Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9899.HK NetEase Cloud Music Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

NetEase Cloud Music Inc.9899.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Communication Services›Internet Software/Services

China's second-largest online music streaming platform, known for algorithmic recommendations and a strong indie/user-generated content community.

≈ China's Spotify (community/indie-focused)Momentum neutral 51
Mkt cap
$2.52B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
39%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.47M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 11.0%
Hurdle
-28 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · HKDHK$97.40
1D-1.4%
1W+8.8%
1M+18.6%
3M-22.0%
6M-21.3%
YTD-47.6%
1Y-61.4%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh62.1% off high

What NetEase Cloud Music does

China's second-largest online music streaming platform, known for algorithmic recommendations and a strong indie/user-generated content community.

Earns from paid memberships and from social-entertainment services, such as live-streamed audio rooms where users buy virtual gifts, and pays licence fees to record labels for its catalogue. NetEase, the gaming and internet group, remains its controlling shareholder after the 2021 Hong Kong listing.

In one line: China's Spotify (community/indie-focused).

Products and services

  • Music streaming
  • Social/community features (comments, playlists)
  • Live streaming/audio entertainment

Customers

  • Consumers (subscribers & freemium users)
  • Independent musicians/labels

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication services / media
  • Music streaming platform
  • Music streaming, social/community…

What could go right

  • Subscriber/paying-ratio growth

What could go wrong

  • Music licensing costs and catalog gaps versus Tencent Music
  • Thin profitability history

Moat: none (brand, network effects). Strong community/brand loyalty but a distant #2 in licensed catalog scale versus Tencent Music.

Headquarters: Hangzhou, China · Founded: 2013 · Employees: 1,288

Named competitors

NetEase Cloud Music at a glance

Size NetEase Cloud Music (9899.HK) is a Hong Kong Communication Services company (Internet Software/Services) with a market value of $2.52B, the 378th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$97.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.3%, against -2.9% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.0%); the operating margin is 17.4% (peer median 9.5%).

Valuation It trades at 10.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.5× (cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1039899.HK 78
Six months, rebased to 100: NetEase Cloud Music against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

NetEase Cloud Music financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$8.82BHK$8.42BHK$8.62BHK$8.69BHK$10.5B
Revenue growth—-2%-1%-17%—
Gross profitHK$3.19BHK$2.99BHK$2.89BHK$2.31BHK$1.48B
EBITDAHK$1.55BHK$1.56BHK$1.22BHK$365M-HK$580M
Net incomeHK$1.87BHK$2.98BHK$1.69BHK$811M-HK$258M
Free cash flowHK$2.15BHK$2.24BHK$2.20BHK$678MHK$2.29B
Capital expenditureHK$7.01MHK$12.1MHK$4.02MHK$6.13MHK$30.3M
Total debtn/aHK$6.90MHK$6.89MHK$7.00MHK$9.43M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

NetEase Cloud Music competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%RUM2518GRND0136CARG4751MTCH9899.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. NetEase Cloud Music is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%10×15×20×2518GRND0136CARG4751MTCH9899.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. NetEase Cloud Music is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%75%2518GRND0136CARG4751MTCH9899.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. NetEase Cloud Music is the large dot.

NetEase Cloud Music competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9899.HK vs 1698.HK vs SPOT vs NTES)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
NetEase Cloud Music 9899.HK$2.52B-21%+6%17%10.1×-18.7%
Tencent Music Entertainment 1698.HK$13.9B-2%+16%29%11.0×0.6%
Spotify Technology SPOT$124B+44%+17%15%37.4×29.4%
Netease Inc Sponsored ADR NTES$74.3B+12%+10%35%13.1×-4.5%

How NetEase Cloud Music compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

NetEase Cloud Music against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9899.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+18.6%-6.0%highest of 8
6-month return-21.3%-2.9%2nd lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-62.1%-25.8%lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.0%+6.0%4th lowest of 8
Operating margin17.4%9.5%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E10.1×14.5×cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-18.7%-2.1%least demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.9%+11.6%3rd lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-27.6 pp-16.5 pp3rd least demanding of 7
EV / EBITDA3.0×10.3×cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-9.8×-0.5×2nd least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
NetEase Cloud Music 9899.HKHong Kong$2.52B-21%+6%17%10.1×-18.7%+8.9%
RUM RUMUnited States$2.44B-41%+13%-101%n/an/an/a
Autohome 2518.HKHong Kong$2.70B+21%-22%0%22.7×-15.3%-6.4%
Grindr GRNDUnited States$2.35B-10%+32%31%19.7×-6.0%+31.1%
China Ruyi 0136.HKHong Kong$2.82B-5%-40%-17%12.6×13.1%+69.6%
CarGurus CARGUnited States$3.01B-3%+6%26%12.1×2.7%+10.5%
Cyber Agent 4751.TJapan$4.13B+3%+14%10%15.4×-11.3%+12.8%
Match MTCHUnited States$8.88B+6%0%30%13.6×1.8%+7.8%

Questions

Who are NetEase Cloud Music's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tencent Music Entertainment (1698.HK), Spotify Technology (SPOT), NetEase, Inc. (parent) (NTES). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes RUM (RUM), Autohome (2518.HK), Grindr (GRND), China Ruyi (0136.HK), CarGurus (CARG), Cyber Agent (4751.T).
Is NetEase Cloud Music expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.1× against a peer median of 14.5×, cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has NetEase Cloud Music stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.3% against -2.9% for the median peer; over one year -61.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.