Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › THULE.ST Thule Group ABOpen in the cockpit ↗

Thule Group ABTHULE.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles

Swedish maker of outdoor and sports transport products, including roof boxes, bike racks and luggage, sold under the Thule brand.

≈ A premium outdoor-gear brand like a smaller Yeti HoldingsMomentum neutral 52
Mkt cap
$2.39B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.96M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.4 pp
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · SEKSEK 216.80
1D-1.4%
1W+11.1%
1M+16.6%
3M+1.5%
6M-5.7%
YTD-9.6%
1Y-10.6%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh15.3% off high

What Thule does

Swedish maker of outdoor and sports transport products, including roof boxes, bike racks and luggage, sold under the Thule brand.

Sells through sports and outdoor retailers, bike shops and car dealers, with fit-to-vehicle racks and boxes bought as add-ons to cars people already own, so car ownership as much as outdoor trends fuels demand.

In one line: A premium outdoor-gear brand like a smaller Yeti Holdings.

Products and services

  • Roof boxes/racks
  • Bike carriers
  • Luggage/backpacks
  • Child carriers/strollers

Customers

  • Outdoor/active-lifestyle consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Outdoor/sports equipment
  • Roof racks, carriers and outdoor gear…

What could go right

  • Outdoor recreation/active lifestyle demand growth
  • Emerging-market brand expansion

What could go wrong

  • Discretionary consumer spending sensitivity
  • Raw material (aluminum, plastics) cost swings

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, installed base). Premium brand loyalty and dealer/OEM (car roof-rail) relationships support pricing power in a discretionary category.

Headquarters: Malmo, Sweden · Founded: 1942 · Employees: 2,880

Named competitors

Thule at a glance

Size Thule (THULE.ST) is a Sweden Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $2.39B, the 70th largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 216.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.7%, against -14.8% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.2%); the operating margin is 17.1% (peer median 3.5%).

Valuation It trades at 18.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.9× (4th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.4 points above its cost of capital (9.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026THULE.ST 92Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Thule against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Thule financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 10.4BSEK 10.4BSEK 9.54BSEK 9.13BSEK 10.1B
Revenue growth—+9%+4%-10%—
Gross profitSEK 4.88BSEK 4.76BSEK 4.07BSEK 3.73BSEK 3.85B
EBITDASEK 2.15BSEK 2.04BSEK 1.80BSEK 1.76BSEK 1.91B
Net incomeSEK 1.24BSEK 1.11BSEK 1.12BSEK 1.10BSEK 1.27B
Free cash flowSEK 1.30BSEK 784MSEK 2.05BSEK 1.60BSEK 173M
Capital expenditureSEK 400MSEK 348MSEK 264MSEK 251MSEK 444M
Total debtSEK 4.44BSEK 4.27BSEK 4.38BSEK 2.17BSEK 3.09B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Thule competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-10%0%+10%000927FORCEMOT603529600166TRI301345BLBDOLAELEC72110005501585HOG0425000951300201VOLCAR-B6000062206600733000800THULE.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Thule is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×30×603529600166TRI301345BLBD72110005501585HOG0425000951300201000800THULE.STRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Thule is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%000927FORCEMOT600166TRI301345BLBD1585HOG04250009513002012206THULE.STGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Thule is the large dot.

Thule competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (THULE.ST vs YETI vs 1910.HK vs VFC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Thule THULE.ST$2.39B-6%+2%17%18.3×9.3%
YETI YETI$3.28B+8%+6%12%14.2×11.5%
Samsonite 1910.HK$2.52B-6%+1%15%10.3×-12.2%
V.F VFC$8.01B+7%-2%8%16.6×11.1%

How Thule compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Thule against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTHULE.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+16.6%-2.3%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-5.7%-14.8%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-15.3%-32.2%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.6%+10.2%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin17.1%3.5%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E18.3×11.9×4th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.3%1.7%3rd most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.9%+9.9%6th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.3 pp-7.5 pp3rd most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.4 pp+0.2 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA12.5×6.1×3rd most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×0.2×2nd most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Thule THULE.STSweden$2.39B-6%+2%17%18.3×9.3%+5.9%
China Railway Materials 000927.SZChina$2.20B-14%+1%2%n/a6.3%-5.0%
Force Motors FORCEMOT.NSIndia$2.64B-8%+16%12%n/a25.2%+35.4%
Aima Technology 603529.SSChina$2.67B-11%-11%5%12.7×n/an/a
Beiqi Foton Motor 600166.SSChina$2.88B-31%+13%1%10.1×-1.2%+1.3%
Trigano TRI.PAFrance$2.93B-16%+2%9%9.4×-6.0%+10.9%
Zhejiang Taotao Vehicles 301345.SZChina$1.91B-54%+53%25%11.9×2.2%+23.3%
Blue Bird BLBDUnited States$1.82B-18%+13%12%12.8×3.7%+11.0%
Ola Electric Mobility OLAELEC.NSIndia$1.81B-3%-49%-83%n/an/an/a
Mitsubishi Motor 7211.TJapan$3.21B+13%+5%3%17.9×n/an/a
Jiangling Motors 000550.SZChina$1.70B-12%+7%1%11.9×n/an/a
Yadea 1585.HKHong Kong$3.36B-28%+13%7%8.9×-11.2%+13.0%
Harley-Davidson HOGUnited States$3.40B+28%-15%-4%18.6×0.4%+2.0%
Minth 0425.HKHong Kong$3.45B-37%+14%11%7.5×2.7%+14.8%
Sinotruk Jinan Truck 000951.SZChina$3.46B-10%+36%4%11.2×-5.8%-0.8%
Xuzhou Handler Special Vehicle 300201.SZChina$1.64B-9%+18%22%22.5×22.0%-3.3%
Volvo Car VOLCAR-B.STSweden$3.63B-45%-17%0%n/an/an/a
Dongfeng Automobile 600006.SSChina$1.53B-24%-5%-13%n/an/an/a
Sanyang Motor 2206.TWTaiwan$1.43B+8%-3%8%n/a1.2%+9.0%
BAIC BluePark New Energy Technology 600733.SSChina$4.02B-41%+54%-19%n/an/an/a
FAW Jiefang 000800.SZChina$4.11B-17%+22%-1%29.5×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Thule's main competitors?
Named competitors: Yakima Products (private) (private or unlisted), Yeti Holdings (YETI), Rhino-Rack (private) (private or unlisted), Samsonite (1910.HK), VF Corporation (VFC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Railway Materials (000927.SZ), Force Motors (FORCEMOT.NS), Aima Technology (603529.SS), Beiqi Foton Motor (600166.SS), Trigano (TRI.PA), Zhejiang Taotao Vehicles (301345.SZ).
Is Thule expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.3× against a peer median of 11.9×, 4th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Thule stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.7% against -14.8% for the median peer; over one year -10.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.