Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › QSR Restaurant Brands International, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Restaurant Brands International, Inc.QSRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Franchisor of Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, operating an asset-light global restaurant network.

Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$35.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$225M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.9 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
102 days
16 Feb 2027
Close · USD$77.69
1D-1.1%
1W+7.3%
1M+9.9%
3M+6.6%
6M-2.5%
YTD+13.9%
1Y+15.9%
ATR %2.6%
Beta0.12
52w lowhigh5.2% off high

What Restaurant Brands International does

Franchisor of Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, operating an asset-light global restaurant network.

Collects royalties as a share of franchisees' sales, plus rent and supply sales, so it earns from system sales rather than restaurant profits. Abroad it relies on master franchisees, who develop whole countries. In 2024 it bought Carrols, its largest US Burger King franchisee, to rebuild and refurbish stores.

Products and services

  • Burger King
  • Tim Hortons
  • Popeyes
  • Firehouse Subs

Customers

  • Mass-market quick-service consumers, especially in

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Restaurants
  • Multi-brand quick-service franchisor

What could go right

  • Burger King US turnaround execution
  • Tim Hortons Canada same-store sales growth

What could go wrong

  • Burger King US brand/traffic underperformance
  • Franchisee profitability pressure

Moat: narrow (brand, scale). Recognized multi-brand portfolio with franchised, asset-light royalty economics; Burger King has lagged McDonald's in the US.

Headquarters: Toronto, Canada · Founded: 1954 · Employees: 53,500

Named competitors

Restaurant Brands International at a glance

Size Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $35.1B, the 326th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $77.69 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.5%, against +6.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.1%); the operating margin is 27.3% (peer median 12.2%).

Valuation It trades at 18.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.3× (4th cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.9 points above its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $494M at 30 Sep 2026, down 3% on a year earlier — 0.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 4.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 108QSR 99
Six months, rebased to 100: Restaurant Brands International against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Restaurant Brands International financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$9.78B$9.43B$8.41B$7.02B$6.50B
Revenue growth—+12%+20%+8%—
Gross profit$4.78B$4.55B$4.35B$4.07B$3.64B
EBITDA$2.98B$2.80B$2.59B$2.34B$2.22B
Net income$1.50B$776M$1.02B$1.19B$1.01B
Free cash flow$1.46B$1.35B$1.30B$1.16B$1.39B
Capital expenditure$279M$265M$201M$120M$100M
Total debt$15.7B$15.7B$15.9B$14.5B$14.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Restaurant Brands International competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%0%+10%+20%QSP-UNCMGYUMDRIYUMCARMK7550TXRHDPZSBUXSWQSR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Restaurant Brands International is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%20×30×CMGYUMDRIYUMCARMK7550TXRHDPZSBUXSWQSRRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Restaurant Brands International is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%QSP-UNCMGYUMDRIYUMCARMK7550TXRHDPZSBUXSWQSRGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Restaurant Brands International is the large dot.

Restaurant Brands International competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (QSR vs MCD vs YUM vs WEN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Restaurant Brands International QSR$35.1B-3%+6%27%18.1×6.3%
McDonald's MCD$196B0%+6%46%20.7×4.1%
Yum! Brands YUM$44.0B+7%+9%32%24.8×-0.2%
Wendy's WEN$1.55B+12%-1%13%17.9×2.4%

How Restaurant Brands International compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Restaurant Brands International against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureQSRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.9%+10.9%5th lowest of 12
6-month return-2.5%+6.6%lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-5.2%-7.0%4th highest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.5%+8.1%5th lowest of 12
Operating margin27.3%12.2%3rd highest of 12
Forward P/E18.1×22.3×4th cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.3%6.1%6th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.7%+7.8%5th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-7.4 pp-5.4 pp5th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.9 pp+7.6 pp3rd lowest of 12
EV / EBITDA17.2×15.5×5th most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA4.9×3.1×2nd most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Restaurant Brands International QSRUnited States$35.1B-3%+6%27%18.1×6.3%+13.7%
Restaurant Brands International LP QSP-UN.TOCanada$35.9B+12%+5%28%n/a1.0%+14.6%
Chipotle Mexican Grill CMGUnited States$43.6B+6%+8%15%27.1×15.1%+14.8%
Yum! Brands YUMUnited States$44.0B+7%+9%32%24.8×-0.2%+7.8%
Darden Restaurants DRIUnited States$25.6B+15%+8%12%19.7×7.5%+12.9%
Yum China YUMCUnited States$17.1B+6%+10%13%15.3×-7.5%+7.4%
Aramark ARMKUnited States$13.9B+17%+11%4%19.8×16.1%+7.6%
Zensho 7550.TJapan$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%+16.3%
Texas Roadhouse TXRHUnited States$12.1B+4%+10%8%26.8×13.8%+19.6%
Domino's DPZUnited States$11.0B+4%+4%20%16.3×1.8%+3.7%
Starbucks SBUXUnited States$120B+1%+2%11%32.6×18.5%+5.5%
Sodexo SW.PAFrance$9.91B+28%0%3%17.7×6.0%+6.6%

Restaurant Brands International backlog

Restaurant Brands International reported $494M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 3% from a year earlier and down 0% from the previous quarter. That is 0.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.00.

Questions

Who are Restaurant Brands International's main competitors?
Named competitors: McDonald's (MCD), Yum! Brands (YUM), Wendy's (WEN), Chick-fil-A (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Restaurant Brands International LP (QSP-UN.TO), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Darden Restaurants (DRI), Yum China (YUMC), Aramark (ARMK).
Is Restaurant Brands International expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.1× against a peer median of 22.3×, 4th cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Restaurant Brands International stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.5% against +6.6% for the median peer; over one year +15.9%.
What is Restaurant Brands International's backlog?
Restaurant Brands International's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $494M at 30 Sep 2026, -3% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.