Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9104.T Mitsui O.s.k. Lines LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Mitsui O.s.k. Lines Ltd9104.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Major Japanese shipping company operating dry bulk, tanker, LNG and car-carrier fleets, plus container shipping via an alliance.

≈ A Japanese peer to Maersk-scale global shipping conglomeratesMomentum strong 73
Mkt cap
$15.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
86%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$148M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥6,516
1D-6.6%
1W-12.6%
1M-8.8%
3M+12.3%
6M+9.8%
YTD+40.6%
1Y+49.5%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh15.4% off high

What Mitsui O.s.k. Lines does

Major Japanese shipping company operating dry bulk, tanker, LNG and car-carrier fleets, plus container shipping via an alliance.

Earns charter hire and freight: LNG and car-carrier ships are mostly on long contracts, while dry bulk ships earn market rates that move with trade. Container shipping runs through Ocean Network Express, the 2018 venture with Nippon Yusen and K Line, so it appears as a share of the venture's profit.

In one line: A Japanese peer to Maersk-scale global shipping conglomerates.

Products and services

  • Dry bulk shipping
  • Car carrier shipping
  • LNG/energy shipping
  • Container shipping (via ONE alliance)

Customers

  • Global commodity exporters/importers
  • Automakers
  • Energy companies (LNG/oil)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Transportation/logistics
  • Ocean shipping
  • Dry bulk, tanker, LNG, car-carrier…

What could go right

  • Global trade/commodity shipping demand
  • Car-carrier demand from Asian auto exports

What could go wrong

  • Highly cyclical freight rates
  • Fuel/regulatory decarbonization costs

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Long-term charter contracts and a large diversified fleet built over a century of shipping operations.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1884 · Employees: 11,567

Named competitors

Mitsui O.s.k. Lines at a glance

Size Mitsui O.s.k. Lines (9104.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $15.0B, the 99th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥6,516 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 9.8%, against +16.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.8% over the last twelve months (peer median -1.6%); the operating margin is 6.0% (peer median 13.8%).

Valuation It trades at 7.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 8.9× (10th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.4 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1179104.T 110
Six months, rebased to 100: Mitsui O.s.k. Lines against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mitsui O.s.k. Lines financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥2.12T¥1.83T¥1.78T¥1.63T¥1.61T
Revenue growth—+3%+9%+1%—
Gross profit¥354B¥353B¥338B¥266B¥235B
EBITDA¥336B¥302B¥281B¥206B¥201B
Net income¥221B¥213B¥425B¥262B¥796B
Free cash flown/a-¥88.1B-¥93.7B-¥21.0B¥283B
Capital expendituren/a¥539B¥454B¥335B¥267B
Total debt¥2.60T¥2.50T¥1.85T¥1.30T¥1.15T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mitsui O.s.k. Lines competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%011200130826039101600026031660187291076010182615HLAGWAWIKNINKEX26091919MAERSK-A6004286018669104.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mitsui O.s.k. Lines is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%10×20×011200130826039101600026031660187291072615HLAGWAWIKNINKEX260919196004286018669104.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mitsui O.s.k. Lines is the large dot.

Mitsui O.s.k. Lines competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9104.T vs 9101.T vs 9107.T vs MAERSK-A.CO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mitsui O.s.k. Lines 9104.T$15.0B+10%+20%6%7.3×n/a
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 9101.T$16.8B+17%0%6%9.0×7.8%
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha 9107.T$11.0B+17%+11%8%9.4×7.3%
A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S MAERSK-A.CO$47.6B+44%-8%5%5.9×-1.3%
COSCO SHIPPING 1919.HK$38.5B+20%-5%13%6.0×-8.7%

How Mitsui O.s.k. Lines compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mitsui O.s.k. Lines against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9104.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.8%-3.7%5th lowest of 21
6-month return+9.8%+16.5%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-15.4%-15.9%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.8%-1.6%4th highest of 21
Operating margin6.0%13.8%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E7.3×8.9×10th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.4 pp+1.8 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA14.3×5.7×most expensive of 16
Net debt / EBITDA7.2×0.3×2nd most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mitsui O.s.k. Lines 9104.TJapan$15.0B+10%+20%6%7.3×n/an/a
HMM 011200.KSSouth Korea$15.3B+8%-5%11%9.7×-1.8%+11.2%
SITC International 1308.HKHong Kong$15.8B+34%+5%34%10.7×-0.4%+15.3%
Evergreen Marine Corp(taiwan) 2603.TWTaiwan$16.1B+28%-20%15%5.0×-9.1%+12.9%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 9101.TJapan$16.8B+17%0%6%9.0×7.8%+8.5%
COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation 600026.SSChina$13.2B-21%+38%33%6.1×-8.2%+7.8%
OOIL 0316.HKHong Kong$12.8B+10%-8%10%5.9×-2.3%+3.6%
China Merchants Energy Shipping 601872.SSChina$19.6B-8%+60%39%6.3×-9.5%+5.4%
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha 9107.TJapan$11.0B+17%+11%8%9.4×7.3%+10.2%
Ningbo Zhoushan Port 601018.SSChina$10.4B-4%+12%16%n/a-7.3%+7.6%
Wan Hai Lines 2615.TWTaiwan$9.12B+40%-14%22%5.8×-12.0%+11.4%
Hapag-Lloyd HLAG.DEGermany$25.1B+11%-9%2%18.5×34.4%+7.8%
Wallenius Wilhelmsen WAWI.OLNorway$7.58B+29%-11%25%10.4×-6.6%+21.0%
Kuehne & Nagel International KNIN.SWSwitzerland$34.3B+35%+1%5%25.4×3.2%+3.7%
Kirby KEXUnited States$6.39B-15%+8%14%14.6×6.2%+9.2%
Matson MATXUnited States$6.34B+16%0%14%10.9×11.8%+7.0%
Yang Ming Marine Transport 2609.TWTaiwan$6.03B+14%-22%6%6.5×n/an/a
COSCO SHIPPING 1919.HKHong Kong$38.5B+20%-5%13%6.0×-8.7%+4.3%
A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S MAERSK-A.CODenmark$47.6B+44%-8%5%5.9×-1.3%+6.6%
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers 600428.SSChina$4.40B+25%+37%19%8.9×-17.9%+27.0%
COSCO SHIPPING Development 601866.SSChina$3.87B-10%-3%13%3.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Mitsui O.s.k. Lines's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nippon Yusen (9101.T), Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (9107.T), A.P. Moller-Maersk (MAERSK-A.CO), COSCO Shipping (1919.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes HMM (011200.KS), SITC International (1308.HK), Evergreen Marine Corp(taiwan) (2603.TW), Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (9101.T), COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation (600026.SS), OOIL (0316.HK).
Is Mitsui O.s.k. Lines expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.3× against a peer median of 8.9×, 10th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Mitsui O.s.k. Lines stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +9.8% against +16.5% for the median peer; over one year +49.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.