Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002678.SZ Guangzhou Pearl River Piano Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guangzhou Pearl River Piano Group Co., Ltd. Class A002678.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products
Momentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$852M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
15%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.63M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-14.8 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥4.18
1D-0.9%
1W+6.4%
1M-5.0%
3M-6.1%
6M-30.2%
YTD-21.6%
1Y-32.5%
ATR %3.9%
52w lowhigh40.2% off high

What Guangzhou Pearl River Piano does

Employees: 1,900

Guangzhou Pearl River Piano at a glance

Size Guangzhou Pearl River Piano (002678.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $852M, the 2616th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.18 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 30.2%, against -10.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 13.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.1%); the operating margin is -54.4% (peer median 7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 8.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (6th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.8 points below its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 91002678.SZ 69
Six months, rebased to 100: Guangzhou Pearl River Piano against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guangzhou Pearl River Piano financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥611MCN¥566MCN¥674MCN¥1.12BCN¥1.65B
Revenue growth—-16%-40%-32%—
Gross profitCN¥92.4M-CN¥1.22MCN¥50.7MCN¥201MCN¥368M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥279M-CN¥182MCN¥5.17MCN¥218M
Net income-CN¥347M-CN¥374M-CN¥236MCN¥5.88MCN¥123M
Free cash flow-CN¥157M-CN¥254M-CN¥421M-CN¥361M-CN¥6.81M
Capital expenditureCN¥87.2MCN¥126MCN¥214MCN¥56.5MCN¥123M
Total debtCN¥308MCN¥321MCN¥268MCN¥443MCN¥872M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guangzhou Pearl River Piano competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%-20%0%WGORGRYACHT17360023486670TRON803360529979443028MIPS79060805SLMCFTJOUTTOY1126002678.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guangzhou Pearl River Piano is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0×5×10×15×WGORGRYACHT17360023486670TRON80336052993028MIPS79060805MCFTJOUT605080002678.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guangzhou Pearl River Piano is the large dot.

Guangzhou Pearl River Piano competitors and peer comparison

How Guangzhou Pearl River Piano compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guangzhou Pearl River Piano against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002678.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.0%-1.0%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-30.2%-10.4%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.2%-27.4%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+13.9%+9.1%8th highest of 21
Operating margin-54.4%7.3%lowest of 21
EV / Sales8.9×1.1×6th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-14.8 pp+0.1 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Guangzhou Pearl River Piano 002678.SZChina$852M-30%+14%-54%8.9×n/an/a
Winnebago Industries WGOUnited States$892M-1%-3%2%0.5×6.9%-5.7%
Sturm, Ruger & RGRUnited States$798M+28%+8%2%1.2×21.9%-0.8%
Ferretti YACHT.MIItaly$967M-27%+1%7%0.6×3.2%+15.9%
Johnson Health Tech 1736.TWTaiwan$1.01B-12%+8%8%0.8×-8.0%+13.9%
GoldLok Holdings (Guangdong) 002348.SZChina$1.03B-38%+77%-14%12.6×n/an/a
Fusheng Precision 6670.TWTaiwan$1.07B-1%+1%15%1.0×-14.6%+15.9%
Tron TRONUnited States$669M-37%+20%-45%130.4×n/an/a
Thunder Tiger 8033.TWTaiwan$647M-14%+11%-5%14.2×n/an/a
Shuhua Sports 605299.SSChina$642M-60%+20%9%2.3×n/an/a
Roland 7944.TJapan$605M-11%+8%9%0.9×-8.3%+9.5%
Alpen 3028.TJapan$590M+26%+6%3%0.3×-3.0%+4.2%
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%16.5×32.9%+7.9%
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%1.1×n/an/a
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%10.1×n/an/a
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%1.2×-2.0%+13.7%
Mastercraft Boat MCFTUnited States$493M-26%+23%3%1.3×28.3%-7.9%
Johnson Outdoors JOUTUnited States$490M-8%+17%3%0.6×10.1%-0.1%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%0.9×-11.5%+7.0%
Dream International 1126.HKHong Kong$474M-27%+10%11%0.4×-20.1%+9.6%
Zhejiang Natural Outdoor Goods 605080.SSChina$472M-12%-2%14%2.1×7.6%+11.9%

Questions

Which companies are Guangzhou Pearl River Piano's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Winnebago Industries (WGO), Sturm, Ruger & (RGR), Ferretti (YACHT.MI), Johnson Health Tech (1736.TW), GoldLok Holdings (Guangdong) (002348.SZ), Fusheng Precision (6670.TW), Tron (TRON), Thunder Tiger (8033.TW).
Is Guangzhou Pearl River Piano expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 8.9× against a peer median of 1.1×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Guangzhou Pearl River Piano stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -30.2% against -10.4% for the median peer; over one year -32.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.