Loading…

NC036570.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Communication Services›Packaged Software

Korean video-game developer/publisher known for MMORPG franchises like Lineage, sold mainly in Korea and Asia.

≈ Korea's Blizzard Entertainment — an MMORPG-focused studio.Momentum strong 60
Mkt cap
$2.98B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.6 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
+4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩208,500
1D-0.5%
1W+3.5%
1M-12.2%
3M-13.3%
6M-22.9%
YTD+4.0%
1Y-1.6%
ATR %4.8%
52w lowhigh39.3% off high

What NC does

Korean video-game developer/publisher known for MMORPG franchises like Lineage, sold mainly in Korea and Asia.

Earns mainly from players buying in-game items in the free-to-play Lineage titles, mostly on mobile in Korea, with a small group of high-spending players contributing much of it. Founder Kim Taek-jin remains the largest shareholder.

In one line: Korea's Blizzard Entertainment — an MMORPG-focused studio..

Products and services

  • Lineage series (PC/mobile MMORPG)
  • Other MMORPG/RPG titles
  • New IP/genre diversification titles

Customers

  • Korean/Asian MMORPG players

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Video games
  • Game development & publishing
  • Lineage MMORPG franchise (PC/mobile)…

What could go right

  • Successful new IP launches diversifying beyond Lineage
  • Cost restructuring

What could go wrong

  • Aging Lineage franchise revenue decline
  • New-title execution risk

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base, network effects). Long-running Lineage IP with a loyal, high-spending player base, but revenue has been declining as the franchise ages.

Headquarters: Seongnam, South Korea · Founded: 1997 · Employees: 3,262

Named competitors

NC at a glance

Size NC (036570.KS) is a South Korea Communication Services company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $2.98B, the 100th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩208,500 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 22.9%, against -9.9% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 34.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.0%); the operating margin is 13.5% (peer median 19.6%).

Valuation It trades at 9.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (3rd cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -9%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points above its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 91036570.KS 78
Six months, rebased to 100: NC against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

NC financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩2.09T₩1.51T₩1.58T₩1.78T₩2.57T
Revenue growth—-5%-11%-31%—
Gross profit₩882B₩598B₩517B₩801B₩1.98T
EBITDA₩379B₩104B₩1.36B₩254B₩665B
Net income₩618B₩347B₩94.2B₩212B₩436B
Free cash flow₩213B₩58.5B₩22.9B₩22.5B₩486B
Capital expenditure₩168B₩115B₩95.4B₩159B₩253B
Total debt₩366B₩357B₩379B₩642B₩621B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

NC competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%251270TTD2599601920800354209766ROKURBLXTTWO9999036570.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. NC is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+20%+40%0×50×100×251270TTD2599601920800354209766ROKUTTWO0700036570.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. NC is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%251270TTD2599600354209766ROKURBLXTTWO99990700036570.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. NC is the large dot.

NC competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (036570.KS vs 259960.KS vs 251270.KS vs 3659.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
NC 036570.KS$2.98B-23%+35%14%9.3×-4.8%
Krafton 259960.KS$6.94B-17%+55%30%12.4×-18.5%
Netmarble 251270.KS$2.02B-30%+10%11%5.7×-8.0%
Nexon 3659.T$13.8B+10%+15%26%22.4×-9.1%
Tencent 0700.HK$482B-11%+16%32%12.5×6.4%

How NC compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

NC against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure036570.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%+4.4%lowest of 12
6-month return-22.9%-9.9%3rd lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-39.3%-28.1%4th lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+34.6%+16.0%2nd highest of 12
Operating margin13.5%19.6%5th lowest of 12
Forward P/E9.3×14.8×3rd cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.8%-1.0%4th least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)-9.0%+14.7%lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.2 pp-12.8 pp3rd most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.6 pp+8.1 pp4th lowest of 10
EV / EBITDA7.0×8.7×4th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-4.0×-1.4×least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
NC 036570.KSSouth Korea$2.98B-23%+35%14%9.3×-4.8%-9.0%
Netmarble 251270.KSSouth Korea$2.02B-30%+10%11%5.7×-8.0%+2.7%
Trade Desk (The) TTDUnited States$6.11B-44%+12%20%121.4×-5.8%+28.2%
Krafton 259960.KSSouth Korea$6.94B-17%+55%30%12.4×-18.5%+14.8%
DoubleUGames 192080.KSSouth Korea$795M-10%+25%33%5.7×n/an/a
Naver 035420.KSSouth Korea$20.3B-10%+15%17%15.5×-0.6%+17.8%
Konami 9766.TJapan$23.5B+45%+25%33%25.7×-1.5%+12.6%
Roku ROKUUnited States$23.9B+24%+21%8%39.1×39.6%+21.6%
Roblox RBLXUnited States$35.3B+18%+32%-20%n/a15.7%+39.6%
Take-Two Interactive TTWOUnited States$40.2B-3%+15%-1%26.7×44.7%+14.6%
NTES 9999.HKHong Kong$81.4B+8%+10%35%14.0×-3.5%+8.1%
Tencent 0700.HKHong Kong$482B-11%+16%32%12.5×6.4%+8.5%

Questions

Who are NC's main competitors?
Named competitors: Krafton (259960.KS), Netmarble (251270.KS), Nexon (3659.T), Tencent Holdings (games) (0700.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Netmarble (251270.KS), Trade Desk (The) (TTD), Krafton (259960.KS), DoubleUGames (192080.KS), Naver (035420.KS), Konami (9766.T).
Is NC expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.3× against a peer median of 14.8×, 3rd cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -9%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has NC stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -22.9% against -9.9% for the median peer; over one year -1.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.