Loading…

Zip Co Ltd.ZIP.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Financials›Finance/Rental/Leasing

Buy-now-pay-later fintech letting consumers split purchases into installments, operating mainly in Australia and the US.

≈ Australia's Affirm/Afterpay-style BNPL providerMomentum weak 21
Mkt cap
$1.74B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$37.4M
20-day average traded
P/B
3.74×
price to book
ROE
16.8%
delivered
Implied ROE
66.6%
what the price asks
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$2.02
1D-5.6%
1W+12.8%
1M-2.9%
3M-26.3%
6M-17.2%
YTD-38.6%
1Y-42.6%
ATR %8.8%
52w lowhigh47.0% off high

What Zip does

Buy-now-pay-later fintech letting consumers split purchases into installments, operating mainly in Australia and the US.

Is paid mainly by merchants, who pay a fee on each purchase to offer instalments, with smaller income from customer fees and interest. It funds customer loans through borrowings secured on them, so funding costs and credit losses are the key swing factors. The US has grown to be its bigger market.

In one line: Australia's Affirm/Afterpay-style BNPL provider.

Products and services

  • Buy-now-pay-later (retail)
  • Zip Business (SME finance)

Customers

  • Retail consumers
  • E-commerce/retail merchants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Merchant partnerships
  • BNPL lending platform
  • Consumer repayment collection

What could go right

  • BNPL adoption growth in US
  • Merchant network expansion

What could go wrong

  • Consumer credit losses/bad debt
  • Regulatory scrutiny of BNPL

Moat: narrow (network effects, data). Merchant and consumer network scale plus proprietary credit-risk data, though BNPL competition is intense.

Headquarters: Sydney, Australia · Founded: 2013 · Employees: 877

Named competitors

Zip at a glance

Size Zip (ZIP.AX) is an Australia Financials company (Finance/Rental/Leasing) with a market value of $1.74B, the 132nd largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$2.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.2%, against -3.9% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 10.9% (peer median 12.6%).

Valuation It trades at 3.74× book value against a peer median of 1.54× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 66.6%; Zip delivers 16.8%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95ZIP.AX 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Zip against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Zip financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$1.35BA$1.35BA$1.10BA$874MA$672M
Revenue growth—+23%+25%+30%—
Gross profitA$880MA$881MA$623MA$451MA$326M
EBITDAA$195MA$195MA$91.6M-A$8.99M-A$160M
Net incomeA$116MA$116MA$79.9MA$11.2M-A$384M
Free cash flow-A$87.2M-A$87.2M-A$51.4MA$272M-A$228M
Capital expenditureA$42.9MA$42.9MA$19.5MA$17.5MA$24.6M
Total debtn/aA$2.76BA$2.42BA$2.42BA$2.94B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Zip competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%+20%+40%IFCIEZPWCREDITACCMTROSAMMAANCAPAGM089860AADHARHFCPRGCTOSUPBDZIGUPST4665ATLC1905603300WDZIP.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Zip is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-10%0%10%20%10×20×30×IFCIEZPW002031CREDITACCMTROSAMMAANCAPAGM0898608570AADHARHFCPRGCTOSUPST4665ATLC1905WDZIP.AXReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Zip is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%20%40%60%0%25%50%EZPW002031CREDITACCMTROAGM0898608570PRGCTOSUPSTATLCZIP.AXROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Zip is the large dot.

Zip competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ZIP.AX vs XYZ vs AFRM vs KLAR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Zip ZIP.AX$1.74B-17%+24%17%3.74×66.6%
Block XYZ$51.7B+14%+7%2%2.26×36.3%
Affirm AFRM$23.1B+6%+32%45%4.19×73.6%
Klarna KLAR$5.13B-6%+34%-6%2.11×24.0%

How Zip compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Zip against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureZIP.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.9%-0.5%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-17.2%-3.9%5th lowest of 21
Return on equity16.8%6.9%4th highest of 21
Price / book3.74×1.54×2nd most expensive of 21
Trailing P/E22.3×15.6×7th most expensive of 19
ROE the price implies66.6%14.1%most demanding of 21
ROE delivered16.8%7.1%4th highest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Zip ZIP.AXAustralia$1.74B-17%+24%17%3.74×66.6%16.8%
IFCI IFCI.NSIndia$1.75B-4%-3%2%1.85×36.2%n/a
EZCORP EZPWUnited States$1.75B-15%+29%15%1.51×11.5%14.7%
Greatoo Intelligent Equipment 002031.SZChina$1.68B-11%-20%-13%6.07×54.9%-13.5%
CreditAccess Grameen CREDITACC.NSIndia$1.84B-27%+17%20%1.95×20.5%19.7%
Metro Bank MTRO.LUnited Kingdom$1.63B+22%+1%4%0.94×12.1%4.3%
Sammaan Capital SAMMAANCAP.NSIndia$1.61B-13%-60%-35%0.80×14.2%n/a
Federal Agricultural Mortgage AGMUnited States$1.90B0%+31%13%1.56×14.0%13.5%
LOTTE rental 089860.KSSouth Korea$1.56B+74%+4%8%1.34×6.3%7.7%
AEON Financial Service 8570.TJapan$1.95B-9%+8%5%0.67×5.2%4.9%
Aadhar Housing Finance AADHARHFC.NSIndia$1.99B-14%+18%16%2.48×31.1%n/a
PROG PRGUnited States$1.47B+4%+10%17%1.82×23.0%17.3%
Custom Truck One Source CTOSUnited States$2.12B-4%+6%4%2.58×26.7%3.7%
Upbound UPBDUnited States$1.41B+29%+3%16%1.88×23.5%15.5%
Zigup ZIG.LUnited Kingdom$1.41B+14%+3%7%0.96×12.8%7.1%
Upstart UPSTUnited States$2.17B-24%+39%8%2.44×37.8%8.0%
Duskin 4665.TJapan$1.40B+20%+3%7%1.43×5.4%6.7%
Atlanticus ATLCUnited States$1.38B+8%+84%23%1.97×24.5%22.9%
Haitong Unitrust International Financial Leasing 1905.HKHong Kong$1.38B+57%-20%6%0.52×4.2%6.5%
Zhejiang Haikong Nanke Huatie Digital Technology 603300.SSChina$1.34B-31%+12%5%1.29×9.8%5.3%
Walker & Dunlop WDUnited States$1.34B-28%+9%2%0.76×10.0%2.2%

Questions

Who are Zip's main competitors?
Named competitors: Block (Afterpay) (XYZ), Affirm Holdings (AFRM), Klarna (KLAR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes IFCI (IFCI.NS), EZCORP (EZPW), Greatoo Intelligent Equipment (002031.SZ), CreditAccess Grameen (CREDITACC.NS), Metro Bank (MTRO.L), Sammaan Capital (SAMMAANCAP.NS).
Is Zip expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 3.74× against a peer median of 1.54×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 66.6%; Zip delivers 16.8%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Zip stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.2% against -3.9% for the median peer; over one year -42.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.