Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › INSW International Seaways, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

International Seaways, Inc.INSWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Marine Shipping

US-based owner-operator of crude oil and petroleum-product tankers operating globally.

Momentum neutral 54
Mkt cap
$5.01B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
85%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$92.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
3.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+15.8 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
-30 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · USD$98.02
1D+3.8%
1W-12.4%
1M-19.5%
3M+8.4%
6M+7.0%
YTD+101.9%
1Y+95.5%
ATR %5.3%
Beta0.39
52w lowhigh22.4% off high

What International Seaways does

US-based owner-operator of crude oil and petroleum-product tankers operating globally.

Earns freight by renting ship capacity, either voyage by voyage at spot rates or on time charters of set length, with a large spot share. Daily rates therefore swing with oil trade flows and the supply of ships. It became an independent company in 2016, when it was spun out of Overseas Shipholding Group.

Products and services

  • Crude oil tankers (VLCC, Suezmax, Aframax)
  • Product tankers (MR, LR1)

Customers

  • Oil majors
  • Trading houses
  • Refiners

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy transportation
  • Marine shipping
  • Crude and product tankers

What could go right

  • Tanker freight-rate upcycle
  • Fleet age/efficiency advantage

What could go wrong

  • Tanker rate cyclicality
  • Geopolitical shipping disruption risk

Moat: none (scale). Commodity tanker shipping; earnings driven by cyclical spot freight rates.

Headquarters: New York, New York, USA · Founded: 2016 · Employees: 2,763

Named competitors

International Seaways at a glance

Size International Seaways (INSW) is a United States Energy company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $5.01B, the 1186th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $98.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 7.0%, against +6.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 57.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +29.1%); the operating margin is 55.6% (peer median 38.8%).

Valuation It trades at 3.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 5.4× (3rd cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -30 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.8 points above its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 5.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026INSW 109Peer median 108
Six months, rebased to 100: International Seaways against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

International Seaways financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.26B$843M$952M$1.07B$866M
Revenue growth—-11%-11%+24%—
Gross profit$750M$357M$478M$628M$471M
EBITDA$864M$470M$575M$709M$535M
Net income$779M$309M$417M$556M$388M
Free cash flow$269M$38.1M$267M$482M$171M
Capital expenditure$364M$342M$280M$207M$117M
Total debt$653M$576M$712M$745M$1.07B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

International Seaways competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-15%-10%HAFNICMBTSTNGTRMD-ATDWDHTBWLPGECOTNKFROLPGSFLNATFLNGINSW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. International Seaways is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%5×10×HAFNICMBTSTNGTRMD-ATDWDHTBWLPGECOTNKFROLPGSFLNATFLNGTENINSWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. International Seaways is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%HAFNITRMD-ATDWDHTBWLPGECOLPGSFLNATFLNGINSWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. International Seaways is the large dot.

International Seaways competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (INSW vs FRO vs CMBT vs STNG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
International Seaways INSW$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%
Frontline FRO$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%
Cmb.tech CMBT$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/a
Scorpio Tankers STNG$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/a

How International Seaways compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

International Seaways against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureINSWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-19.5%-17.4%5th lowest of 16
6-month return+7.0%+6.8%8th highest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-22.4%-21.6%7th lowest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+57.7%+29.1%4th highest of 16
Operating margin55.6%38.8%3rd highest of 16
Forward P/E3.5×5.4×3rd cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-14.8%-6.7%2nd least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.9%+10.3%5th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-29.7 pp-20.4 pp3rd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+15.8 pp+6.3 pp3rd highest of 16
EV / EBITDA6.1×7.0×6th cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×0.8×4th least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
International Seaways INSWUnited States$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%+14.9%
Hafnia HAFNI.OLNorway$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%+23.6%
Cmb.tech CMBTUnited States$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/an/a
Scorpio Tankers STNGUnited States$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/an/a
TORM TRMD-A.CODenmark$3.87B+8%+41%41%3.5×-17.3%+12.7%
Tidewater TDWUnited States$3.49B-14%-1%18%13.3×1.2%+27.8%
DHT DHTUnited States$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%-6.4%
BW LPG BWLPG.OLNorway$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%+37.2%
Okeanis Eco Tankers ECOUnited States$3.19B+48%+105%62%3.9×-13.7%+6.7%
Teekay Tankers TNKUnited States$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/an/a
Frontline FROUnited States$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%+10.3%
Dorian LPG LPGUnited States$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%+8.8%
SFL SFLUnited States$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%+9.2%
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a

Questions

Who are International Seaways's main competitors?
Named competitors: Frontline (FRO), CMB.TECH (CMBT), Scorpio Tankers (STNG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hafnia (HAFNI.OL), Cmb.tech (CMBT), Scorpio Tankers (STNG), TORM (TRMD-A.CO), Tidewater (TDW), DHT (DHT).
Is International Seaways expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 3.5× against a peer median of 5.4×, 3rd cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -30 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has International Seaways stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +7.0% against +6.8% for the median peer; over one year +95.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.