Loading…

FLEX LNG LtdFLNGCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Marine Shipping

Owner and operator of a modern fleet of LNG carriers transporting liquefied natural gas on long-term charters.

≈ A modern LNG-carrier shipping companyMomentum weak 24
Mkt cap
$1.38B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
57%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.9 pp
WACC 5.8%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · USD$26.06
1D+0.5%
1W-8.1%
1M-17.4%
3M-14.1%
6M-20.4%
YTD+4.5%
1Y-0.2%
ATR %3.2%
Beta-0.04
52w lowhigh22.0% off high

What FLEX LNG does

Owner and operator of a modern fleet of LNG carriers transporting liquefied natural gas on long-term charters.

Rents out ships by the day under time charters, where the customer pays daily hire and buys the fuel, on terms from one year to several, with a share on short-term deals priced to the spot market, so earnings follow charter rates. John Fredriksen's interests control the company, which pays out most of its cash flow as dividends.

In one line: A modern LNG-carrier shipping company.

Products and services

  • LNG carrier chartering
  • Long-term & spot charters

Customers

  • LNG exporters/producers
  • Energy traders
  • Utilities

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy/shipping
  • LNG carrier shipping
  • Liquefied natural gas transport

What could go right

  • Global LNG trade growth
  • Long-term charter rate strength

What could go wrong

  • Charter-rate cyclicality at renewal
  • LNG carrier newbuild oversupply

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage). Young, fuel-efficient LNG carrier fleet lowers operating costs versus older global LNG fleet.

Headquarters: Hamilton, Bermuda · Founded: 2017 · Employees: 9

Named competitors

  • Golar LNG GLNG
  • Cool Company private or unlisted
  • Awilco LNG private or unlisted

FLEX LNG at a glance

Size FLEX LNG (FLNG) is a United States Energy company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $1.38B, the 2048th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $26.06 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.4%, against +6.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +23.2%); the operating margin is 49.5% (peer median 38.3%).

Valuation It trades at 11.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 4.9× (2nd most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points above its cost of capital (5.8% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 8.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 108FLNG 80
Six months, rebased to 100: FLEX LNG against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

FLEX LNG financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$360M$348M$356M$371M$348M
Revenue growth—-2%-4%+7%—
Gross profit$186M$184M$208M$228M$210M
EBITDA$256M$252M$273M$291M$273M
Net income$103M$74.8M$118M$120M$188M
Free cash flow$159M$141M$183M$175M$209M
Capital expenditure$0$0$4,000$2,000$5,000
Total debt$1.79B$1.85B$1.81B$1.81B$1.71B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

FLEX LNG competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-15%-10%NATTENNVGSSFLTKLPGASCTNKECOBWLPGDHTTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIFLNG6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. FLEX LNG is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%5×10×NATTENNVGSSFLLPGASCTNKECOBWLPGDHTTDWTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIINSWFLNGRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. FLEX LNG is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%NATNVGSSFLLPGASCECOBWLPGDHTTDWTRMD-AHAFNIINSWFLNGGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. FLEX LNG is the large dot.

FLEX LNG competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (FLNG vs GLNG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
FLEX LNG FLNG$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%
Golar LNG GLNG$4.40B-23%+95%46%n/an/a

How FLEX LNG compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

FLEX LNG against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFLNGPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.4%-17.7%9th highest of 18
6-month return-20.4%+6.5%lowest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-22.0%-21.5%8th lowest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.3%+23.2%4th lowest of 18
Operating margin49.5%38.3%5th highest of 18
Forward P/E11.5×4.9×2nd most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.5%-6.9%3rd most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.1%+10.6%4th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-16.6 pp-21.2 pp6th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.9 pp+6.3 pp4th lowest of 18
EV / EBITDA10.8×6.2×most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA5.5×0.8×most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a
Navigator NVGSUnited States$1.21B-14%+7%25%11.0×-2.2%+12.0%
SFL SFLUnited States$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%+9.2%
Teekay TKUnited States$1.11B-10%+16%48%n/an/an/a
Dorian LPG LPGUnited States$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%+8.8%
Ardmore Shipping ASCUnited States$712M-11%+21%29%4.1×-14.9%+7.1%
Teekay Tankers TNKUnited States$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/an/a
Okeanis Eco Tankers ECOUnited States$3.19B+48%+105%62%3.9×-13.7%+6.7%
BW LPG BWLPG.OLNorway$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%+37.2%
DHT DHTUnited States$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%-6.4%
Tidewater TDWUnited States$3.49B-14%-1%18%13.3×1.2%+27.8%
TORM TRMD-A.CODenmark$3.87B+8%+41%41%3.5×-17.3%+12.7%
Scorpio Tankers STNGUnited States$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/an/a
Cmb.tech CMBTUnited States$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/an/a
Hafnia HAFNI.OLNorway$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%+23.6%
International Seaways INSWUnited States$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%+14.9%

Questions

Who are FLEX LNG's main competitors?
Named competitors: Golar LNG (GLNG), Cool Company (private or unlisted), Awilco LNG (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nordic American Tankers (NAT), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN), Navigator (NVGS), SFL (SFL), Teekay (TK), Dorian LPG (LPG).
Is FLEX LNG expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.5× against a peer median of 4.9×, 2nd most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has FLEX LNG stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.4% against +6.5% for the median peer; over one year -0.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.