Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BWLPG.OL BW LPG LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

BW LPG LimitedBWLPG.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Energy›Marine Shipping

World's largest owner-operator of LPG gas carriers, shipping liquefied petroleum gas from exporters to importers globally.

≈ World's largest owner/operator of LPG gas carriersMomentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$3.31B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.48M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.3 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-44 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · NOKNOK 203.60
1D-3.1%
1W-11.8%
1M-17.8%
3M0.0%
6M+6.5%
YTD+54.2%
1Y+51.9%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh20.2% off high

What BW LPG does

World's largest owner-operator of LPG gas carriers, shipping liquefied petroleum gas from exporters to importers globally.

Hires out its very large gas carriers mostly to LPG producers and traders, spot or on time charters, so earnings swing sharply with freight rates. A product-trading arm adds margin from buying and selling cargoes. BW Group, a Singapore-based shipping group of the Sohmen family, is the largest shareholder.

In one line: World's largest owner/operator of LPG gas carriers.

Products and services

  • VLGC (very large LPG carrier) shipping
  • LPG trading & optimization
  • LPG terminal/product services

Customers

  • LPG producers/exporters (US, Middle East)
  • Importers in Asia

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy logistics
  • Marine shipping
  • LPG carrier transport

What could go right

  • Rising US LPG export volumes
  • LPG demand growth in Asia

What could go wrong

  • Freight rate cyclicality
  • Newbuild vessel oversupply risk

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Largest VLGC fleet with scale advantages in a specialized, capital-intensive shipping niche.

Headquarters: Singapore · Founded: 2013 · Employees: 1,444

Named competitors

BW LPG at a glance

Size BW LPG (BWLPG.OL) is a Norway Energy company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $3.31B, the 28th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 203.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.5%, against +6.8% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 9.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +29.1%); the operating margin is 15.4% (peer median 41.1%).

Valuation It trades at 4.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 5.5× (8th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +37%, so the hurdle is -44 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.3 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 108BWLPG.OL 108
Six months, rebased to 100: BW LPG against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

BW LPG financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 34.6BNOK 37.2BNOK 38.3BNOK 31.2BNOK 15.0B
Revenue growth—-3%+23%+108%—
Gross profitNOK 7.72BNOK 5.37BNOK 6.31BNOK 7.11BNOK 3.93B
EBITDANOK 7.82BNOK 5.76BNOK 6.58BNOK 7.41BNOK 3.91B
Net incomeNOK 4.36BNOK 2.52BNOK 3.81BNOK 4.97BNOK 2.19B
Free cash flowNOK 5.86BNOK 3.57BNOK 1.57BNOK 4.04BNOK 4.18B
Capital expenditureNOK 452MNOK 1.89BNOK 6.48BNOK 1.23BNOK 445M
Total debtNOK 9.23BNOK 9.99BNOK 13.3BNOK 5.79BNOK 6.95B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

BW LPG competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-15%-10%DHTECOTDWTNKTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIINSWLPGSFLNATFLNGNVGSFROBWLPG.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. BW LPG is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%5×10×DHTECOTDWTNKTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIINSWLPGSFLNATFLNGTENNVGSFROBWLPG.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. BW LPG is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%DHTECOTDWTRMD-AHAFNIINSWLPGSFLNATFLNGBWLPG.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. BW LPG is the large dot.

BW LPG competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BWLPG.OL vs LPG vs GASS vs NVGS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
BW LPG BWLPG.OL$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%
Dorian LPG LPG$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%
StealthGas GASSn/a-20%n/an/an/an/a
Navigator NVGS$1.21B-14%+7%25%11.0×-2.2%
Mitsui O.s.k. Lines 9104.T$15.0B+10%+20%6%7.3×n/a

How BW LPG compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

BW LPG against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBWLPG.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.8%-17.7%9th lowest of 18
6-month return+6.5%+6.8%9th lowest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-20.2%-22.0%4th highest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)-9.4%+29.1%lowest of 18
Operating margin15.4%41.1%lowest of 18
Forward P/E4.5×5.5×8th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.1%-6.3%6th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+37.2%+11.2%highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-44.3 pp-18.5 ppleast demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.3 pp+7.7 pp9th lowest of 18
EV / EBITDA4.9×7.0×4th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×0.9×8th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
BW LPG BWLPG.OLNorway$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%+37.2%
DHT DHTUnited States$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%-6.4%
Okeanis Eco Tankers ECOUnited States$3.19B+48%+105%62%3.9×-13.7%+6.7%
Tidewater TDWUnited States$3.49B-14%-1%18%13.3×1.2%+27.8%
Teekay Tankers TNKUnited States$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/an/a
TORM TRMD-A.CODenmark$3.87B+8%+41%41%3.5×-17.3%+12.7%
Scorpio Tankers STNGUnited States$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/an/a
Cmb.tech CMBTUnited States$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/an/a
Hafnia HAFNI.OLNorway$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%+23.6%
International Seaways INSWUnited States$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%+14.9%
Dorian LPG LPGUnited States$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%+8.8%
SFL SFLUnited States$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%+9.2%
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a
Navigator NVGSUnited States$1.21B-14%+7%25%11.0×-2.2%+12.0%
Teekay TKUnited States$1.11B-10%+16%48%n/an/an/a
Frontline FROUnited States$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%+10.3%

Questions

Who are BW LPG's main competitors?
Named competitors: Dorian LPG (LPG), Avance Gas Holding (private or unlisted), StealthGas (GASS), Exmar (private or unlisted), Navigator Holdings (NVGS), Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (9104.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes DHT (DHT), Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO), Tidewater (TDW), Teekay Tankers (TNK), TORM (TRMD-A.CO), Scorpio Tankers (STNG).
Is BW LPG expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.5× against a peer median of 5.5×, 8th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +37%, so the hurdle is -44 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has BW LPG stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.5% against +6.8% for the median peer; over one year +51.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.