Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › EAT Brinker International, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Brinker International, Inc.EATCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Owns and franchises Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy casual-dining restaurant chains.

Momentum leader 83
Mkt cap
$8.58B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$290M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.5 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · USD$206.57
1D-2.9%
1W-2.6%
1M+8.6%
3M-9.2%
6M+49.0%
YTD+43.9%
1Y+99.5%
ATR %5.3%
Beta0.83
52w lowhigh19.0% off high

What Brinker International does

Owns and franchises Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy casual-dining restaurant chains.

Most revenue is food and drink sales at company-owned restaurants, so results depend on guest traffic and spend per visit, with franchise royalties adding a small fee stream. Chili's supplies most of the sales, and Maggiano's is a smaller dining and banquet business. Delivery and takeout are sold through the same kitchens.

Products and services

  • Chili's Grill & Bar
  • Maggiano's Little Italy
  • Franchised international units

Customers

  • Value-oriented casual-dining consumers in the US

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Restaurants
  • Casual-dining bar-and-grill

What could go right

  • Chili's value positioning driving traffic
  • Off-premises/digital sales growth

What could go wrong

  • Casual-dining category traffic sensitivity
  • Labor and food-cost inflation

Moat: narrow (brand). Recognizable Chili's brand and recent value-menu/turnaround momentum, but casual dining is intensely competitive.

Headquarters: Dallas, Texas, United States · Founded: 1975 · Employees: 85,003

Named competitors

Brinker International at a glance

Size Brinker International (EAT) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $8.58B, the 856th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $206.57 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 49.0%, against +12.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.3%); the operating margin is 11.2% (peer median 9.6%).

Valuation It trades at 14.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 28.9× (3rd cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.5 points above its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $8.60M at 23 Sep 2026, down 10% on a year earlier — 0.0 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 11.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026EAT 148Peer median 111
Six months, rebased to 100: Brinker International against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Brinker International financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$5.93B$5.81B$5.38B$4.42B$4.13B
Revenue growth—+8%+22%+7%—
Gross profit$905M$864M$776M$456M$332M
EBITDA$884M$847M$760M$444M$346M
Net income$501M$487M$383M$155M$103M
Free cash flow$601M$558M$414M$223M$71.4M
Capital expenditure$237M$232M$265M$199M$185M
Total debt$1.80B$1.76B$1.69B$2.00B$2.16B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Brinker International competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%+40%SW356327026862CAVADPZTXRH7550BROSCAKEARMK3197WINGYUMCJUBLFOODSHAKDRI3397EAT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Brinker International is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+10%+20%20×40×60×SW356327026862CAVADPZTXRHJMKE7550BROSCAKEARMK3197WINGYUMCJUBLFOODSHAK3397MABEATRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Brinker International is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%SW356327026862CAVATXRH7550BROSCAKEARMKWINGYUMCJUBLFOODMABEATGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Brinker International is the large dot.

Brinker International competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (EAT vs DRI vs TXRH vs BLMN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Brinker International EAT$8.58B+49%+6%11%14.7×9.3%
Darden Restaurants DRI$25.6B+15%+8%12%19.7×7.5%
Texas Roadhouse TXRH$12.1B+4%+10%8%26.8×13.8%
Bloomin' Brands BLMN$835M+23%-2%3%10.5×10.6%
Dine Brands Global DIN$454M+26%+8%14%7.9×n/a

How Brinker International compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Brinker International against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureEATPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.6%+10.5%8th lowest of 21
6-month return+49.0%+12.2%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-19.0%-15.6%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.1%+10.3%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin11.2%9.6%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E14.7×28.9×3rd cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.3%6.6%8th most demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.7%+13.3%8th lowest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.5 pp-4.3 pp9th most demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.5 pp+5.5 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA11.7×14.6×7th cheapest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×2.4×9th least indebted of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Brinker International EATUnited States$8.58B+49%+6%11%14.7×9.3%+11.7%
Sodexo SW.PAFrance$9.91B+28%0%3%17.7×6.0%+6.6%
Food & Life Companies 3563.TJapan$7.34B+12%+24%10%35.6×6.9%+16.0%
McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan) 2702.TJapan$7.33B+7%+2%14%32.0×1.8%+7.6%
Haidilao 6862.HKHong Kong$7.24B-28%+11%12%11.4×2.0%+7.8%
CAVA CAVAUnited States$6.91B-26%+27%7%85.5×41.5%+27.9%
Domino's DPZUnited States$11.0B+4%+4%20%16.3×1.8%+3.7%
Texas Roadhouse TXRHUnited States$12.1B+4%+10%8%26.8×13.8%+19.6%
Jersey Mike's Subs JMKEUnited States$6.03Bn/a+11%21%26.3×n/an/a
Zensho 7550.TJapan$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%+16.3%
Dutch Bros BROSUnited States$5.90B-36%+30%10%31.0×36.3%+38.0%
Cheesecake Factory CAKEUnited States$5.32B+73%+8%7%21.2×16.7%+13.6%
Aramark ARMKUnited States$13.9B+17%+11%4%19.8×16.1%+7.6%
Skylark 3197.TJapan$5.18B+19%+11%7%38.5×6.4%+9.7%
Wingstop WINGUnited States$4.42B+26%+7%28%35.3×21.9%+22.9%
Yum China YUMCUnited States$17.1B+6%+10%13%15.3×-7.5%+7.4%
Jubilant Foodworks JUBLFOOD.NSIndia$3.20B-5%+16%10%61.4×28.6%+23.5%
Shake Shack SHAKUnited States$3.08B+2%+17%5%55.7×n/an/a
Darden Restaurants DRIUnited States$25.6B+15%+8%12%19.7×7.5%+12.9%
TORIDOLL 3397.TJapan$2.68B+19%+3%7%57.7×5.9%+15.6%
Mitchells & Butlers MAB.LUnited Kingdom$2.56B+25%+3%12%10.2×4.7%+12.9%

Brinker International backlog

Brinker International reported $8.60M of remaining performance obligations at 23 Sep 2026, down 10% from a year earlier. That is 0.0 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are Brinker International's main competitors?
Named competitors: Darden Restaurants (DRI), Texas Roadhouse (TXRH), Bloomin' Brands (BLMN), Dine Brands (Applebee's) (DIN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sodexo (SW.PA), Food & Life Companies (3563.T), McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan) (2702.T), Haidilao (6862.HK), CAVA (CAVA), Domino's (DPZ).
Is Brinker International expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.7× against a peer median of 28.9×, 3rd cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Brinker International stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +49.0% against +12.2% for the median peer; over one year +99.5%.
What is Brinker International's backlog?
Brinker International's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $8.60M at 23 Sep 2026, -10% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.