Loading…

Kuaishou-w1024.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Communication Services›Advertising/Marketing Services

Operates a leading Chinese short-video and livestreaming platform, competing head-to-head with Douyin.

≈ A Chinese TikTok/Twitch hybridMomentum laggard 18
Mkt cap
$16.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
84%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$145M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.7 pp
WACC 11.2%
Hurdle
-23 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
18 days
24 Nov 2026
Close · HKDHK$28.92
1D-1.6%
1W+9.1%
1M-2.6%
3M-34.5%
6M-39.2%
YTD-53.9%
1Y-61.3%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh65.5% off high

What Kuaishou-w does

Operates a leading Chinese short-video and livestreaming platform, competing head-to-head with Douyin.

Advertising placed in the video feeds is now the largest line, ahead of virtual gifts viewers buy during livestreams, where the platform keeps a share and passes the rest to streamers, and commissions on goods sold through livestream shopping. Tencent is among its larger shareholders.

In one line: A Chinese TikTok/Twitch hybrid.

Products and services

  • Short-video app (Kuaishou)
  • Livestreaming/virtual gifting
  • Livestream e-commerce
  • Advertising

Customers

  • Consumers (lower-tier city focus)
  • Advertisers
  • Livestream merchants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication services
  • Social/video platforms
  • Short video, livestreaming & e-commerce

What could go right

  • Livestream e-commerce growth
  • Ad monetization improvement

What could go wrong

  • Intense competition from Douyin
  • Regulatory scrutiny of content/algorithms

Moat: narrow (network effects, scale, data). Large user base and content network effects, though it competes intensely with ByteDance's Douyin.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 2011 · Employees: 24,202

Named competitors

Kuaishou-w at a glance

Size Kuaishou-w (1024.HK) is a Hong Kong Communication Services company (Advertising/Marketing Services) with a market value of $16.0B, the 108th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$28.92 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.2%, against +21.4% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is 10.7% (peer median 11.4%).

Valuation It trades at 14.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.0× (4th most expensive of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +19%, so the hurdle is -23 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.7 points above its cost of capital (11.2% WACC).

Credit Kuaishou-w has 1 bond outstanding ($900M), rated A- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 134 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 24 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1231024.HK 56
Six months, rebased to 100: Kuaishou-w against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Kuaishou-w financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$161BHK$155BHK$138BHK$125BHK$110B
Revenue growth—+13%+10%+14%—
Gross profitHK$85.3BHK$83.9BHK$74.7BHK$63.0BHK$48.5B
EBITDAHK$26.9BHK$27.9BHK$21.9BHK$13.5B-HK$7.12B
Net incomeHK$17.5BHK$20.2BHK$16.6BHK$7.07B-HK$15.9B
Free cash flown/aHK$13.9BHK$24.3BHK$18.0B-HK$2.70B
Capital expendituren/aHK$16.2BHK$8.74BHK$5.41BHK$5.37B
Total debtHK$74.3BHK$38.9BHK$31.4BHK$17.3BHK$14.5B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kuaishou-w competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%0%+10%REAOMCPUB300058DEC4324CBDGWPP1024.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kuaishou-w is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×50×100×REAOMCPUB300058DEC4324WPP1024.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kuaishou-w is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+100%+200%0%100%200%REAOMCPUB300058DEC4324CBDG1024.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kuaishou-w is the large dot.

Kuaishou-w competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1024.HK vs 0700.HK vs 9626.HK vs 9988.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kuaishou-w 1024.HK$16.0B-39%+11%11%14.9×-4.4%
Tencent 0700.HK$482B-11%+16%32%12.5×6.4%
Bilibili 9626.HK$6.06B-36%+11%4%14.2×7.3%
Baba-w 9988.HK$266B-25%+8%4%16.4×n/a
PDD Holdings Inc. Sponsored ADR PDD$117B-16%+14%22%7.5×n/a
Weibo 9898.HK$1.58B-24%+2%25%5.2×n/a

How Kuaishou-w compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kuaishou-w against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1024.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.6%+10.0%2nd lowest of 9
6-month return-39.2%+21.4%lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-65.5%-5.4%lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.3%+4.5%3rd highest of 9
Operating margin10.7%11.4%5th highest of 9
Forward P/E14.9×13.0×4th most expensive of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.4%3.9%4th least demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+18.6%+10.6%2nd highest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-22.9 pp-9.7 pp2nd least demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.7 pp+4.9 pp4th highest of 9
EV / EBITDA4.0×7.1×cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×1.4×least indebted of 7
Bond spread134 bp91 bpwidest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kuaishou-w 1024.HKHong Kong$16.0B-39%+11%11%14.9×-4.4%+18.6%
REA REA.AXAustralia$15.9B+2%+4%48%31.3×19.3%+14.5%
Omnicom OMCUnited States$23.6B+13%+54%15%7.9×-6.9%+5.6%
Publicis Groupe PUB.PAFrance$29.0B+33%+5%15%13.0×1.1%+10.0%
BlueFocus Intelligent Communications 300058.SZChina$6.98B-24%+6%0%123.3×58.3%+11.1%
JCDecaux DEC.PAFrance$6.40B+42%+1%12%18.6×6.6%+11.8%
Dentsu 4324.TJapan$6.37B+30%+4%10%12.8×-12.0%+8.8%
Compagnie du Cambodge CBDG.PAFrance$6.33B-11%+45%-11%n/a55.9%+269.1%
WPP WPP.LUnited Kingdom$5.93B+58%-6%9%7.8×-8.1%+2.5%

Kuaishou-w bonds and credit

Kuaishou-w has 1 bond outstanding with $900M face value. The agencies rate it A-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 6.17%, a spread of 134 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Kuaishou-w's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tencent (0700.HK), Bilibili (9626.HK), Alibaba Group (9988.HK), PDD Holdings (PDD), Weibo (9898.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes REA (REA.AX), Omnicom (OMC), Publicis Groupe (PUB.PA), BlueFocus Intelligent Communications (300058.SZ), JCDecaux (DEC.PA), Dentsu (4324.T).
Is Kuaishou-w expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.9× against a peer median of 13.0×, 4th most expensive of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +19%, so the hurdle is -23 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Kuaishou-w stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.2% against +21.4% for the median peer; over one year -61.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.