Loading…

Meitu, Inc1357.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Chinese maker of photo and video editing apps (Meitu, BeautyCam) with AI-powered beautification and image-generation tools.

≈ China's answer to a Canva/Facetune combined app makerMomentum strong 72
Mkt cap
$2.50B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$25.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+14.9 pp
WACC 11.7%
Hurdle
-18 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$4.28
1D-1.3%
1W+13.5%
1M+15.5%
3M-9.9%
6M-9.3%
YTD-38.9%
1Y-48.1%
ATR %5.0%
52w lowhigh54.1% off high

What Meitu does

Chinese maker of photo and video editing apps (Meitu, BeautyCam) with AI-powered beautification and image-generation tools.

Moved from selling phones, a business it handed to Xiaomi in 2018, to selling software, and now earns increasingly from paid subscriptions to its editing apps, with in-app advertising and enterprise tools as smaller lines.

In one line: China's answer to a Canva/Facetune combined app maker.

Products and services

  • Meitu photo/video editing apps
  • AI image generation tools
  • Advertising within apps
  • Enterprise beauty/AI SaaS

Customers

  • Consumers (photo editing app users)
  • Beauty/e-commerce enterprise clients (SaaS tools)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Consumer apps
  • Photo/video editing & AI imaging

What could go right

  • AI-content-creation feature monetization

What could go wrong

  • App-monetization/ad-market volatility
  • Competition from AI image tools (Canva, Adobe)

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base, data). Large installed base of photo/beauty app users in China, with growing AI-generation feature differentiation.

Headquarters: Xiamen, China · Founded: 2008 · Employees: 2,103

Named competitors

Meitu at a glance

Size Meitu (1357.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $2.50B, the 379th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$4.28 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.3%, against +7.0% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +15.9%); the operating margin is 24.1% (peer median 6.0%).

Valuation It trades at 12.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.7× (4th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +26%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.9 points above its cost of capital (11.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1091357.HK 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Meitu against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Meitu financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$4.75BHK$4.18BHK$3.25BHK$2.98BHK$2.42B
Revenue growth—+29%+9%+23%—
Gross profitHK$3.48BHK$3.08BHK$2.47BHK$1.80BHK$1.36B
EBITDAn/aHK$1.00BHK$622MHK$404MHK$72.8M
Net incomeHK$910MHK$632MHK$873MHK$418MHK$109M
Free cash flowHK$1.63BHK$1.46BHK$826MHK$399MHK$213M
Capital expenditureHK$40.8MHK$52.2MHK$57.1MHK$62.3MHK$59.2M
Total debtn/aHK$1.83BHK$339MHK$248MHK$42.8M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Meitu competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%3994300738BLKBASANURBANCOPLUSNCNO3923000158AFFLE001339688507NTCT2400VERXSDGR603171TATATECH002405LIFE1357.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Meitu is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×1,000×2,000×3994300738BLKBASAN001339688507TATATECHLIFE1357.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Meitu is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%BLKBASANPLUSNCNO3923AFFLENTCT2400VERX603171TATATECH1357.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Meitu is the large dot.

Meitu competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1357.HK vs ADBE vs 1024.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Meitu 1357.HK$2.50B-9%+24%24%12.8×7.5%
Adobe ADBE$93.1B-5%+12%36%8.9×0.9%
Kuaishou-w 1024.HK$16.0B-39%+11%11%14.9×-4.4%

How Meitu compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Meitu against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1357.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+15.5%+5.7%6th highest of 21
6-month return-9.3%+7.0%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-54.1%-27.9%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.4%+15.9%6th highest of 21
Operating margin24.1%6.0%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E12.8×24.7×4th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.5%19.9%5th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+25.5%+14.8%4th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-18.0 pp-5.2 ppleast demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.9 pp-1.2 pp4th highest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Meitu 1357.HKHong Kong$2.50B-9%+24%24%12.8×7.5%+25.5%
Money Forward 3994.TJapan$2.52B+51%+35%2%2,235.1×n/an/a
Guangdong Aofei Data Technology 300738.SZChina$2.44B-34%+24%23%42.6×n/an/a
Blackbaud BLKBUnited States$2.43B+44%+2%21%9.4×-1.6%+4.3%
Asana ASANUnited States$2.43B+60%+9%-15%27.4×10.7%+28.4%
Urban URBANCO.NSIndia$2.58B+8%+36%-26%n/an/an/a
ePlus PLUSUnited States$2.40B+2%+15%7%16.1×4.3%+9.5%
nCino NCNOUnited States$2.40B+28%+9%9%15.8×23.9%+23.8%
RAKUS 3923.TJapan$2.38B+24%+17%31%14.1×15.8%+31.4%
Shijiazhuang Changshan Beiming Technology 000158.SZChina$2.64B-35%-14%2%n/an/an/a
Affle 3i AFFLE.NSIndia$2.36B+6%+20%18%40.0×33.0%+39.3%
JWIPC Technology 001339.SZChina$2.72B-19%+41%21%21.9×n/an/a
Shanghai Suochen Information Technology 688507.SSChina$2.31B+97%+32%-2%196.7×n/an/a
NetScout Systems NTCTUnited States$2.29B-19%+6%15%11.6×-0.1%+0.7%
XD, Inc. 2400.HKHong Kong$2.77B-28%+6%26%11.9×3.0%+14.3%
Vertex VERXUnited States$2.77B+14%+11%1%17.4×57.9%+14.8%
Schrodinger SDGRUnited States$2.23B+125%+9%-59%n/an/an/a
Servyou Software 603171.SSChina$2.84B-16%+6%5%72.7×40.3%+5.9%
Tata Technologies TATATECH.NSIndia$2.86B+6%+22%13%34.9×28.3%+18.3%
SeeWay.ai 002405.SZChina$2.18B-32%+22%-29%n/an/an/a
Ethos Technologies LIFEUnited States$2.18B+13%+112%-16%33.9×24.1%n/a

Questions

Who are Meitu's main competitors?
Named competitors: Adobe (ADBE), Kuaishou (1024.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Money Forward (3994.T), Guangdong Aofei Data Technology (300738.SZ), Blackbaud (BLKB), Asana (ASAN), Urban (URBANCO.NS), ePlus (PLUS).
Is Meitu expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.8× against a peer median of 24.7×, 4th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +26%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Meitu stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.3% against +7.0% for the median peer; over one year -48.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.