Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DHT DHT Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

DHT Holdings, Inc.DHTCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Marine Shipping

Owner and operator of a fleet of very large crude carriers (VLCCs) transporting crude oil worldwide.

≈ A pure-play VLCC crude tanker companyMomentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$3.33B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
89%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$136M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
3.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.9 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · USD$20.68
1D+1.0%
1W-17.4%
1M-17.1%
3M+12.8%
6M+8.8%
YTD+69.4%
1Y+56.3%
ATR %5.4%
Beta0.36
52w lowhigh23.1% off high

What DHT does

Owner and operator of a fleet of very large crude carriers (VLCCs) transporting crude oil worldwide.

Earns freight by hiring out its tankers either per voyage at the going spot rate or on multi-year time charters at fixed daily rates, so results swing with tanker demand and fleet supply. It owns only very large crude carriers, so the business is one ship type and one cargo.

In one line: A pure-play VLCC crude tanker company.

Products and services

  • VLCC spot & time charters
  • Crude oil transportation

Customers

  • Oil majors
  • National oil companies
  • Trading houses

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy/shipping
  • Crude tanker shipping
  • VLCC crude oil transport

What could go right

  • Crude tanker rate upcycle
  • Long-haul crude trade-flow shifts

What could go wrong

  • Crude freight-rate cyclicality
  • Oil demand/geopolitical risk

Moat: narrow (scale). Modern, focused VLCC fleet with long relationships among major oil charterers.

Headquarters: Hamilton, Bermuda · Founded: 2005 · Employees: 737

Named competitors

DHT at a glance

Size DHT (DHT) is a United States Energy company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $3.33B, the 1475th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $20.68 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.8%, against +6.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 39.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +23.2%); the operating margin is 56.7% (peer median 38.8%).

Valuation It trades at 3.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 5.5× (5th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -6%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.9 points above its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 9.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026DHT 110Peer median 108
Six months, rebased to 100: DHT against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

DHT financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$722M$497M$568M$556M$450M
Revenue growth—-12%+2%+23%—
Gross profit$429M$190M$198M$206M$67.8M
EBITDA$516M$276M$291M$298M$174M
Net income$474M$211M$181M$161M$61.5M
Free cash flow$36.3M-$33.3M$202M$123M$118M
Capital expenditure$416M$310M$97.0M$128M$10.1M
Total debt$435M$434M$414M$435M$401M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

DHT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-15%-10%BWLPGECOTDWTNKTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIINSWLPGSFLNATFLNGNVGSFRODHT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. DHT is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%5×10×BWLPGECOTDWTNKTRMD-ASTNGCMBTHAFNIINSWLPGSFLNATFLNGTENNVGSFRODHTRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. DHT is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%BWLPGECOTDWTRMD-AHAFNIINSWLPGSFLNATFLNGDHTGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. DHT is the large dot.

DHT competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (DHT vs FRO vs INSW vs TNK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
DHT DHT$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%
Frontline FRO$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%
International Seaways INSW$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%
Teekay Tankers TNK$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/a

How DHT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

DHT against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDHTPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.1%-17.8%6th highest of 18
6-month return+8.8%+6.5%6th highest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-23.1%-21.6%4th lowest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)+39.4%+23.2%8th highest of 18
Operating margin56.7%38.8%2nd highest of 18
Forward P/E3.8×5.5×5th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-11.7%-6.3%5th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)-6.4%+12.4%lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.3 pp-21.6 pp3rd most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.9 pp+6.3 pp5th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA7.0×6.6×8th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×0.9×5th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
DHT DHTUnited States$3.33B+9%+39%57%3.8×-11.7%-6.4%
BW LPG BWLPG.OLNorway$3.31B+7%-9%15%4.5×-7.1%+37.2%
Okeanis Eco Tankers ECOUnited States$3.19B+48%+105%62%3.9×-13.7%+6.7%
Tidewater TDWUnited States$3.49B-14%-1%18%13.3×1.2%+27.8%
Teekay Tankers TNKUnited States$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/an/a
TORM TRMD-A.CODenmark$3.87B+8%+41%41%3.5×-17.3%+12.7%
Scorpio Tankers STNGUnited States$4.13B-4%+39%49%5.6×n/an/a
Cmb.tech CMBTUnited States$4.83B+12%+92%30%7.2×n/an/a
Hafnia HAFNI.OLNorway$4.98B+7%+3%20%5.7×-5.9%+23.6%
International Seaways INSWUnited States$5.01B+7%+58%56%3.5×-14.8%+14.9%
Dorian LPG LPGUnited States$1.99B+16%+81%52%5.4×-6.7%+8.8%
SFL SFLUnited States$1.65B-9%-4%28%11.2×5.2%+9.2%
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a
Navigator NVGSUnited States$1.21B-14%+7%25%11.0×-2.2%+12.0%
Teekay TKUnited States$1.11B-10%+16%48%n/an/an/a
Frontline FROUnited States$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%+10.3%

Questions

Who are DHT's main competitors?
Named competitors: Frontline plc (FRO), International Seaways (INSW), Teekay Tankers (TNK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes BW LPG (BWLPG.OL), Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO), Tidewater (TDW), Teekay Tankers (TNK), TORM (TRMD-A.CO), Scorpio Tankers (STNG).
Is DHT expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 3.8× against a peer median of 5.5×, 5th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -6%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has DHT stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.8% against +6.5% for the median peer; over one year +56.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.