Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3923.T RAKUS Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

RAKUS Co., Ltd.3923.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Japanese provider of cloud-based business software including expense management and webmail for SMBs.

≈ A Japanese Concur/Expensify combined with a business email SaaSMomentum leader 80
Mkt cap
$2.38B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
44%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+61.4 pp
WACC 10.2%
Hurdle
-16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,060
1D-7.0%
1W-3.0%
1M+1.2%
3M+2.2%
6M+23.7%
YTD+1.9%
1Y-16.7%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh20.3% off high

What RAKUS does

Japanese provider of cloud-based business software including expense management and webmail for SMBs.

Customers pay a subscription, priced per user, so revenue builds from a base that renews each period; the expense-settlement product carries the most. Additional modules sold to the same customers are the main way each account grows.

In one line: A Japanese Concur/Expensify combined with a business email SaaS.

Products and services

  • Expense management SaaS
  • Business webmail/cloud PBX
  • IT asset management software

Customers

  • Small and mid-size Japanese businesses

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information technology
  • Cloud/SaaS software
  • Expense management, webmail, cloud PBX…

What could go right

  • SMB cloud software adoption growth

What could go wrong

  • Competition from larger SaaS platforms

Moat: narrow (switching costs, installed base). Recurring SaaS subscriptions embedded in customer workflows create moderate switching costs.

Headquarters: Osaka, Japan · Founded: 2000 · Employees: 3,569

Named competitors

RAKUS at a glance

Size RAKUS (3923.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $2.38B, the 427th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,060 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 23.7%, against +10.2% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.6%); the operating margin is 30.5% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 14.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.6× (6th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +31%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 61.4 points above its cost of capital (10.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263923.T 123Peer median 113
Six months, rebased to 100: RAKUS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

RAKUS financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥60.4B¥60.3B¥48.9B¥38.4B¥27.4B
Revenue growth—+23%+27%+40%—
Gross profit¥46.4B¥45.4B¥36.3B¥27.6B¥18.8B
EBITDA¥19.7B¥18.6B¥11.3B¥6.44B¥2.23B
Net income¥24.4B¥13.3B¥8.00B¥4.18B¥1.27B
Free cash flown/a¥12.3B¥7.74B¥4.47B¥1.54B
Capital expendituren/a¥1.05B¥1.36B¥854M¥634M
Total debt¥0¥0¥216M¥970M¥36.0M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

RAKUS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%NCNOPLUSAFFLEASANBLKB300738688507NTCT13573994SDGRURBANCO002405LIFE000158DVPBIFIVNAMPL0013393923.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. RAKUS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×1,000×2,000×NCNOPLUSBLKB3007386885073994LIFEPBIAMPL0013393923.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. RAKUS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%NCNOPLUSAFFLEASANBLKBNTCT1357DVPBIFIVNAMPL3923.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. RAKUS is the large dot.

RAKUS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3923.T vs 3994.T vs 4443.T vs 4478.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
RAKUS 3923.T$2.38B+24%+17%31%14.1×15.8%
Money Forward 3994.T$2.52B+51%+35%2%2,235.1×n/a
Sansan 4443.T$1.67B+65%+22%18%27.4×20.3%
freee K.K 4478.T$1.72B+100%+28%3%79.1×n/a
Cybozu 4776.T$862M+43%+20%27%16.8×-2.8%
OBIC Business Consultants 4733.T$4.74B+62%+12%47%36.1×3.2%

How RAKUS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

RAKUS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3923.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.2%+2.2%11th highest of 21
6-month return+23.7%+10.2%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-20.3%-24.5%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.7%+16.6%11th highest of 21
Operating margin30.5%6.5%highest of 21
Forward P/E14.1×21.6×6th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.8%10.2%6th most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+31.4%+23.8%2nd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.6 pp-5.2 pp3rd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+61.4 pp-1.3 pphighest of 18
EV / EBITDA18.0×10.0×4th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.0×-0.2×4th least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
RAKUS 3923.TJapan$2.38B+24%+17%31%14.1×15.8%+31.4%
nCino NCNOUnited States$2.40B+28%+9%9%15.8×23.9%+23.8%
ePlus PLUSUnited States$2.40B+2%+15%7%16.1×4.3%+9.5%
Affle 3i AFFLE.NSIndia$2.36B+6%+20%18%40.0×33.0%+39.3%
Asana ASANUnited States$2.43B+60%+9%-15%27.4×10.7%+28.4%
Blackbaud BLKBUnited States$2.43B+44%+2%21%9.4×-1.6%+4.3%
Guangdong Aofei Data Technology 300738.SZChina$2.44B-34%+24%23%42.6×n/an/a
Shanghai Suochen Information Technology 688507.SSChina$2.31B+97%+32%-2%196.7×n/an/a
NetScout Systems NTCTUnited States$2.29B-19%+6%15%11.6×-0.1%+0.7%
Meitu 1357.HKHong Kong$2.50B-9%+24%24%12.8×7.5%+25.5%
Money Forward 3994.TJapan$2.52B+51%+35%2%2,235.1×n/an/a
Schrodinger SDGRUnited States$2.23B+125%+9%-59%n/an/an/a
Urban URBANCO.NSIndia$2.58B+8%+36%-26%n/an/an/a
SeeWay.ai 002405.SZChina$2.18B-32%+22%-29%n/an/an/a
Ethos Technologies LIFEUnited States$2.18B+13%+112%-16%33.9×24.1%n/a
Shijiazhuang Changshan Beiming Technology 000158.SZChina$2.64B-35%-14%2%n/an/an/a
DoubleVerify DVUnited States$2.12B+23%+7%14%21.3×9.7%+25.1%
Pitney Bowes PBIUnited States$2.11B-1%-4%25%9.6×-5.4%-11.8%
Five9 FIVNUnited States$2.10B+27%+9%6%8.1×17.9%+21.4%
Amplitude AMPLUnited States$2.09B+161%+18%-27%109.2×36.9%+27.4%
JWIPC Technology 001339.SZChina$2.72B-19%+41%21%21.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are RAKUS's main competitors?
Named competitors: Money Forward (3994.T), Sansan (4443.T), Concur (SAP) (private or unlisted), freee (4478.T), Cybozu (4776.T), Obic Business Consultants (4733.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes nCino (NCNO), ePlus (PLUS), Affle 3i (AFFLE.NS), Asana (ASAN), Blackbaud (BLKB), Guangdong Aofei Data Technology (300738.SZ).
Is RAKUS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.1× against a peer median of 21.6×, 6th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +31%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has RAKUS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +23.7% against +10.2% for the median peer; over one year -16.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.