Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › JLL Jones Lang LaSalle IncorporatedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Jones Lang LaSalle IncorporatedJLLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Real Estate›Real Estate Development

Global commercial real estate services firm offering brokerage, leasing, investment management and facilities services.

Momentum leader 81
Mkt cap
$16.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$191M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 10.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BBB+ / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · USD$370.80
1D-1.2%
1W+3.1%
1M+22.3%
3M+3.8%
6M+12.4%
YTD+10.2%
1Y+28.9%
ATR %3.7%
Beta0.95
52w lowhigh6.3% off high

What Jones Lang LaSalle does

Global commercial real estate services firm offering brokerage, leasing, investment management and facilities services.

Commissions on property leases and sales swing with deal volume, while fees for running buildings and workplaces for companies, under multi-year contracts, are steadier and a large part of revenue. LaSalle adds fees on assets it manages for investors. It mostly acts as agent or adviser rather than as an owner of property.

Products and services

  • Commercial property leasing/sales brokerage
  • Facilities/property management
  • Real estate investment management (LaSalle)
  • Project/development management

Customers

  • Corporate occupiers
  • Property investors/landlords
  • Institutional real estate investors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Real estate
  • Commercial real estate services
  • Brokerage, property management…

What could go right

  • Growth in outsourced facilities management contracts
  • Commercial real estate transaction-volume recovery

What could go wrong

  • Commercial real estate transaction-volume cyclicality
  • Office-sector demand weakness (remote work)

Moat: narrow (scale, brand, installed base). Global broker network and long-running corporate outsourcing contracts across facilities/property management.

Headquarters: Chicago, Illinois, United States · Founded: 1783 · Employees: 113,200

Named competitors

Jones Lang LaSalle at a glance

Size Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) is a United States Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $16.9B, the 553rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $370.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 12.4%, against -6.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.2%); the operating margin is 5.2% (peer median 21.9%).

Valuation It trades at 13.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.8× (7th cheapest of 21).

Credit Jones Lang LaSalle has 1 bond outstanding ($400M), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 69 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026JLL 115Peer median 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Jones Lang LaSalle against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Jones Lang LaSalle financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$28.2B$26.1B$23.4B$20.8B$20.9B
Revenue growth—+11%+13%0%—
Gross profit$28.0B$25.9B$23.2B$20.5B$20.6B
EBITDA$1.69B$1.43B$1.15B$916M$1.20B
Net income$1.10B$792M$547M$225M$654M
Free cash flow$1.09B$1.03B$757M$413M$59.0M
Capital expenditure$246M$216M$186M$187M$206M
Total debt$3.22B$2.59B$2.95B$3.12B$3.24B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Jones Lang LaSalle competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%0%+10%+20%H78VNA0012068888301972DLF2423111300831997LODHA1209LI880100197960004811098802JLL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Jones Lang LaSalle is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×H78VNA0012068888301972DLF24231113SPSN00831997LODHA120988010019796000481109JLLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Jones Lang LaSalle is the large dot.

Jones Lang LaSalle competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (JLL vs CBRE vs CWK vs CIGI.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Jones Lang LaSalle JLL$16.9B+12%+11%5%13.4×n/a
CBRE CBRE$39.1B-7%+14%3%16.3×n/a
Cushman & Wakefield CWK$3.28B-2%+10%4%8.8×n/a
Colliers International CIGI.TO$4.88B-5%+14%7%11.8×n/a
Newmark NMRK$2.16B-29%+16%7%6.1×n/a
Savills SVS.L$2.56B+37%+7%5%13.4×n/a
Marcus & Millichap MMI$1.05B-9%+12%1%56.1×n/a

How Jones Lang LaSalle compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Jones Lang LaSalle against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureJLLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+22.3%+7.5%highest of 21
6-month return+12.4%-6.2%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-6.3%-15.6%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.4%+1.2%6th highest of 21
Operating margin5.2%21.9%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E13.4×17.8×7th cheapest of 21
Bond spread69 bp103 bp3rd tightest of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Jones Lang LaSalle JLLUnited States$16.9B+12%+11%5%13.4×n/an/a
Hongkong Land H78.SISingapore$17.7B-1%-25%23%20.9×n/an/a
Vonovia VNA.DEGermany$16.1B-24%-17%40%9.4×n/an/a
Henderson Land 0012.HKHong Kong$18.3B-12%+46%20%17.2×n/an/a
China Overseas 0688.HKHong Kong$18.4B-13%+4%11%10.2×n/an/a
Sumitomo Realty & Development C 8830.TJapan$18.8B-34%+5%29%12.8×n/an/a
Swire Properties 1972.HKHong Kong$19.4B+4%+6%49%18.3×n/an/a
DLF DLF.NSIndia$19.7B+22%-29%13%38.3×n/an/a
KE Holdings, Inc. Class A 2423.HKHong Kong$21.4B+3%-11%6%16.8×n/an/a
CK Asset 1113.HKHong Kong$21.9B-3%+48%15%12.8×n/an/a
Swiss Prime Site SPSN.SWSwitzerland$13.0B+1%-12%76%31.7×n/an/a
Sino Land 0083.HKHong Kong$12.8B-20%+15%34%20.4×n/an/a
Wharf Reic 1997.HKHong Kong$12.6B+24%-1%73%14.8×n/an/a
Lodha Developers LODHA.NSIndia$12.5B+22%+21%31%27.0×n/an/a
China Res Mixc 1209.HKHong Kong$12.1B-14%+10%28%18.4×n/an/a
Klepierre LI.PAFrance$11.6B+8%+3%63%13.1×n/an/a
Mitsui Fudosan 8801.TJapan$27.4B-5%-10%14%14.9×n/an/a
China Merchants Shekou Industrial Zone 001979.SZChina$10.4B-10%-22%1%69.7×n/an/a
Poly Developments & 600048.SSChina$10.1B-9%-4%4%48.6×n/an/a
China Res Land 1109.HKHong Kong$29.1B-7%-12%16%8.9×n/an/a
Mitsubishi Estate 8802.TJapan$29.5B-12%+17%21%19.2×n/an/a

Jones Lang LaSalle bonds and credit

Jones Lang LaSalle has 1 bond outstanding with $400M face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.16%, a spread of 69 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Jones Lang LaSalle's main competitors?
Named competitors: CBRE Group (CBRE), Cushman & Wakefield (CWK), Colliers International (CIGI.TO), Newmark Group (NMRK), Savills (SVS.L), Marcus & Millichap (MMI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hongkong Land (H78.SI), Vonovia (VNA.DE), Henderson Land (0012.HK), China Overseas (0688.HK), Sumitomo Realty & Development C (8830.T), Swire Properties (1972.HK).
Is Jones Lang LaSalle expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.4× against a peer median of 17.8×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Jones Lang LaSalle stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +12.4% against -6.2% for the median peer; over one year +28.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.