Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 090430.KS AmorepacificOpen in the cockpit ↗

Amorepacific090430.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Consumer Staples›Household/Personal Care

South Korea's largest cosmetics maker, selling skincare and makeup brands like Sulwhasoo and Laneige.

≈ Korea's Estée LauderMomentum leader 84
Mkt cap
$6.03B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.1 pp
WACC 5.4%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · KRW₩133,300
1D-0.4%
1W+3.2%
1M-3.8%
3M+1.1%
6M-1.5%
YTD+12.5%
1Y+12.2%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh20.4% off high

What Amorepacific does

South Korea's largest cosmetics maker, selling skincare and makeup brands like Sulwhasoo and Laneige.

Sells through department stores, duty-free shops, its own stores and online, with Laneige now the fastest-growing brand overseas, particularly in the US. China was long its biggest overseas market and demand there has weakened. The Suh family, which founded the group, controls it through a holding company, AmorePacific Group.

In one line: Korea's Estée Lauder.

Products and services

  • Sulwhasoo (luxury skincare)
  • Laneige
  • Innisfree
  • Mamonde

Customers

  • Department stores/duty-free
  • E-commerce/D2C
  • China/SE Asia retail

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer beauty
  • Cosmetics manufacturing & brands
  • Skincare, makeup, haircare

What could go right

  • K-beauty export growth (US, SE Asia)
  • Travel retail recovery

What could go wrong

  • China market volatility
  • Duty-free channel dependence

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Portfolio of well-known K-beauty brands with strong domestic and export distribution.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1945 · Employees: 4,748

Named competitors

Amorepacific at a glance

Size Amorepacific (090430.KS) is a South Korea Consumer Staples company (Household/Personal Care) with a market value of $6.03B, the 69th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩133,300 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.5%, against +12.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.2%); the operating margin is 8.9% (peer median 13.9%).

Valuation It trades at 23.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.9× (10th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.1 points above its cost of capital (5.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 113090430.KS 99
Six months, rebased to 100: Amorepacific against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Amorepacific financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩4.60T₩4.25T₩3.89T₩3.67T₩4.13T
Revenue growth—+9%+6%-11%—
Gross profitn/a₩2.87T₩2.56T₩2.34T₩2.59T
EBITDAn/a₩604B₩478B₩360B₩503B
Net income₩278B₩236B₩593B₩180B₩134B
Free cash flown/a₩519B₩254B₩214B₩51.6B
Capital expendituren/a₩91.3B₩106B₩174B₩135B
Total debtn/a₩350B₩440B₩350B₩357B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Amorepacific competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%-10%0%+10%+20%ELF278470DABURREYN1318CUPIDCOLPALIPAR45274911COTY496710444912CLX8113603605MARICO090430.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Amorepacific is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×ELF278470DABURREYN1318COLPALIPAR4527GODREJCPCOTY496710444912603605MARICO090430.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Amorepacific is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%ELF278470DABURREYN1318COLPALIPAR45274911COTY1044CLX8113603605MARICOPUIG090430.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Amorepacific is the large dot.

Amorepacific competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (090430.KS vs 051900.KS vs EL vs 4911.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Amorepacific 090430.KS$6.03B-1%+10%9%23.8×4.0%
LG H&h 051900.KS$2.56B-8%-3%3%18.5×-0.1%
Estée Lauder Companies (The) EL$39.9B+28%+6%13%31.1×16.8%
Shiseido 4911.T$9.52B+20%+5%4%32.8×17.5%
L'Oreal OR.PA$268B+25%+3%21%32.8×18.1%

How Amorepacific compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Amorepacific against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure090430.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.8%+9.6%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-1.5%+12.5%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-20.4%-10.2%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.1%+6.2%7th highest of 21
Operating margin8.9%13.9%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E23.8×19.9×10th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.0%4.7%10th least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)-0.8%+6.6%2nd lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.8 pp-5.9 pp8th most demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.1 pp+4.8 pp5th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Amorepacific 090430.KSSouth Korea$6.03B-1%+10%9%23.8×4.0%-0.8%
e.l.f. Beauty ELFUnited States$6.85B+91%+31%12%35.4×27.9%+38.8%
APR 278470.KSSouth Korea$7.04B-40%+119%23%17.4×-1.4%+47.3%
Dabur India DABUR.NSIndia$7.13B-19%+9%15%32.1×27.3%+6.6%
Reynolds Consumer Products REYNUnited States$5.08B+10%+2%14%14.6×-0.2%+2.7%
Mao Geping Cosmetics 1318.HKHong Kong$4.92B-28%+32%31%15.0×4.7%+41.1%
Cupid CUPID.NSIndia$4.83B+158%+122%34%n/an/an/a
Colgate-Palmolive (India) COLPAL.NSIndia$4.83B-23%+9%28%32.2×30.8%+4.5%
Interparfums IPARUnited States$4.34B+43%+3%17%29.0×10.9%+22.5%
Rohto Pharmaceutical 4527.TJapan$3.97B+17%+10%12%16.7×-2.1%+13.7%
Godrej Consumer Products GODREJCP.NSIndia$9.19B-18%+12%18%37.0×31.7%+6.6%
Shiseido 4911.TJapan$9.52B+20%+5%4%32.8×17.5%+1.0%
Coty COTYUnited States$3.57B+64%-1%5%13.3×11.3%+4.6%
Kobayashi Pharmaceutical 4967.TJapan$3.29B+20%+4%6%50.2×17.6%+1.9%
Hengan Int'l 1044.HKHong Kong$3.28B-16%+2%11%9.1×-8.8%-0.1%
Lion 4912.TJapan$3.19B+21%+6%8%19.9×-2.4%+3.5%
Clorox CLXUnited States$12.1B+8%+6%14%17.4×2.7%-1.8%
Unicharm 8113.TJapan$12.1B+15%0%12%24.5×-2.0%+5.4%
Proya Cosmetics 603605.SSChina$2.97B-19%+2%13%11.1×-4.8%+23.1%
Marico MARICO.NSIndia$12.3B+8%+20%16%51.8×28.0%+11.1%
Puig Brands PUIG.MCSpain$12.5B+16%+4%16%17.9×-3.0%+11.7%

Questions

Who are Amorepacific's main competitors?
Named competitors: LG Household & Health Care (051900.KS), Estée Lauder (EL), Shiseido (4911.T), L'Oréal (OR.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes e.l.f. Beauty (ELF), APR (278470.KS), Dabur India (DABUR.NS), Reynolds Consumer Products (REYN), Mao Geping Cosmetics (1318.HK), Cupid (CUPID.NS).
Is Amorepacific expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.8× against a peer median of 19.9×, 10th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Amorepacific stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.5% against +12.5% for the median peer; over one year +12.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.