Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › HAFNI.OL Hafnia LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Hafnia LimitedHAFNI.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Energy›Marine Shipping

One of the world's largest product tanker fleet operators, transporting refined petroleum products for oil majors and traders.

≈ One of the world's largest product tanker fleet operatorsMomentum strong 79
Mkt cap
$4.98B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.66M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.0 pp
WACC 7.0%
Hurdle
-29 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · NOKNOK 87.45
1D-3.9%
1W-12.7%
1M-14.2%
3M+24.5%
6M+6.8%
YTD+60.8%
1Y+40.0%
ATR %4.6%
52w lowhigh17.5% off high

What Hafnia does

One of the world's largest product tanker fleet operators, transporting refined petroleum products for oil majors and traders.

Earns freight by renting ship capacity, either voyage by voyage at spot rates or on time charters of fixed length, and collects fees from other owners' tankers it manages in commercial pools. This is the Oslo listing of Hafnia, formed in 2019 from BW Group's product-tanker fleet and Hafnia; BW Group is the largest shareholder.

In one line: One of the world's largest product tanker fleet operators.

Products and services

  • MR/LR product tankers
  • Time charters
  • Spot voyage charters

Customers

  • Oil majors
  • Refiners
  • Trading houses

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy logistics
  • Marine shipping
  • Refined product tanker transport

What could go right

  • Tight product tanker vessel supply
  • Refined product trade growth

What could go wrong

  • Freight rate cyclicality
  • Bunker fuel cost volatility

Moat: none (scale). Commodity tanker shipping; large fleet scale gives pooling advantages but rates are market-set.

Headquarters: Singapore · Founded: 2003 · Employees: 4,876

Named competitors

Hafnia at a glance

Size Hafnia (HAFNI.OL) is a Norway Energy company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $4.98B, the 21st largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 87.45 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.8%, against +7.0% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +39.4%); the operating margin is 20.1% (peer median 41.1%).

Valuation It trades at 5.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 4.5× (6th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +24%, so the hurdle is -29 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.0 points above its cost of capital (7.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026HAFNI.OL 109Peer median 108
Six months, rebased to 100: Hafnia against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

Hafnia financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 26.1BNOK 23.7BNOK 30.9BNOK 28.2BNOK 18.5B
Revenue growth—-23%+9%+52%—
Gross profitNOK 6.10BNOK 4.27BNOK 8.83BNOK 8.74BNOK 7.86B
EBITDANOK 7.18BNOK 5.49BNOK 10.3BNOK 10.2BNOK 9.30B
Net incomeNOK 6.40BNOK 3.53BNOK 8.32BNOK 8.39BNOK 7.23B
Free cash flowNOK 5.16BNOK 4.15BNOK 10.1BNOK 8.41BNOK 2.27B
Capital expenditureNOK 1.18BNOK 1.52BNOK 534MNOK 1.95BNOK 4.30B
Total debtNOK 8.76BNOK 11.3BNOK 12.7BNOK 13.1BNOK 17.5B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hafnia competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-15%-10%INSWCMBTSTNGTRMD-ATDWDHTBWLPGECOTNKFROLPGSFLNATFLNGTENHAFNI.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hafnia is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%5×10×INSWCMBTSTNGTRMD-ATDWDHTBWLPGECOTNKFROLPGSFLNATFLNGTENHAFNI.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hafnia is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%INSWTRMD-ATDWDHTBWLPGECOLPGSFLNATFLNGHAFNI.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hafnia is the large dot.

Hafnia competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (HAFNI.OL vs STNG vs DIS.MI vs TRMD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hafnia HAFNI.OL$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%
Scorpio Tankers STNG$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/a
d'Amico International Shipping DIS.MI$1.09B-3%-15%36%8.0×-7.3%
TORM TRMD$3.52B+1%+36%41%3.2×-18.9%
Ardmore Shipping ASC$712M-11%+21%29%4.1×-14.9%

How Hafnia compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hafnia against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureHAFNI.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.2%-17.8%5th highest of 16
6-month return+6.8%+7.0%8th lowest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-17.5%-22.0%2nd highest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.1%+39.4%5th lowest of 16
Operating margin20.1%41.1%3rd lowest of 16
Forward P/E5.7×4.5×6th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.9%-7.1%5th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+23.6%+10.3%3rd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-29.5 pp-20.4 pp4th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.0 pp+7.7 pp7th lowest of 16
EV / EBITDA7.2×7.0×7th most expensive of 16
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×0.8×7th least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hafnia HAFNI.OLNorway$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%+23.6%
International Seaways INSWUnited States$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%+14.9%
Cmb.tech CMBTUnited States$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/an/a
Scorpio Tankers STNGUnited States$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/an/a
TORM TRMD-A.CODenmark$3.87B+8%+41%41%3.5×-17.3%+12.7%
Tidewater TDWUnited States$3.49B-14%-1%18%13.3×1.2%+27.8%
DHT DHTUnited States$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%-6.4%
BW LPG BWLPG.OLNorway$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%+37.2%
Okeanis Eco Tankers ECOUnited States$3.19B+48%+105%62%3.9×-13.7%+6.7%
Teekay Tankers TNKUnited States$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/an/a
Frontline FROUnited States$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%+10.3%
Dorian LPG LPGUnited States$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%+8.8%
SFL SFLUnited States$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%+9.2%
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Hafnia's main competitors?
Named competitors: Scorpio Tankers (STNG), d'Amico International Shipping (DIS.MI), Torm plc (TRMD), Ardmore Shipping (ASC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes International Seaways (INSW), Cmb.tech (CMBT), Scorpio Tankers (STNG), TORM (TRMD-A.CO), Tidewater (TDW), DHT (DHT).
Is Hafnia expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.7× against a peer median of 4.5×, 6th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +24%, so the hurdle is -29 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Hafnia stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.8% against +7.0% for the median peer; over one year +40.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.