Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Yum China Holdings, Inc.YUMCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Operates KFC, Pizza Hut and other restaurant brands across mainland China under an exclusive Yum! Brands license.

≈ China's licensed operator of KFC and Pizza Hut, spun off from Yum! Brands in 2016.Momentum strong 76
Mkt cap
$17.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$89.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.8 pp
WACC 6.2%
Hurdle
-15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · USD$49.95
1D+0.4%
1W+9.1%
1M+19.6%
3M+3.6%
6M+6.5%
YTD+4.6%
1Y+13.9%
ATR %2.5%
Beta0.30
52w lowhigh14.4% off high

What Yum China does

Operates KFC, Pizza Hut and other restaurant brands across mainland China under an exclusive Yum! Brands license.

Earns from restaurants it owns and operates directly, so it books the whole sales line and carries the food, labor and rent costs, with franchised stores a smaller part. It pays Yum! Brands a licence fee based on sales. KFC is far larger than Pizza Hut. It was spun off from Yum! Brands in 2016.

In one line: China's licensed operator of KFC and Pizza Hut, spun off from Yum! Brands in 2016..

Products and services

  • KFC China
  • Pizza Hut China
  • Taco Bell/other emerging brands in China

Customers

  • Chinese quick-service and casual-dining consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Restaurants
  • Quick-service/casual dining in China

What could go right

  • Continued store expansion into lower-tier Chinese cities
  • Digital/loyalty sales mix growth

What could go wrong

  • Chinese consumer spending slowdown
  • Local quick-service competition intensifying

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Dominant KFC/Pizza Hut store network and supply chain across China built over three decades, though local rivals are growing.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 1987 · Employees: 290,000

Named competitors

Yum China at a glance

Size Yum China (YUMC) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $17.1B, the 548th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $49.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.5%, against +11.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 12.7% (peer median 11.5%).

Valuation It trades at 15.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.3× (3rd cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.8 points above its cost of capital (6.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 1.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 111YUMC 105
Six months, rebased to 100: Yum China against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Yum China financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$12.7B$11.8B$11.3B$11.0B$9.57B
Revenue growth—+4%+3%+15%—
Gross profit$2.21B$2.03B$1.89B$1.88B$1.33B
EBITDA$2.09B$1.87B$1.80B$1.70B$1.86B
Net income$1.00B$929M$911M$827M$442M
Free cash flow$964M$840M$714M$763M$734M
Capital expenditure$1.88B$626M$705M$710M$679M
Total debt$3.31B$2.35B$2.41B$2.54B$2.40B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Yum China competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%+40%ARMK7550TXRHDRIDPZSWEATQSRQSP-UN356327026862CAVABROSCAKE3197WINGYUMC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Yum China is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%25×50×75×ARMK7550TXRHDRIDPZSWEAT356327026862CAVACMGBROS3197WINGYUMCRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Yum China is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%ARMK7550TXRHDRIDPZSWEATQSP-UN2702CAVAYUMBROSCAKEWINGYUMCGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Yum China is the large dot.

Yum China competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (YUMC vs YUM vs 6862.HK vs MCD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Yum China YUMC$17.1B+6%+10%13%15.3×-7.5%
Yum! Brands YUM$44.0B+7%+9%32%24.8×-0.2%
Haidilao 6862.HK$7.24B-28%+11%12%11.4×2.0%
McDonald's MCD$196B0%+6%46%20.7×4.1%
Starbucks SBUX$120B+1%+2%11%32.6×18.5%
Restaurant Brands International QSR$35.1B-3%+6%27%18.1×6.3%

How Yum China compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Yum China against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureYUMCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+19.6%+9.9%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+6.5%+11.9%8th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-14.4%-15.6%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.8%+8.6%10th highest of 21
Operating margin12.7%11.5%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E15.3×26.3×3rd cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.5%6.9%least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.4%+13.6%3rd lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-14.9 pp-3.3 ppleast demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.8 pp+6.2 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.3×16.2×2nd cheapest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×3.0×4th least indebted of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Yum China YUMCUnited States$17.1B+6%+10%13%15.3×-7.5%+7.4%
Aramark ARMKUnited States$13.9B+17%+11%4%19.8×16.1%+7.6%
Zensho 7550.TJapan$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%+16.3%
Texas Roadhouse TXRHUnited States$12.1B+4%+10%8%26.8×13.8%+19.6%
Darden Restaurants DRIUnited States$25.6B+15%+8%12%19.7×7.5%+12.9%
Domino's DPZUnited States$11.0B+4%+4%20%16.3×1.8%+3.7%
Sodexo SW.PAFrance$9.91B+28%0%3%17.7×6.0%+6.6%
Brinker International EATUnited States$8.58B+49%+6%11%14.7×9.3%+11.7%
Restaurant Brands International QSRUnited States$35.1B-3%+6%27%18.1×6.3%+13.7%
Restaurant Brands International LP QSP-UN.TOCanada$35.9B+12%+5%28%n/a1.0%+14.6%
Food & Life Companies 3563.TJapan$7.34B+12%+24%10%35.6×6.9%+16.0%
McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan) 2702.TJapan$7.33B+7%+2%14%32.0×1.8%+7.6%
Haidilao 6862.HKHong Kong$7.24B-28%+11%12%11.4×2.0%+7.8%
CAVA CAVAUnited States$6.91B-26%+27%7%85.5×41.5%+27.9%
Chipotle Mexican Grill CMGUnited States$43.6B+6%+8%15%27.1×15.1%+14.8%
Yum! Brands YUMUnited States$44.0B+7%+9%32%24.8×-0.2%+7.8%
Jersey Mike's Subs JMKEUnited States$6.03Bn/a+11%21%26.3×n/an/a
Dutch Bros BROSUnited States$5.90B-36%+30%10%31.0×36.3%+38.0%
Cheesecake Factory CAKEUnited States$5.32B+73%+8%7%21.2×16.7%+13.6%
Skylark 3197.TJapan$5.18B+19%+11%7%38.5×6.4%+9.7%
Wingstop WINGUnited States$4.42B+26%+7%28%35.3×21.9%+22.9%

Questions

Who are Yum China's main competitors?
Named competitors: Yum! Brands (YUM), Haidilao International (6862.HK), Jiumaojiu International Holdings (private or unlisted), McDonald's (MCD), Starbucks (SBUX), Restaurant Brands International (QSR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aramark (ARMK), Zensho (7550.T), Texas Roadhouse (TXRH), Darden Restaurants (DRI), Domino's (DPZ), Sodexo (SW.PA).
Is Yum China expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.3× against a peer median of 26.3×, 3rd cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Yum China stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.5% against +11.9% for the median peer; over one year +13.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.