Loading…

HMM011200.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Korean container-shipping line operating global container vessels and bulk carriers, majority state/policy-bank owned.

≈ Korea's Matson/CMA CGM peer — a container shipping line.Momentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$15.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$30.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.1 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
138 days
24 Mar 2027
Close · KRW₩22,050
1D-3.3%
1W-5.6%
1M+3.0%
3M+4.0%
6M+7.6%
YTD+10.9%
1Y+7.2%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh11.6% off high

What HMM does

Korean container-shipping line operating global container vessels and bulk carriers, majority state/policy-bank owned.

Earns freight on containers, with rates reset by the spot market and annual contracts, so earnings swing with global shipping supply. Korea's state creditors, the Korea Development Bank and the Korea Ocean Business Corporation, became its largest shareholders in the 2016 restructuring, and a planned sale of their stake to Harim Group collapsed.

In one line: Korea's Matson/CMA CGM peer — a container shipping line..

Products and services

  • Container liner shipping
  • Bulk carrier shipping
  • LNG carrier operations

Customers

  • global freight forwarders/shippers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Shipping/logistics
  • Container & bulk shipping
  • Container liner shipping, dry-bulk/LNG…

What could go right

  • Freight-rate upcycles (e.g., Red Sea disruption)
  • Fleet capacity growth

What could go wrong

  • Freight-rate cyclicality/oversupply
  • Global trade-volume slowdown

Moat: none (scale). Container shipping is a highly cyclical, commoditized business with limited pricing power outside freight-rate spikes.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1976 · Employees: 1,933

Named competitors

HMM at a glance

Size HMM (011200.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $15.3B, the 26th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩22,050 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 7.6%, against +16.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 5.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.2%); the operating margin is 10.7% (peer median 13.8%).

Valuation It trades at 9.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 7.3× (7th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.1 points below its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 117011200.KS 104
Six months, rebased to 100: HMM against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

HMM financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩11.5T₩10.9T₩11.7T₩8.40T₩18.6T
Revenue growth—-7%+39%-55%—
Gross profit₩1.79T₩1.98T₩3.92T₩933B₩10.4T
EBITDA₩2.51T₩2.58T₩4.42T₩1.46T₩10.8T
Net income₩1.43T₩1.87T₩3.74T₩883B₩10.1T
Free cash flow₩119B₩1.70T₩2.29T-₩137B₩10.6T
Capital expenditure₩2.71T₩1.60T₩2.54T₩2.04T₩486B
Total debt₩6.12T₩5.19T₩5.10T₩4.71T₩6.56T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

HMM competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%910413082603910160002603166018729107601018HLAG2615WAWIKNINKEX19192609MAERSK-A600428601866011200.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. HMM is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%10×20×910413082603910160002603166018729107HLAG2615WAWIKNINKEX19192609600428601866011200.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. HMM is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%13082603910160002603166018729107HLAG2615WAWIKNINMATXMAERSK-A600428011200.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. HMM is the large dot.

HMM competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (011200.KS vs MAERSK-A.CO vs 1919.HK vs 2603.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
HMM 011200.KS$15.3B+8%-5%11%9.7×-1.8%
A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S MAERSK-A.CO$47.6B+44%-8%5%5.9×-1.3%
COSCO SHIPPING 1919.HK$38.5B+20%-5%13%6.0×-8.7%
Evergreen Marine Corp(taiwan) 2603.TW$16.1B+28%-20%15%5.0×-9.1%

How HMM compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

HMM against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure011200.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.0%-4.8%5th highest of 21
6-month return+7.6%+16.5%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-11.6%-16.2%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-5.3%+0.2%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.7%13.8%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E9.7×7.3×7th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.8%-2.3%9th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.2%+7.8%6th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.0 pp-13.0 pp9th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.1 pp+1.8 pp7th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.7×8.2×8th cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA-2.6×0.4×2nd least indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
HMM 011200.KSSouth Korea$15.3B+8%-5%11%9.7×-1.8%+11.2%
Mitsui O.s.k. Lines 9104.TJapan$15.0B+10%+20%6%7.3×n/an/a
SITC International 1308.HKHong Kong$15.8B+34%+5%34%10.7×-0.4%+15.3%
Evergreen Marine Corp(taiwan) 2603.TWTaiwan$16.1B+28%-20%15%5.0×-9.1%+12.9%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 9101.TJapan$16.8B+17%0%6%9.0×7.8%+8.5%
COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation 600026.SSChina$13.2B-21%+38%33%6.1×-8.2%+7.8%
OOIL 0316.HKHong Kong$12.8B+10%-8%10%5.9×-2.3%+3.6%
China Merchants Energy Shipping 601872.SSChina$19.6B-8%+60%39%6.3×-9.5%+5.4%
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha 9107.TJapan$11.0B+17%+11%8%9.4×7.3%+10.2%
Ningbo Zhoushan Port 601018.SSChina$10.4B-4%+12%16%n/a-7.3%+7.6%
Hapag-Lloyd HLAG.DEGermany$25.1B+11%-9%2%18.5×34.4%+7.8%
Wan Hai Lines 2615.TWTaiwan$9.12B+40%-14%22%5.8×-12.0%+11.4%
Wallenius Wilhelmsen WAWI.OLNorway$7.58B+29%-11%25%10.4×-6.6%+21.0%
Kuehne & Nagel International KNIN.SWSwitzerland$34.3B+35%+1%5%25.4×3.2%+3.7%
Kirby KEXUnited States$6.39B-15%+8%14%14.6×6.2%+9.2%
Matson MATXUnited States$6.34B+16%0%14%10.9×11.8%+7.0%
COSCO SHIPPING 1919.HKHong Kong$38.5B+20%-5%13%6.0×-8.7%+4.3%
Yang Ming Marine Transport 2609.TWTaiwan$6.03B+14%-22%6%6.5×n/an/a
A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S MAERSK-A.CODenmark$47.6B+44%-8%5%5.9×-1.3%+6.6%
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers 600428.SSChina$4.40B+25%+37%19%8.9×-17.9%+27.0%
COSCO SHIPPING Development 601866.SSChina$3.87B-10%-3%13%3.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are HMM's main competitors?
Named competitors: A.P. Moller-Maersk (MAERSK-A.CO), COSCO SHIPPING Holdings (1919.HK), Evergreen Marine (2603.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Mitsui O.s.k. Lines (9104.T), SITC International (1308.HK), Evergreen Marine Corp(taiwan) (2603.TW), Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (9101.T), COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation (600026.SS), OOIL (0316.HK).
Is HMM expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.7× against a peer median of 7.3×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has HMM stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +7.6% against +16.5% for the median peer; over one year +7.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.