Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6098.T Recruit Holdings Co LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Recruit Holdings Co Ltd6098.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Communication Services›Internet Software/Services

Runs HR-tech job platforms (Indeed, Glassdoor) plus Japanese staffing and lifestyle-services marketplaces.

≈ Parent of Indeed/Glassdoor, itself the category leaderMomentum leader 99
Mkt cap
$149B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
90%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$579M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+37.5 pp
WACC 9.8%
Hurdle
+12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥17,000
1D-5.6%
1W-10.0%
1M+0.1%
3M+37.3%
6M+132.8%
YTD+92.5%
1Y+116.4%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh13.1% off high

What Recruit does

Runs HR-tech job platforms (Indeed, Glassdoor) plus Japanese staffing and lifestyle-services marketplaces.

Earns on Indeed mainly when employers pay for sponsored job listings, typically per click or application, so revenue follows job postings and hiring demand. The Japanese staffing arm earns fees on placing workers, and its consumer marketplaces take listing fees and commissions. Indeed was bought in 2012 and Glassdoor in 2018.

In one line: Parent of Indeed/Glassdoor, itself the category leader.

Products and services

  • HR technology (Indeed, Glassdoor)
  • Staffing (temp/placement)
  • Matching & solutions (Japan classifieds: housing, travel, di

Customers

  • Job seekers and employers worldwide
  • Temp/placement staffing clients
  • Japanese consumers (dining/travel/beauty bookings)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • HR services/internet
  • Job search + staffing + marketplaces
  • Indeed/Glassdoor, staffing, Japan…

What could go right

  • Global online hiring growth
  • Cross-sell within HR-tech and staffing

What could go wrong

  • Hiring-market cyclicality (layoffs cut job postings)

Moat: wide (network effects, brand, scale). Indeed is the world's most-visited job site; its two-sided scale is very hard for rivals to replicate.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1960 · Employees: 45,586

Named competitors

Recruit at a glance

Size Recruit (6098.T) is a Japan Communication Services company (Internet Software/Services) with a market value of $149B, the 5th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥17,000 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 132.8%, against -3.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.4%); the operating margin is 19.9% (peer median 21.5%).

Valuation It trades at 30.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.4× (3rd most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 37.5 points above its cost of capital (9.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020025011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266098.T 231Peer median 96
Six months, rebased to 100: Recruit against the median of its 18 peers (local-currency closes).

Recruit financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥3.86T¥3.70T¥3.56T¥3.42T¥3.43T
Revenue growth—+4%+4%0%—
Gross profit¥2.28T¥2.09T¥1.98T¥1.85T¥1.88T
EBITDA¥876B¥768B¥636B¥561B¥516B
Net income¥579B¥497B¥409B¥354B¥270B
Free cash flow¥741B¥659B¥602B¥524B¥416B
Capital expenditure¥60.4B¥62.3B¥65.3B¥69.9B¥76.8B
Total debt¥179B¥186B¥209B¥221B¥255B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Recruit competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-40%-20%0%+20%SPOTNFLXFWONA9888RDDTMETA16983659PINSMTCHGOOGL4751CARG25189899RUM6098.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Recruit is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%20×40×SPOTNFLXFWONA9888RDDTMETA16983659PINSMTCH4751013625189899GRND6098.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Recruit is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%75%SPOTNFLXFWONARDDTMETA16983659MTCHGOOGL4751CARG013625189899GRND6098.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Recruit is the large dot.

Recruit competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6098.T vs MSFT vs ZIP vs RAND.AS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Recruit 6098.T$149B+133%+9%20%30.3×22.0%
Microsoft MSFT$3.94T+28%+18%47%25.5×17.2%
ZipRecruiter ZIP$309M+4%0%0%n/a45.4%
Randstad RAND.AS$8.14B+69%0%3%15.5×1.1%
Adecco ADEN.SW$4.82B+24%0%2%10.3×-3.5%
ManpowerGroup MAN$2.07B+49%+7%2%10.3×-0.4%

How Recruit compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Recruit against its 18 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6098.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.1%-6.6%9th highest of 19
6-month return+132.8%-3.8%highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-13.1%-31.2%3rd highest of 19
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.3%+14.4%7th lowest of 19
Operating margin19.9%21.5%10th highest of 19
Forward P/E30.3×15.4×3rd most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.0%7.9%3rd most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.3%+14.7%6th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+11.7 pp-6.9 pp2nd most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+37.5 pp+10.3 pp3rd highest of 17
EV / EBITDA26.1×11.9×4th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-0.8×-1.2×8th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Recruit 6098.TJapan$149B+133%+9%20%30.3×22.0%+10.3%
Spotify Technology SPOTUnited States$124B+44%+17%15%37.4×29.4%+16.6%
Netflix NFLXUnited States$260B-28%+15%32%17.7×15.0%+12.6%
Liberty Media FWONAUnited States$27.3B+18%+12%12%51.0×29.0%+31.4%
Bidu-sw 9888.HKHong Kong$26.4B-43%-1%7%14.5×n/an/a
Reddit RDDTUnited States$18.4B-39%+62%29%15.0×18.0%+57.3%
Meta Platforms METAUnited States$1.56T0%+28%33%19.0×16.6%+18.5%
Tencent Music Entertainment 1698.HKHong Kong$13.9B-2%+16%29%11.0×0.6%+1.7%
Nexon 3659.TJapan$13.8B+10%+15%26%22.4×-9.1%+10.1%
Pinterest PINSUnited States$10.9B-11%+15%6%8.8×16.2%+20.1%
Match MTCHUnited States$8.88B+6%0%30%13.6×1.8%+7.8%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) GOOGLUnited States$3.47T-29%+22%33%20.5×18.5%+17.2%
Cyber Agent 4751.TJapan$4.13B+3%+14%10%15.4×-11.3%+12.8%
CarGurus CARGUnited States$3.01B-3%+6%26%12.1×2.7%+10.5%
China Ruyi 0136.HKHong Kong$2.82B-5%-40%-17%12.6×13.1%+69.6%
Autohome 2518.HKHong Kong$2.70B+21%-22%0%22.7×-15.3%-6.4%
NetEase Cloud Music 9899.HKHong Kong$2.52B-21%+6%17%10.1×-18.7%+8.9%
RUM RUMUnited States$2.44B-41%+13%-101%n/an/an/a
Grindr GRNDUnited States$2.35B-10%+32%31%19.7×-6.0%+31.1%

Questions

Who are Recruit's main competitors?
Named competitors: LinkedIn (Microsoft) (MSFT), ZipRecruiter (ZIP), Randstad (RAND.AS), Adecco (ADEN.SW), ManpowerGroup (MAN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Spotify Technology (SPOT), Netflix (NFLX), Liberty Media (FWONA), Bidu-sw (9888.HK), Reddit (RDDT), Meta Platforms (META).
Is Recruit expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.3× against a peer median of 15.4×, 3rd most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Recruit stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +132.8% against -3.8% for the median peer; over one year +116.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.