Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LULU Lululemon AthleticaOpen in the cockpit ↗

Lululemon AthleticaLULUCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear

Premium athletic apparel ('athleisure') brand known for yoga and performance wear, sold via its own stores and digital channels.

Momentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$12.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$352M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+20.0 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
-29 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
27 days
3 Dec 2026
Close · USD$110.79
1D-0.9%
1W+3.3%
1M+19.5%
3M-13.3%
6M-15.5%
YTD-46.7%
1Y-33.9%
ATR %3.9%
Beta1.14
52w lowhigh51.0% off high

What Lululemon Athletica does

Premium athletic apparel ('athleisure') brand known for yoga and performance wear, sold via its own stores and digital channels.

Sells nearly all its products through its own stores and websites, which keeps pricing control, and relies on contract factories in Asia to make them. North America provides most of its sales, with China and Europe the expansion areas. Founder Chip Wilson remains a large shareholder.

Products and services

  • Women's apparel
  • Men's apparel
  • Accessories and footwear

Customers

  • Fitness-focused consumers, primarily North America

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Athletic/athleisure apparel
  • Brand design and direct-to-consumer…

What could go right

  • International growth (China, Europe)
  • New category expansion

What could go wrong

  • North America same-store sales deceleration
  • Rising athleisure competition

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Strong brand loyalty in premium athleisure, though growth has slowed amid rising competition.

Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 39,000

Named competitors

Lululemon Athletica at a glance

Size Lululemon Athletica (LULU) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear) with a market value of $12.8B, the 666th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $110.79 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.5%, against +4.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.9%); the operating margin is 18.0% (peer median 16.5%).

Valuation It trades at 13.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.6× (8th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +20%, so the hurdle is -29 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 20.0 points above its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 15.4% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 106LULU 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Lululemon Athletica against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lululemon Athletica financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-01-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$11.1B$11.1B$10.6B$9.62B$8.11B
Revenue growth—+5%+10%+19%—
Gross profit$6.22B$6.28B$6.27B$5.60B$4.48B
EBITDA$2.54B$2.73B$2.95B$2.59B$2.03B
Net income$1.42B$1.58B$1.81B$1.55B$855M
Free cash flow$1.35B$922M$1.58B$1.64B$328M
Capital expenditure$628M$681M$689M$652M$639M
Total debt$2.14B$1.80B$1.58B$1.40B$1.07B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lululemon Athletica competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%0%+10%+20%+30%ONONMONCDECK7453LEVI2313VFC7936RL300979CROXNXT3998BIRKBCGILZGN600177BRBYLULU6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lululemon Athletica is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×30×ONONMONCDECK7453LEVI2313VFC7936RL300979CROXNXT3998BIRKBCGILZGN2020600177BRBYLULURevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lululemon Athletica is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%ONONMONCDECK7453LEVI2313VFC7936RL300979CROXNXT3998BIRKBCGILZGN2020600177BRBYLULUGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lululemon Athletica is the large dot.

Lululemon Athletica competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LULU vs NKE vs ONON vs GAP)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lululemon Athletica LULU$12.8B-16%+2%18%13.4×-8.9%
Nike NKE$57.3B-13%-1%9%30.4×7.0%
On Holding AG Class A ONON$12.3B+6%+29%14%20.0×22.0%
Gap GAP$7.55B-8%+1%11%8.4×-2.3%
Deckers Brands DECK$11.6B-14%+6%23%11.0×-3.3%

How Lululemon Athletica compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lululemon Athletica against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLULUPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+19.5%+9.8%6th highest of 21
6-month return-15.5%+4.8%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-51.0%-13.6%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.7%+8.9%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin18.0%16.5%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E13.4×17.6×8th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-8.9%10.1%2nd least demanding of 21
Growth delivered (Del g)+20.3%+14.3%4th highest of 21
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-29.2 pp-5.9 pp2nd least demanding of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+20.0 pp+9.1 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.3×10.1×cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×0.9×8th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lululemon Athletica LULUUnited States$12.8B-16%+2%18%13.4×-8.9%+20.3%
On Holding AG Class A ONONUnited States$12.3B+6%+29%14%20.0×22.0%+51.6%
Moncler MONC.MIItaly$13.8B-11%+3%29%19.5×10.8%+16.8%
Deckers Brands DECKUnited States$11.6B-14%+6%23%11.0×-3.3%+16.5%
Ryohin Keikaku 7453.TJapan$16.4B+31%+18%11%32.4×9.5%+15.3%
Levi Strauss & LEVIUnited States$8.77B+1%+5%13%14.6×5.2%+7.1%
Shenzhou Intl 2313.HKHong Kong$8.08B-7%+2%16%11.8×-4.5%+5.4%
V.F VFCUnited States$8.01B+7%-2%8%16.6×11.1%+0.8%
Asics 7936.TJapan$20.7B+10%+28%19%27.1×14.1%+19.8%
Ralph Lauren RLUnited States$22.4B+5%+15%17%18.6×11.0%+13.0%
Huali Industrial 300979.SZChina$7.09B+6%-10%14%19.7×-4.4%+12.4%
Crocs CROXUnited States$6.94B+47%+1%23%9.6×1.1%+23.9%
Next NXT.LUnited Kingdom$23.8B+24%+13%19%18.8×12.5%+14.3%
Bosideng International 3998.HKHong Kong$6.64B+3%+8%18%10.3×-10.8%+14.2%
Birkenstock BIRKUnited States$6.64B-5%+20%24%13.9×7.4%+19.9%
Brunello Cucinelli BC.MIItaly$6.61B+4%+10%18%37.8×20.6%+20.9%
Gildan Activewear GIL.TOCanada$6.48B-40%+40%15%6.8×6.5%+13.7%
Ermenegildo Zegna ZGNUnited States$5.96B+7%+11%9%31.1×20.3%+11.3%
Anta Sports 2020.HKHong Kong$28.2B+2%+17%21%12.5×-0.7%+16.9%
Youngor Fashion 600177.SSChina$5.69B+10%-5%-3%12.8×23.3%+0.1%
Burberry BRBY.LUnited Kingdom$5.38B-4%-2%7%28.8×19.1%+0.6%

Questions

Who are Lululemon Athletica's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nike (NKE), On Holding (ONON), Gap (Athleta) (GAP), Deckers Brands (DECK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes On Holding AG Class A (ONON), Moncler (MONC.MI), Deckers Brands (DECK), Ryohin Keikaku (7453.T), Levi Strauss & (LEVI), Shenzhou Intl (2313.HK).
Is Lululemon Athletica expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.4× against a peer median of 17.6×, 8th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +20%, so the hurdle is -29 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Lululemon Athletica stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.5% against +4.8% for the median peer; over one year -33.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.