Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3197.T Skylark Holdings Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Skylark Holdings Co., Ltd.3197.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Japan's largest family-restaurant chain operator, running Gusto, Bamiyan, Jonathan's and other casual-dining brands.

≈ Japan's Denny's/Applebee's parent, at much larger scaleMomentum leader 89
Mkt cap
$5.18B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$24.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
38.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,593
1D-5.6%
1W+2.1%
1M+12.3%
3M+12.6%
6M+19.4%
YTD+6.8%
1Y+22.7%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh6.7% off high

What Skylark does

Japan's largest family-restaurant chain operator, running Gusto, Bamiyan, Jonathan's and other casual-dining brands.

Runs most of its restaurants itself rather than through franchisees, so profit rests on customer visits, spend per visit and food and labour costs, which have both risen in Japan. Spreading purchasing over a network of thousands of outlets across its brands helps hold costs.

In one line: Japan's Denny's/Applebee's parent, at much larger scale.

Products and services

  • Gusto
  • Bamiyan (Chinese cuisine)
  • Jonathan's
  • Steak Gusto
  • Karaoke-kan

Customers

  • Families and casual diners nationwide

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Restaurants
  • Multi-brand casual dining

What could go right

  • Recovery in dine-out frequency
  • Cost efficiency from scale

What could go wrong

  • Labor shortage/wage inflation
  • Food input cost inflation

Moat: narrow (scale, brand). Largest restaurant network in Japan gives purchasing scale and prime site access.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1970 · Employees: 6,744

Named competitors

Skylark at a glance

Size Skylark (3197.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $5.18B, the 236th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,593 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 19.4%, against +14.3% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.3%); the operating margin is 7.3% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 38.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 28.9× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263197.T 119Peer median 113
Six months, rebased to 100: Skylark against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Skylark financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥479B¥458B¥401B¥355B¥304B
Revenue growth—+14%+13%+17%—
Gross profit¥319B¥257B¥226B¥195B¥163B
EBITDA¥89.0B¥85.3B¥72.2B¥65.2B¥38.9B
Net income¥19.0B¥16.7B¥14.0B¥4.78B-¥6.37B
Free cash flow¥50.8B¥50.3B¥52.7B¥57.3B¥32.2B
Capital expenditure¥29.3B¥24.8B¥17.0B¥14.8B¥15.8B
Total debt¥137B¥248B¥220B¥199B¥208B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Skylark competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%0%+20%+40%CAKEBROSWINGCAVA686227023563JUBLFOODEATSHAKSW3397MAB7581DPZ3387TXRH7550ARMK3197.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Skylark is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+10%+20%20×40×60×CAKEBROSJMKEWINGCAVA686227023563JUBLFOODEATSHAKSW3397MAB758133877550ARMK3197.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Skylark is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0%20%40%CAKEBROSWINGCAVA686227023563JUBLFOODEATSW3397MAB7581DPZ3387TXRHARMK3197.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Skylark is the large dot.

Skylark competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3197.T vs 7550.T vs 7581.T vs 9861.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Skylark 3197.T$5.18B+19%+11%7%38.5×6.4%
Zensho 7550.T$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%
Saizeriya 7581.T$2.52B+60%+17%5%26.9×4.6%
Yoshinoya 9861.T$1.84B+42%+10%4%45.5×11.2%
Colowide 7616.T$1.51B+21%+16%4%n/a13.6%

How Skylark compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Skylark against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3197.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.3%+9.4%6th highest of 21
6-month return+19.4%+14.3%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-6.7%-16.6%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.3%+10.3%8th highest of 21
Operating margin7.3%8.9%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E38.5×28.9×6th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.4%8.1%9th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.7%+15.8%6th lowest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.3 pp-2.2 pp9th least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.1 pp+6.2 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA10.4×14.6×6th cheapest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×2.2×5th least indebted of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Skylark 3197.TJapan$5.18B+19%+11%7%38.5×6.4%+9.7%
Cheesecake Factory CAKEUnited States$5.32B+73%+8%7%21.2×16.7%+13.6%
Dutch Bros BROSUnited States$5.90B-36%+30%10%31.0×36.3%+38.0%
Jersey Mike's Subs JMKEUnited States$6.03Bn/a+11%21%26.3×n/an/a
Wingstop WINGUnited States$4.42B+26%+7%28%35.3×21.9%+22.9%
CAVA CAVAUnited States$6.91B-26%+27%7%85.5×41.5%+27.9%
Haidilao 6862.HKHong Kong$7.24B-28%+11%12%11.4×2.0%+7.8%
McDonald's Holdings Company (Japan) 2702.TJapan$7.33B+7%+2%14%32.0×1.8%+7.6%
Food & Life Companies 3563.TJapan$7.34B+12%+24%10%35.6×6.9%+16.0%
Jubilant Foodworks JUBLFOOD.NSIndia$3.20B-5%+16%10%61.4×28.6%+23.5%
Brinker International EATUnited States$8.58B+49%+6%11%14.7×9.3%+11.7%
Shake Shack SHAKUnited States$3.08B+2%+17%5%55.7×n/an/a
Sodexo SW.PAFrance$9.91B+28%0%3%17.7×6.0%+6.6%
TORIDOLL 3397.TJapan$2.68B+19%+3%7%57.7×5.9%+15.6%
Mitchells & Butlers MAB.LUnited Kingdom$2.56B+25%+3%12%10.2×4.7%+12.9%
Saizeriya 7581.TJapan$2.52B+60%+17%5%26.9×4.6%+19.0%
Domino's DPZUnited States$11.0B+4%+4%20%16.3×1.8%+3.7%
create restaurants 3387.TJapan$2.34B+14%+3%5%65.7×17.8%+17.3%
Texas Roadhouse TXRHUnited States$12.1B+4%+10%8%26.8×13.8%+19.6%
Zensho 7550.TJapan$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%+16.3%
Aramark ARMKUnited States$13.9B+17%+11%4%19.8×16.1%+7.6%

Questions

Who are Skylark's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zensho Holdings (7550.T), Saizeriya (7581.T), Yoshinoya Holdings (9861.T), Colowide (7616.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Dutch Bros (BROS), Jersey Mike's Subs (JMKE), Wingstop (WING), CAVA (CAVA), Haidilao (6862.HK).
Is Skylark expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 38.5× against a peer median of 28.9×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Skylark stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +19.4% against +14.3% for the median peer; over one year +22.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.