Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SFL SFL Corporation LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

SFL Corporation LimitedSFLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Marine Shipping

Diversified maritime asset owner leasing tankers, containerships, dry bulk carriers and offshore rigs on long-term charters.

≈ A diversified ship-leasing company, part of the Fredriksen groupMomentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$1.65B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
75%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.2 pp
WACC 6.2%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · USD$10.96
1D-0.2%
1W-15.4%
1M-19.2%
3M-7.8%
6M-8.7%
YTD+40.3%
1Y+47.1%
ATR %4.4%
Beta0.46
52w lowhigh21.6% off high

What SFL does

Diversified maritime asset owner leasing tankers, containerships, dry bulk carriers and offshore rigs on long-term charters.

Leases ships and rigs to operators on long fixed-rate charters, so income comes as steady hire rather than spot freight rates, and it adds fleet through purchase-and-lease-back deals and newbuilds. Some charters include profit-sharing, which adds upside when markets are strong. Entities linked to John Fredriksen are its largest shareholder.

In one line: A diversified ship-leasing company, part of the Fredriksen group.

Products and services

  • Containership chartering
  • Tanker chartering
  • Dry bulk chartering
  • Offshore drilling rig leasing

Customers

  • Container liner operators
  • Oil majors
  • Offshore drillers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Shipping/energy leasing
  • Diversified vessel leasing
  • Long-term chartered maritime assets

What could go right

  • Long-term charter cash-flow stability
  • Fleet acquisitions from Fredriksen group

What could go wrong

  • Charter-rate cyclicality at renewal
  • Counterparty/charterer credit risk

Moat: narrow (scale, switching costs). Diversified fleet on long-term charters with major operators gives stable, contracted cash flows.

Headquarters: Hamilton, Bermuda · Founded: 2003 · Employees: 24

Named competitors

SFL at a glance

Size SFL (SFL) is a United States Energy company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $1.65B, the 1923rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $10.96 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.7%, against +6.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +23.2%); the operating margin is 27.8% (peer median 38.8%).

Valuation It trades at 11.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 4.9× (3rd most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.2 points below its cost of capital (6.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 2.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 108SFL 91
Six months, rebased to 100: SFL against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

SFL financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$752M$733M$904M$752M$670M
Revenue growth—-19%+20%+12%—
Gross profit$233M$196M$322M$244M$277M
EBITDA$436M$413M$540M$443M$451M
Net income$92.6M-$26.4M$131M$83.9M$203M
Free cash flow$184M$197M-$275M$78.7M-$247M
Capital expenditure$78.0M$70.5M$645M$264M$602M
Total debt$2.33B$2.57B$2.84B$2.57B$2.67B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SFL competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-15%-10%NATFLNGLPGTENNVGSTKTNKECOBWLPGDHTASCTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNISFL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SFL is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%5×10×NATFLNGLPGTENNVGSTNKECOBWLPGDHTTDWASCTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIINSWSFLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. SFL is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%NATFLNGLPGECOBWLPGDHTTDWASCTRMD-AHAFNIINSWSFLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. SFL is the large dot.

SFL competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SFL vs CMRE vs DAC vs GLNG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
SFL SFL$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%
Costamare CMRE$1.54B-28%-42%44%5.2×-6.9%
Danaos DAC$2.70B+10%+2%48%5.3×-8.7%
Golar LNG GLNG$4.40B-23%+95%46%n/an/a

How SFL compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SFL against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSFLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-19.2%-17.4%6th lowest of 18
6-month return-8.7%+6.5%6th lowest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-21.6%-21.5%9th lowest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.4%+23.2%2nd lowest of 18
Operating margin27.8%38.8%5th lowest of 18
Forward P/E11.2×4.9×3rd most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.2%-6.9%most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.2%+12.4%6th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.1 pp-21.2 pp2nd most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.2 pp+6.3 pplowest of 18
EV / EBITDA8.9×6.2×4th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA5.1×0.8×2nd most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
SFL SFLUnited States$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%+9.2%
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Dorian LPG LPGUnited States$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%+8.8%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a
Navigator NVGSUnited States$1.21B-14%+7%25%11.0×-2.2%+12.0%
Teekay TKUnited States$1.11B-10%+16%48%n/an/an/a
Teekay Tankers TNKUnited States$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/an/a
Okeanis Eco Tankers ECOUnited States$3.19B+48%+105%62%3.9×-13.7%+6.7%
BW LPG BWLPG.OLNorway$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%+37.2%
DHT DHTUnited States$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%-6.4%
Tidewater TDWUnited States$3.49B-14%-1%18%13.3×1.2%+27.8%
Ardmore Shipping ASCUnited States$712M-11%+21%29%4.1×-14.9%+7.1%
TORM TRMD-A.CODenmark$3.87B+8%+41%41%3.5×-17.3%+12.7%
Scorpio Tankers STNGUnited States$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/an/a
Cmb.tech CMBTUnited States$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/an/a
Hafnia HAFNI.OLNorway$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%+23.6%
International Seaways INSWUnited States$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%+14.9%

Questions

Who are SFL's main competitors?
Named competitors: Costamare (CMRE), Danaos Corporation (DAC), Golar LNG (GLNG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nordic American Tankers (NAT), FLEX LNG (FLNG), Dorian LPG (LPG), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN), Navigator (NVGS), Teekay (TK).
Is SFL expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.2× against a peer median of 4.9×, 3rd most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has SFL stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.7% against +6.5% for the median peer; over one year +47.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.