Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Acushnet Holdings Corp.GOLFCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

Makes golf balls, clubs, shoes and gloves under the Titleist and FootJoy brands sold worldwide.

Momentum weak 38
Mkt cap
$4.72B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
47%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.2 pp
WACC 8.2%
Hurdle
-6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · USD$80.74
1D-3.4%
1W-5.3%
1M+2.0%
3M-11.7%
6M-11.8%
YTD+1.1%
1Y+3.1%
ATR %4.0%
Beta0.53
52w lowhigh32.5% off high

What Acushnet does

Makes golf balls, clubs, shoes and gloves under the Titleist and FootJoy brands sold worldwide.

Sells most of its products through golf pro shops and specialty stores, which recommend the brand to serious players, so a loyal base of dedicated golfers matters more than casual buyers. Golf balls are its largest product, made in its own plants in Massachusetts and Thailand; they are replaced often, giving repeat sales, while clubs follow launch cycles.

Products and services

  • Titleist golf balls
  • Titleist golf clubs
  • FootJoy shoes/apparel
  • Golf accessories

Customers

  • Golf retailers
  • Pro shops
  • Golfers worldwide

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Sporting goods
  • Golf equipment and apparel

What could go right

  • Growing golf participation post-pandemic

What could go wrong

  • Discretionary consumer spending sensitivity
  • FX exposure from global sales

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Titleist's tour-validated brand and pro-shop distribution are hard for challengers to match.

Headquarters: Fairhaven, Massachusetts, US · Founded: 1910 · Employees: 7,300

Named competitors

Acushnet at a glance

Size Acushnet (GOLF) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $4.72B, the 1223rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $80.74 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.8%, against +4.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 13.4% (peer median 9.3%).

Valuation It trades at 20.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.3× (8th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.2 points above its cost of capital (8.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 106GOLF 92
Six months, rebased to 100: Acushnet against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Acushnet financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.70B$2.56B$2.46B$2.38B$2.27B
Revenue growth—+4%+3%+5%—
Gross profit$1.32B$1.21B$1.16B$1.23B$1.16B
EBITDA$416M$350M$348M$333M$322M
Net income$221M$189M$214M$198M$199M
Free cash flow$238M$120M$170M$296M-$129M
Capital expenditure$80.4M$74.3M$74.6M$101M$126M
Total debt$877M$1.07B$844M$794M$628M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Acushnet competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%MATTHOFDRASMDEE-BPII7951HAYWTGYMGAW7867002292TNIE03030325TOYSL0805HAS7906GOLF6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Acushnet is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×MATTHOFDRASMDEE-BPII7951GAWCALY002292TNIE03030325TOYHAS7906GOLFRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Acushnet is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%MATTHOFDRASMDEE-BHAYWTGYM00229203030325TOYGOLFGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Acushnet is the large dot.

Acushnet competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GOLF vs CALY vs 5110.T vs ADS.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Acushnet GOLF$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%
Callaway Golf CALY$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%
Sumitomo Rubber Industries 5110.T$3.40B+1%+5%8%9.8×-3.3%
adidas ADS.DE$33.2B+19%+8%9%18.3×3.5%
Nike NKE$57.3B-13%-1%9%30.4×7.0%

How Acushnet compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Acushnet against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGOLFPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.0%+8.1%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-11.8%+4.5%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-32.5%-18.1%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.8%+7.1%11th highest of 21
Operating margin13.4%9.3%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E20.0×17.3×8th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)3.8%2.4%8th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.7%+5.3%7th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.9 pp-5.2 pp9th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.2 pp+2.0 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA13.2×10.5×5th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA1.9×-0.0×4th most indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Acushnet GOLFUnited States$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%+9.7%
Mattel MATUnited States$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%+3.1%
Thor Industries THOUnited States$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%-4.8%
Fluidra FDR.MCSpain$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%+8.0%
Asmodee ASMDEE-B.STSweden$3.97B+39%+17%16%17.1×-1.8%+11.9%
Polaris PIIUnited States$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%+0.4%
Yamaha 7951.TJapan$3.39B+7%+5%8%15.8×-1.7%+4.5%
Hayward HAYWUnited States$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%+5.1%
Technogym S.p.A TGYM.MIItaly$3.34B-32%+10%16%23.8×9.7%+14.9%
Games Workshop GAW.LUnited Kingdom$7.15B-17%+7%42%25.2×11.7%+12.3%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Hasbro HASUnited States$16.6B+22%+19%31%17.3×-9.8%-3.0%
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Acushnet's main competitors?
Named competitors: Callaway Golf Company (CALY), Topgolf Callaway Brands (private or unlisted), PXG (private or unlisted), Bridgestone Golf (private or unlisted), Sumitomo Rubber Industries (5110.T), adidas (ADS.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Mattel (MAT), Thor Industries (THO), Fluidra (FDR.MC), Asmodee (ASMDEE-B.ST), Polaris (PII), Yamaha (7951.T).
Is Acushnet expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.0× against a peer median of 17.3×, 8th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Acushnet stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.8% against +4.5% for the median peer; over one year +3.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.