Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › IPAR Interparfums, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Interparfums, Inc.IPARCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Staples›Household/Personal Care

Designs, markets and distributes prestige fragrances under licensed brands such as Coach, GUESS, Jimmy Choo and Montblanc.

Momentum leader 92
Mkt cap
$4.34B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
56%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$29.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
29.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.2 pp
WACC 10.1%
Hurdle
-12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · USD$135.55
1D+0.2%
1W+16.5%
1M+21.5%
3M+13.4%
6M+43.5%
YTD+59.8%
1Y+48.5%
ATR %3.1%
Beta0.11
52w lowhigh0.7% off high

What Interparfums does

Designs, markets and distributes prestige fragrances under licensed brands such as Coach, GUESS, Jimmy Choo and Montblanc.

Holds licences for fashion brands rather than owning them: it pays the brand owner a royalty on sales and handles design, outsourced production and distribution, which makes renewal of each licence critical. It operates through a Paris-based arm, separately listed and majority-owned, and a US arm.

Products and services

  • Licensed fragrance brands
  • Own brands (e.g., Lanvin)

Customers

  • Department stores
  • Specialty beauty retailers
  • Duty-free/travel retail

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer/beauty
  • Prestige fragrance licensing and…
  • Brand marketing and global distribution

What could go right

  • License renewals and new brand additions
  • Travel retail/duty-free growth

What could go wrong

  • License non-renewal risk
  • Fashion brand desirability shifts

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, IP / patents). Long-term fragrance licenses with global fashion brands and established retail distribution are hard to replicate quickly.

Headquarters: New York, New York, United States · Founded: 1982 · Employees: 662

Named competitors

Interparfums at a glance

Size Interparfums (IPAR) is a United States Consumer Staples company (Household/Personal Care) with a market value of $4.34B, the 1294th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $135.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 43.5%, against -5.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 17.3% (peer median 13.2%).

Valuation It trades at 29.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.5× (6th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +23%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.2 points above its cost of capital (10.1% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 6.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026IPAR 150Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Interparfums against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Interparfums financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.50B$1.49B$1.45B$1.32B$1.09B
Revenue growth—+2%+10%+21%—
Gross profit$958M$947M$927M$839M$694M
EBITDA$284M$296M$303M$269M$222M
Net income$168M$168M$164M$153M$121M
Free cash flow$246M$190M$183M$99.3M$81.4M
Capital expenditure$12.8M$48.2M$22.4M$53.4M$133M
Total debt$165M$208M$192M$192M$210M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Interparfums competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%4527COLPALCUPID1318REYNCOTY4967104449120904306036052367ELF300888278470DABUR051900PGHH2698IPAR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Interparfums is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×4527COLPAL1318REYNCOTY496710444912090430603605ELF278470DABUR2698IPARRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Interparfums is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%4527COLPAL1318REYNCOTY496710440904306036052367ELF300888278470DABURGILLETTE051900PGHH2698IPARGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Interparfums is the large dot.

Interparfums competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (IPAR vs COTY vs PUIG.MC vs ITP.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Interparfums IPAR$4.34B+43%+3%17%29.0×10.9%
Coty COTY$3.57B+64%-1%5%13.3×11.3%
Puig Brands PUIG.MC$12.5B+16%+4%16%17.9×-3.0%
Interparfums ITP.PA$3.65B+72%-4%18%27.5×15.9%

How Interparfums compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Interparfums against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIPARPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+21.5%+0.2%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+43.5%-5.7%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-0.7%-24.1%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.9%+7.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin17.3%13.2%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E29.0×18.5×6th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)10.9%4.0%8th most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+22.5%+6.6%6th highest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.6 pp-2.8 pp7th least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.2 pp+4.8 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA15.9×14.5×8th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×-0.8×4th most indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Interparfums IPARUnited States$4.34B+43%+3%17%29.0×10.9%+22.5%
Rohto Pharmaceutical 4527.TJapan$3.97B+17%+10%12%16.7×-2.1%+13.7%
Colgate-Palmolive (India) COLPAL.NSIndia$4.83B-23%+9%28%32.2×30.8%+4.5%
Cupid CUPID.NSIndia$4.83B+158%+122%34%n/an/an/a
Mao Geping Cosmetics 1318.HKHong Kong$4.92B-28%+32%31%15.0×4.7%+41.1%
Reynolds Consumer Products REYNUnited States$5.08B+10%+2%14%14.6×-0.2%+2.7%
Coty COTYUnited States$3.57B+64%-1%5%13.3×11.3%+4.6%
Kobayashi Pharmaceutical 4967.TJapan$3.29B+20%+4%6%50.2×17.6%+1.9%
Hengan Int'l 1044.HKHong Kong$3.28B-16%+2%11%9.1×-8.8%-0.1%
Lion 4912.TJapan$3.19B+21%+6%8%19.9×-2.4%+3.5%
Amorepacific 090430.KSSouth Korea$6.03B-1%+10%9%23.8×4.0%-0.8%
Proya Cosmetics 603605.SSChina$2.97B-19%+2%13%11.1×-4.8%+23.1%
Giant Biogene 2367.HKHong Kong$2.76B-34%-10%32%9.7×-8.0%+34.9%
e.l.f. Beauty ELFUnited States$6.85B+91%+31%12%35.4×27.9%+38.8%
Winner Medical 300888.SZChina$2.69B-2%+4%11%20.9×-4.3%-2.6%
APR 278470.KSSouth Korea$7.04B-40%+119%23%17.4×-1.4%+47.3%
Dabur India DABUR.NSIndia$7.13B-19%+9%15%32.1×27.3%+6.6%
Gillette India GILLETTE.NSIndia$2.56B-7%+8%28%33.0×16.0%+13.0%
LG H&h 051900.KSSouth Korea$2.56B-8%-3%3%18.5×-0.1%-4.1%
Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Health Care PGHH.NSIndia$2.40B-29%-2%24%27.3×15.4%+7.4%
Softcare 2698.HKHong Kong$2.20B-5%+25%25%14.4×8.7%+20.9%

Questions

Who are Interparfums's main competitors?
Named competitors: Coty (COTY), Puig (PUIG.MC), Inter Parfums SA (majority owner) (ITP.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Rohto Pharmaceutical (4527.T), Colgate-Palmolive (India) (COLPAL.NS), Cupid (CUPID.NS), Mao Geping Cosmetics (1318.HK), Reynolds Consumer Products (REYN), Coty (COTY).
Is Interparfums expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 29.0× against a peer median of 18.5×, 6th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +23%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Interparfums stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +43.5% against -5.7% for the median peer; over one year +48.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.