Loading…

AramarkARMKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Provides outsourced food, facilities and uniform services to businesses, schools, hospitals, sports venues and prisons.

Momentum neutral 58
Mkt cap
$13.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$183M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.5 pp
WACC 8.8%
Hurdle
+8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB / BB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
10 days
16 Nov 2026
Close · USD$52.54
1D+4.5%
1W-2.6%
1M-5.4%
3M-5.7%
6M+16.6%
YTD+42.5%
1Y+39.4%
ATR %3.4%
Beta0.64
52w lowhigh16.1% off high

What Aramark does

Provides outsourced food, facilities and uniform services to businesses, schools, hospitals, sports venues and prisons.

Clients are institutions that outsource dining and facilities, paying either a fixed price or costs plus a fee, so profit depends on controlling food and labor costs. It spun off its uniform business as Vestis in 2023, which leaves it mostly food and facilities.

Products and services

  • Food and dining services (workplaces, education, healthcare)
  • Sports/entertainment/leisure concessions
  • Uniform and career apparel services
  • Facilities/janitorial services

Customers

  • Corporations, universities, hospitals, stadiums, c

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Food services
  • Contract foodservice/facilities…

What could go right

  • Outsourcing trend among institutions
  • Sports/entertainment venue contract wins

What could go wrong

  • Labor and food-cost inflation
  • Contract renewal/pricing competition

Moat: narrow (scale, switching costs, installed base). Long-term outsourcing contracts and embedded on-site operations create real switching costs for clients.

Headquarters: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States · Founded: 1959 · Employees: 278,390

Named competitors

Aramark at a glance

Size Aramark (ARMK) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $13.9B, the 638th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $52.54 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 16.6%, against +7.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 4.4% (peer median 12.0%).

Valuation It trades at 19.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.3× (8th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.5 points below its cost of capital (8.8% WACC).

Credit Aramark has 2 bonds outstanding ($1.60B), rated BB by the agencies and trading like BB- at a weighted spread of 236 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ARMK 118Peer median 108
Six months, rebased to 100: Aramark against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aramark financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$19.8B$18.5B$17.4B$16.1B$16.3B
Revenue growth—+6%+8%-1%—
Gross profit$1.17B$1.13B$1.00B$885M$1.06B
EBITDA$1.39B$1.32B$1.15B$1.05B$1.18B
Net income$383M$326M$263M$674M$194M
Free cash flow$433M$432M$299M$383M$306M
Capital expenditure$478M$489M$427M$384M$388M
Total debt$6.47B$5.72B$5.57B$6.94B$7.79B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aramark competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%+40%7550TXRHYUMCDPZSWEATDRI356327026862CAVABROSQSRQSP-UNCAKE3197WINGARMK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aramark is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%25×50×75×7550TXRHYUMCDPZSWEATDRI356327026862CAVABROSQSR3197WINGARMKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aramark is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%7550TXRHYUMCDPZSWEATDRI2702CAVABROSQSP-UNCAKEWINGYUMARMKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Aramark is the large dot.

Aramark competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ARMK vs COMP vs SW.PA vs CTAS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Aramark ARMK$13.9B+17%+11%4%19.8×16.1%
Compass COMP$7.84B+17%+68%0%n/an/a
Sodexo SW.PA$9.91B+28%0%3%17.7×6.0%
Cintas CTAS$88.3B+34%+10%24%38.9×18.2%

How Aramark compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aramark against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureARMKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.4%+10.1%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return+16.6%+7.1%7th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-16.1%-14.7%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.0%+8.6%6th highest of 21
Operating margin4.4%12.0%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E19.8×26.3×8th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.1%6.4%5th most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.6%+13.6%4th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+8.5 pp-5.4 pp2nd most demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.5 pp+6.4 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA14.3×16.2×6th cheapest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA4.2×2.5×7th most indebted of 21
Bond spread236 bp90 bpwidest of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Aramark ARMKUnited States$13.9B+17%+11%4%19.8×16.1%+7.6%
Zensho 7550.TJapan$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%+16.3%
Texas Roadhouse TXRHUnited States$12.1B+4%+10%8%26.8×13.8%+19.6%
Yum China YUMCUnited States$17.1B+6%+10%13%15.3×-7.5%+7.4%
Domino's DPZUnited States$11.0B+4%+4%20%16.3×1.8%+3.7%
Sodexo SW.PAFrance$9.91B+28%0%3%17.7×6.0%+6.6%
Brinker International EATUnited States$8.58B+49%+6%11%14.7×9.3%+11.7%
Darden Restaurants DRIUnited States$25.6B+15%+8%12%19.7×7.5%+12.9%
Food & Life Companies 3563.TJapan$7.34B+12%+24%10%35.6×6.9%+16.0%
McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan) 2702.TJapan$7.33B+7%+2%14%32.0×1.8%+7.6%
Haidilao 6862.HKHong Kong$7.24B-28%+11%12%11.4×2.0%+7.8%
CAVA CAVAUnited States$6.91B-26%+27%7%85.5×41.5%+27.9%
Jersey Mike's Subs JMKEUnited States$6.03Bn/a+11%21%26.3×n/an/a
Dutch Bros BROSUnited States$5.90B-36%+30%10%31.0×36.3%+38.0%
Restaurant Brands International QSRUnited States$35.1B-3%+6%27%18.1×6.3%+13.7%
Restaurant Brands International LP QSP-UN.TOCanada$35.9B+12%+5%28%n/a1.0%+14.6%
Cheesecake Factory CAKEUnited States$5.32B+73%+8%7%21.2×16.7%+13.6%
Skylark 3197.TJapan$5.18B+19%+11%7%38.5×6.4%+9.7%
Wingstop WINGUnited States$4.42B+26%+7%28%35.3×21.9%+22.9%
Chipotle Mexican Grill CMGUnited States$43.6B+6%+8%15%27.1×15.1%+14.8%
Yum! Brands YUMUnited States$44.0B+7%+9%32%24.8×-0.2%+7.8%

Aramark bonds and credit

Aramark has 2 bonds outstanding with $1.60B face value. The agencies rate it BB; its bonds trade like BB-. Weighted yield 6.35%, a spread of 236 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Aramark's main competitors?
Named competitors: Compass Group (COMP), Sodexo (SW.PA), Cintas (CTAS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zensho (7550.T), Texas Roadhouse (TXRH), Yum China (YUMC), Domino's (DPZ), Sodexo (SW.PA), Brinker International (EAT).
Is Aramark expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.8× against a peer median of 26.3×, 8th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Aramark stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +16.6% against +7.1% for the median peer; over one year +39.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.