Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Walker & Dunlop, Inc.WDCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Financials›Finance/Rental/Leasing

Commercial real estate finance company originating and servicing multifamily and commercial mortgage loans.

Momentum weak 37
Mkt cap
$1.34B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$20.0M
20-day average traded
P/B
0.76×
price to book
ROE
2.2%
delivered
Implied ROE
10.0%
what the price asks
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$39.05
1D-2.0%
1W+12.2%
1M+13.6%
3M-10.0%
6M-28.5%
YTD-35.1%
1Y-51.2%
ATR %4.3%
Beta0.90
52w lowhigh48.3% off high

What Walker & Dunlop does

Commercial real estate finance company originating and servicing multifamily and commercial mortgage loans.

Originates loans and sells most agency loans to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or into Ginnie Mae securities while keeping the right to service them, so a recurring servicing fee builds on a large portfolio while origination fees swing with deal volume and interest rates. The 2021 purchase of Alliant, an affordable-housing tax-credit investment manager, widened it beyond lending.

Products and services

  • Multifamily mortgage origination (Fannie/Freddie/HUD)
  • Commercial mortgage brokerage
  • Loan servicing

Customers

  • Multifamily/commercial property owners and investo

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Financials
  • Commercial real estate finance
  • Multifamily/commercial mortgage…

What could go right

  • Multifamily transaction/refinancing volume recovery
  • Commercial real estate capital markets activity

What could go wrong

  • Interest-rate sensitivity of transaction volume
  • Commercial real estate credit cycle risk

Moat: narrow (scale, regulatory licence, distribution). Approved-lender status with Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac/HUD is a licensed, limited-competitor advantage.

Headquarters: Bethesda, Maryland, US · Founded: 1937 · Employees: 1,466

Named competitors

Walker & Dunlop at a glance

Size Walker & Dunlop (WD) is a United States Financials company (Finance/Rental/Leasing) with a market value of $1.34B, the 2067th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $39.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.5%, against +2.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.9%); the operating margin is 15.2% (peer median 14.2%).

Valuation It trades at 0.76× book value against a peer median of 1.31× (3rd cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 10.0%; Walker & Dunlop delivers 2.2%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Short interest Short interest is 6.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 103WD 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Walker & Dunlop against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Walker & Dunlop financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.27B$1.27B$1.15B$1.10B$1.29B
Revenue growth—+10%+4%-15%—
Gross profit$951M$1.03B$913M$875M$1.06B
EBITDA$468M$523M$479M$473M$573M
Net income$37.4M$54.9M$106M$105M$208M
Free cash flow-$131M-$680M$116M-$16.7M$1.56B
Capital expenditure$12.1M$15.8M$13.0M$16.2M$22.0M
Total debt$2.38B$2.69B$1.93B$1.61B$1.57B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Walker & Dunlop competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%+20%+40%603300FIVESTAR99411905ATLC4665ZIGUPBDAIF9678PRG2666HOMEFIRST8566089860MTROSBFCWD6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Walker & Dunlop is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-10%0%10%20×40×603300FIVESTAR99411905ATLC4665UPBDAIF96782666HOMEFIRST8566SAMMAANCAPSBFC002031WDReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Walker & Dunlop is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%20%40%0%20%40%603300FIVESTAR99411905ATLCZIGUPBDAIFHOMEFIRST8566SBFC002031WDROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Walker & Dunlop is the large dot.

Walker & Dunlop competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (WD vs CBRE vs JLL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Walker & Dunlop WD$1.34B-28%+9%2%0.76×10.0%
CBRE CBRE$39.1B-7%+14%16%4.51×39.3%
Jones Lang LaSalle JLL$16.9B+12%+11%15%2.21×21.4%

How Walker & Dunlop compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Walker & Dunlop against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureWDPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.6%+1.7%7th highest of 21
6-month return-28.5%+2.1%2nd lowest of 21
Return on equity2.2%8.5%4th lowest of 21
Price / book0.76×1.31×3rd cheapest of 21
Trailing P/E34.8×13.6×most expensive of 18
ROE the price implies10.0%12.4%10th least demanding of 21
ROE delivered2.2%9.3%3rd lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Walker & Dunlop WDUnited States$1.34B-28%+9%2%0.76×10.0%2.2%
Zhejiang Haikong Nanke Huatie Digital Technology 603300.SSChina$1.34B-31%+12%5%1.29×9.8%5.3%
Five-Star Business Finance FIVESTAR.NSIndia$1.33B-10%+9%15%1.59×22.3%15.2%
Taiwan Acceptance 9941.TWTaiwan$1.31B-6%-3%12%1.10×3.8%12.2%
Haitong Unitrust International Financial Leasing 1905.HKHong Kong$1.38B+57%-20%6%0.52×4.2%6.5%
Atlanticus ATLCUnited States$1.38B+8%+84%23%1.97×24.5%22.9%
Duskin 4665.TJapan$1.40B+20%+3%7%1.43×5.4%6.7%
Zigup ZIG.LUnited Kingdom$1.41B+14%+3%7%0.96×12.8%7.1%
Upbound UPBDUnited States$1.41B+29%+3%16%1.88×23.5%15.5%
Altus AIF.TOCanada$1.26B+15%-7%-2%5.50×28.5%-2.2%
Kanamoto 9678.TJapan$1.23B+17%+2%9%1.20×6.4%9.3%
PROG PRGUnited States$1.47B+4%+10%17%1.82×23.0%17.3%
Genertec Universal Medical 2666.HKHong Kong$1.21B-19%0%12%0.41×5.1%11.6%
Home First Finance Company India HOMEFIRST.NSIndia$1.21B-10%+19%14%2.45×31.6%14.3%
Ricoh Leasing Company,Ltd 8566.TJapan$1.20B0%+4%5%0.77×4.3%5.3%
LOTTE rental 089860.KSSouth Korea$1.56B+74%+4%8%1.34×6.3%7.7%
Sammaan Capital SAMMAANCAP.NSIndia$1.61B-13%-60%-35%0.80×14.2%n/a
Metro Bank MTRO.LUnited Kingdom$1.63B+22%+1%4%0.94×12.1%4.3%
Hotai Finance 6592.TWTaiwan$1.08B-6%-9%10%0.92×3.4%9.7%
SBFC Finance SBFC.NSIndia$1.08B-5%+28%14%2.52×31.2%13.6%
Greatoo Intelligent Equipment 002031.SZChina$1.68B-11%-20%-13%6.07×54.9%-13.5%

Questions

Who are Walker & Dunlop's main competitors?
Named competitors: CBRE Group (CBRE), JLL (JLL). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zhejiang Haikong Nanke Huatie Digital Technology (603300.SS), Five-Star Business Finance (FIVESTAR.NS), Taiwan Acceptance (9941.TW), Haitong Unitrust International Financial Leasing (1905.HK), Atlanticus (ATLC), Duskin (4665.T).
Is Walker & Dunlop expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 0.76× against a peer median of 1.31×, 3rd cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 10.0%; Walker & Dunlop delivers 2.2%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Walker & Dunlop stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.5% against +2.1% for the median peer; over one year -51.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.