Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › THO Thor Industries, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Thor Industries, Inc.THOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Recreational Products

World's largest RV manufacturer, making towable and motorized recreational vehicles under many brand names.

Momentum strong 75
Mkt cap
$4.18B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$67.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
22.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.8 pp
WACC 11.2%
Hurdle
+21 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
33 days
9 Dec 2026
Close · USD$80.77
1D-1.9%
1W+9.3%
1M+22.2%
3M+1.6%
6M+4.6%
YTD-21.3%
1Y-22.5%
ATR %4.0%
Beta0.94
52w lowhigh34.2% off high

What Thor Industries does

World's largest RV manufacturer, making towable and motorized recreational vehicles under many brand names.

Sells wholesale to independent dealers, who stock vehicles with floorplan loans (inventory financing) and sell to consumers, so factory shipments depend on how many dealers will stock and how many buyers can finance a purchase. Interest rates matter twice, on dealer costs and consumer payments. The 2019 Erwin Hymer Group deal added a major European business.

Products and services

  • Towable RVs (Jayco, Keystone)
  • Motorized RVs (Airstream, Thor Motor Coach)
  • European RVs (Erwin Hymer)

Customers

  • RV dealers across North America and Europe

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Recreational vehicles
  • RV design and manufacturing

What could go right

  • Outdoor/camping lifestyle demand

What could go wrong

  • Highly cyclical to discretionary spending
  • Dealer inventory destocking cycles

Moat: narrow (scale, brand, distribution). Multi-brand portfolio and dealer network scale give cost and shelf-space advantages.

Headquarters: Elkhart, Indiana, US · Founded: 1980 · Employees: 19,500

Named competitors

Thor Industries at a glance

Size Thor Industries (THO) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Recreational Products) with a market value of $4.18B, the 1320th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $80.77 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.6%, against +2.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 2.7% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 22.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.9× (6th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +21 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.8 points below its cost of capital (11.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 10.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026THO 108Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: Thor Industries against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Thor Industries financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-07-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$9.61B$9.61B$9.58B$10.0B$11.1B
Revenue growth—0%-5%-10%—
Gross profit$1.10B$1.07B$1.20B$1.59B$1.46B
EBITDA$528M$528M$571M$702M$862M
Net income$178M$178M$259M$265M$374M
Free cash flow$169M$169M$455M$406M$773M
Capital expenditure$152M$152M$123M$140M$208M
Total debt$971M$971M$1.03B$1.25B$1.40B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Thor Industries competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%FDRMATASMDEE-BGOLFPII7951HAYWTGYMCALY7867GAW002292TNIE03030325TOYSL08057906MIPSTHO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Thor Industries is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×60×FDRMATASMDEE-BGOLF7951TGYMCALY002292TNIE03030325TOY7906MIPSTHORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Thor Industries is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%FDRMATASMDEE-BGOLFPIIHAYWTGYM00229203030325TOYMIPSTHOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Thor Industries is the large dot.

Thor Industries competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (THO vs WGO vs PII vs TRI.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Thor Industries THO$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%
Winnebago Industries WGO$892M-1%-3%2%15.8×6.9%
Polaris PII$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%
Trigano TRI.PA$2.93B-16%+2%9%9.4×-6.0%

How Thor Industries compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Thor Industries against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTHOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+22.2%+3.7%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+4.6%+2.1%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-34.2%-18.1%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.3%+7.1%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin2.7%9.8%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E22.3×17.9×6th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.0%2.5%4th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)-4.8%+7.9%lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+20.8 pp-5.2 pp3rd most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.8 pp+3.6 pplowest of 20
EV / EBITDA8.8×11.4×6th cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×-0.0×7th most indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Thor Industries THOUnited States$4.18B+5%0%3%22.3×16.0%-4.8%
Fluidra FDR.MCSpain$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%+8.0%
Mattel MATUnited States$4.39B0%+3%9%12.8×0.2%+3.1%
Asmodee ASMDEE-B.STSweden$3.97B+39%+17%16%17.1×-1.8%+11.9%
Acushnet GOLFUnited States$4.72B-12%+7%13%20.0×3.8%+9.7%
Polaris PIIUnited States$3.59B-8%+9%2%22.2×18.1%+0.4%
Yamaha 7951.TJapan$3.39B+7%+5%8%15.8×-1.7%+4.5%
Hayward HAYWUnited States$3.38B+11%+8%22%17.9×9.9%+5.1%
Technogym S.p.A TGYM.MIItaly$3.34B-32%+10%16%23.8×9.7%+14.9%
Callaway Golf CALYUnited States$3.00B-4%-37%9%18.6×2.4%+5.3%
Tomy 7867.TJapan$2.74B+89%+7%9%20.2×2.5%+13.9%
Games Workshop GAW.LUnited Kingdom$7.15B-17%+7%42%25.2×11.7%+12.3%
Alpha 002292.SZChina$2.08B+13%+2%9%72.3×28.4%+0.9%
tonies TNIE.DEGermany$1.86B+24%+36%4%37.4×n/an/a
VTech 0303.HKHong Kong$1.72B-15%-7%9%11.9×-9.7%-3.0%
Bloks 0325.HKHong Kong$1.56B-23%+30%21%12.4×-1.0%+102.8%
Spin Master TOY.TOCanada$1.52B+6%-2%9%9.6×-11.5%+7.0%
Sanlorenzo SL.MIItaly$1.46B-7%+2%14%11.8×-2.0%+13.7%
New Gonow Recreational Vehicles 0805.HKHong Kong$1.36B+491%+13%2%n/an/an/a
Yonex 7906.TJapan$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/an/a
Mips MIPS.STSweden$1.24B+75%+41%37%47.3×32.9%+7.9%

Questions

Who are Thor Industries's main competitors?
Named competitors: Winnebago Industries (WGO), Forest River (private or unlisted), Polaris (PII), Trigano (TRI.PA), Knaus Tabbert (private or unlisted), REV Group (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Fluidra (FDR.MC), Mattel (MAT), Asmodee (ASMDEE-B.ST), Acushnet (GOLF), Polaris (PII), Yamaha (7951.T).
Is Thor Industries expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 22.3× against a peer median of 17.9×, 6th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +21 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Thor Industries stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.6% against +2.1% for the median peer; over one year -22.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.