Loading…

Nike, Inc.NKECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear

World's largest athletic footwear and apparel brand, selling globally through wholesale retailers and its own direct-to-consumer channels.

Momentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$57.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$933M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.6 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
+6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
41 days
17 Dec 2026
Close · USD$38.59
1D-2.5%
1W-0.2%
1M+11.1%
3M-8.4%
6M-12.6%
YTD-39.0%
1Y-37.1%
ATR %3.2%
Beta0.62
52w lowhigh43.8% off high

What Nike does

World's largest athletic footwear and apparel brand, selling globally through wholesale retailers and its own direct-to-consumer channels.

Designs and markets but outsources nearly all manufacturing to contract factories, mainly in Vietnam, Indonesia and China. It sells through wholesale partners and its own stores and apps; the mix shifted toward direct sales, then back toward wholesale from 2024. Co-founder Phil Knight's family holds the voting Class A shares. Jordan and Converse are subsidiaries.

Products and services

  • Footwear
  • Apparel
  • Nike Direct (retail/digital)
  • Equipment/accessories

Customers

  • Athletes and consumers globally
  • Wholesale retailers (Foot Locker, Dick's)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Athletic footwear and apparel
  • Brand design, marketing and global…

What could go right

  • Direct-to-consumer/digital mix shift
  • Innovation-driven product cycles

What could go wrong

  • Wholesale channel disruption/inventory gluts
  • Rising competition from newer brands

Moat: wide (brand, scale, distribution). Globally dominant brand built on athlete endorsements and marketing scale sustains premium pricing.

Headquarters: Beaverton, Oregon, US · Founded: 1964 · Employees: 73,000

Named competitors

Nike at a glance

Size Nike (NKE) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear) with a market value of $57.3B, the 227th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $38.59 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 12.6%, against +7.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.6%); the operating margin is 8.8% (peer median 19.0%).

Valuation It trades at 30.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.7× (3rd most expensive of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.6 points above its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Credit Nike has 7 bonds outstanding ($7.00B), rated A by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 77 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 8.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 111NKE 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Nike against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Nike financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-05-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$45.9B$46.4B$46.4B$51.4B$51.2B
Revenue growth—0%-10%0%—
Gross profit$19.9B$20.0B$19.6B$22.6B$21.7B
EBITDA$4.80B$4.91B$4.27B$6.84B$6.02B
Net income$3.09B$3.11B$3.22B$5.70B$5.07B
Free cash flow$2.10B$2.18B$3.27B$6.62B$4.87B
Capital expenditure$676M$684M$430M$812M$969M
Total debt$11.1B$11.0B$11.0B$12.0B$12.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Nike competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+5%+10%+15%+20%ADS2020NXTRL7936RMS7453MCNKE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Nike is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%20×30×ADS2020NXTRL7936RMS7453MCNKERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Nike is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+5%+10%+15%+20%0%10%20%ADS2020NXTRL7936RMS7453MCNKEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Nike is the large dot.

Nike competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (NKE vs ADS.DE vs LULU vs PUM.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Nike NKE$57.3B-13%-1%9%30.4×7.0%
adidas ADS.DE$33.2B+19%+8%9%18.3×3.5%
Lululemon Athletica LULU$12.8B-16%+2%18%13.4×-8.9%
Puma PUM.DE$4.42B+4%-19%-6%n/an/a
On Holding AG Class A ONON$12.3B+6%+29%14%20.0×22.0%
Deckers Brands DECK$11.6B-14%+6%23%11.0×-3.3%

How Nike compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Nike against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNKEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.1%+8.2%3rd highest of 9
6-month return-12.6%+7.5%2nd lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-43.8%-9.7%lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.4%+13.6%2nd lowest of 9
Operating margin8.8%19.0%lowest of 9
Forward P/E30.4×18.7×3rd most expensive of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.0%10.6%3rd least demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.8%+14.8%lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.2 pp-2.5 ppmost demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.6 pp+14.9 pp2nd lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA12.5×14.4×4th cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA0.6×-0.2×4th most indebted of 8
Bond spread77 bp61 bp2nd widest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Nike NKEUnited States$57.3B-13%-1%9%30.4×7.0%+0.8%
adidas ADS.DEGermany$33.2B+19%+8%9%18.3×3.5%+6.1%
Anta Sports 2020.HKHong Kong$28.2B+2%+17%21%12.5×-0.7%+16.9%
Next NXT.LUnited Kingdom$23.8B+24%+13%19%18.8×12.5%+14.3%
Ralph Lauren RLUnited States$22.4B+5%+15%17%18.6×11.0%+13.0%
Asics 7936.TJapan$20.7B+10%+28%19%27.1×14.1%+19.8%
Hermes International SCA RMS.PAFrance$160B-14%+3%42%30.9×17.9%+20.2%
Ryohin Keikaku 7453.TJapan$16.4B+31%+18%11%32.4×9.5%+15.3%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton MC.PAFrance$226B-11%-4%22%18.6×10.2%+12.6%

Nike bonds and credit

Nike has 7 bonds outstanding with $7.00B face value. The agencies rate it A; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 5.82%, a spread of 77 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Nike's main competitors?
Named competitors: Adidas (ADS.DE), Lululemon Athletica (LULU), Puma (PUM.DE), On Holding (ONON), Deckers Brands (Hoka) (DECK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes adidas (ADS.DE), Anta Sports (2020.HK), Next (NXT.L), Ralph Lauren (RL), Asics (7936.T), Hermes International SCA (RMS.PA).
Is Nike expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.4× against a peer median of 18.7×, 3rd most expensive of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Nike stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -12.6% against +7.5% for the median peer; over one year -37.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.