%23.8×9.7%+14.9%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Games Workshop GAW.LUnited Kingdom$7.15B-17%+7%42%25.2×11.7%+12.3%
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%47.3×32.9%+7.9%

Mattel bonds and credit

Mattel has 5 bonds outstanding with $2.35B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BB+. Weighted yield 6.21%, a spread of 158 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Mattel's main competitors?
Named competitors: Hasbro (HAS), LEGO (private or unlisted), Spin Master (TOY.TO), Jazwares (private or unlisted), JAKKS Pacific (JAKK), Bandai Namco (7832.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Thor Industries (THO), Fluidra (FDR.MC), Acushnet (GOLF), Asmodee (ASMDEE-B.ST), Polaris (PII), Yamaha (7951.T).
Is Mattel expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.8× against a peer median of 18.6×, 5th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Mattel stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.3% against +4.5% for the median peer; over one year -19.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.