Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SL.MI Sanlorenzo S.p.A.Open in the cockpit ↗

Sanlorenzo S.p.A.SL.MICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Italy · EUR·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

Italian luxury yacht builder making custom motor yachts, superyachts and the Bluegame sport-yacht line for ultra-wealthy buyers.

≈ Italy's luxury yacht builderMomentum weak 38
Mkt cap
$1.46B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
37%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.29M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+11.8 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · EUR€36.52
1D+1.1%
1W+3.6%
1M+4.3%
3M-8.2%
6M-6.9%
YTD+20.5%
1Y+11.8%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh8.7% off high

What Sanlorenzo does

Italian luxury yacht builder making custom motor yachts, superyachts and the Bluegame sport-yacht line for ultra-wealthy buyers.

Builds yachts largely to order, taking deposits and staged payments before delivery, so the order backlog gives good visibility and revenue is recognized as each boat is built. It sells through brokers and agents. Chairman and CEO Massimo Perotti is the controlling shareholder.

In one line: Italy's luxury yacht builder.

Products and services

  • Yachts (24-50m range)
  • Superyachts (500+ GT)
  • Bluegame sport yachts

Customers

  • Ultra-high-net-worth individuals globally

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Luxury goods
  • Yacht manufacturing
  • Custom superyacht building

What could go right

  • Strong order backlog / UHNW wealth growth
  • US market expansion

What could go wrong

  • Cyclical luxury demand
  • Interest-rate sensitivity of UHNW buyers

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base). Craftsmanship reputation and custom-build order backlog limit near-term new entrants.

Headquarters: Ameglia, Italy · Founded: 1958 · Employees: 1,655

Named competitors

  • Ferretti S.p.A. YACHT.MI
  • Azimut Benetti private or unlisted
  • Feadship private or unlisted
  • Princess Yachts private or unlisted

Sanlorenzo at a glance

Size Sanlorenzo (SL.MI) is an Italy Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $1.46B, the 69th largest of 123 Italy companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €36.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 6.9%, against -7.0% for the median peer and +3.1% for the Italy market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.3%); the operating margin is 13.8% (peer median 8.3%).

Valuation It trades at 11.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (5th cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.8 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

909510010511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95SL.MI 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Sanlorenzo against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sanlorenzo financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€1.03B€1.00B€963M€854M€751M
Revenue growth—+4%+13%+14%—
Gross profit€141M€132M€138M€139M€112M
EBITDA€184M€156M€157M€146M€122M
Net income€110M€107M€103M€92.8M€74.2M
Free cash flow€101M€35.8M-€2.45M€88.8M€108M
Capital expenditure€50.0M€48.2M€49.3M€44.5M€50.0M
Total debt€154M€168M€145M€76.1M€101M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sanlorenzo competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%-20%0%+20%TOY0325080579060303MIPSTNIE66700023480022921736YACHTWGO002678RGR7867CALYTRON8033605299SL.MI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sanlorenzo is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×TOY032579060303MIPSTNIE66700022921736WGORGR7867CALY605299SL.MIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sanlorenzo is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%TOY03250303MIPS66700022921736YACHTWGORGR7867SL.MIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sanlorenzo is the large dot.

Sanlorenzo competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SL.MI vs YACHT.MI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sanlorenzo SL.MI$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%
Ferretti YACHT.MI$967M-27%+1%7%11.6×3.2%

How Sanlorenzo compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sanlorenzo against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSL.MIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.3%+1.1%9th highest of 21
6-month return-6.9%-7.0%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-8.7%-30.4%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.9%+9.3%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin13.8%8.3%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.8×15.8×5th cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.0%2.4%5th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.7%+7.4%6th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.7 pp-9.0 pp5th least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+11.8 pp-1.0 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA6.9×8.5×4th cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×-0.6×7th most indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%47.3×32.9%+7.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
Fusheng Precision 6670.TWTaiwan$1.07B-1%+1%15%9.3×-14.6%+15.9%
GoldLok Holdings (Guangdong) 002348.SZChina$1.03B-38%+77%-14%n/an/an/a
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
Johnson Health Tech 1736.TWTaiwan$1.01B-12%+8%8%8.5×-8.0%+13.9%
Ferretti YACHT.MIItaly$967M-27%+1%7%11.6×3.2%+15.9%
Winnebago Industries WGOUnited States$892M-1%-3%2%15.8×6.9%-5.7%
Guangzhou Pearl River Piano 002678.SZChina$852M-30%+14%-54%n/an/an/a
Sturm, Ruger & RGRUnited States$798M+28%+8%2%26.8×21.9%-0.8%
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Tron TRONUnited States$669M-37%+20%-45%n/an/an/a
Thunder Tiger 8033.TWTaiwan$647M-14%+11%-5%n/an/an/a
Shuhua Sports 605299.SSChina$642M-60%+20%9%32.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Sanlorenzo's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ferretti S.p.A. (YACHT.MI), Azimut Benetti (private or unlisted), Feadship (private or unlisted), Princess Yachts (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Spin Master (TOY.TO), Bloks (0325.HK), New Gonow Recreational Vehicles (0805.HK), Yonex (7906.T), VTech (0303.HK), Mips (MIPS.ST).
Is Sanlorenzo expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.8× against a peer median of 15.8×, 5th cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Sanlorenzo stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -6.9% against -7.0% for the median peer; over one year +11.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.