Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 601866.SS COSCO SHIPPING Development Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

COSCO SHIPPING Development Co., Ltd. Class A601866.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Financial-leasing and shipping-services arm of COSCO Shipping, leasing containers, vessels and offshore equipment.

≈ A Chinese Triton International/GATX hybrid (container and asset leasing)Momentum strong 71
Mkt cap
$3.87B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
25%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$25.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
3.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.5 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥2.39
1D-1.2%
1W-0.4%
1M-3.2%
3M-4.0%
6M-10.2%
YTD-5.2%
1Y-10.8%
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh26.5% off high

What COSCO SHIPPING Development does

Financial-leasing and shipping-services arm of COSCO Shipping, leasing containers, vessels and offshore equipment.

Earns rent by leasing out containers by the day and ships on multi-year charters or finance leases, with container leasing the larger part. Customers are mainly shipping lines, and COSCO Shipping group, a Chinese state shipping group, is the controlling owner.

In one line: A Chinese Triton International/GATX hybrid (container and asset leasing).

Products and services

  • Container leasing
  • Ship/vessel leasing
  • Financial leasing services

Customers

  • Shipping lines
  • Offshore/energy operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Marine transportation
  • Container/ship leasing & financial…

What could go right

  • Global trade/container leasing demand

What could go wrong

  • Container/shipping-rate cycles
  • Interest-rate/leverage exposure

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Large leased container/vessel fleet backed by COSCO group scale.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Employees: 16,581

Named competitors

COSCO SHIPPING Development at a glance

Size COSCO SHIPPING Development (601866.SS) is a China Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $3.87B, the 662nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥2.39 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 10.2%, against +11.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.5%); the operating margin is 12.8% (peer median 21.5%).

Valuation It trades at 3.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 9.0× (2nd cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.5 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 112601866.SS 89
Six months, rebased to 100: COSCO SHIPPING Development against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

COSCO SHIPPING Development financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥26.5BCN¥25.2BCN¥27.6BCN¥15.6BCN¥25.6B
Revenue growth—-9%+76%-39%—
Gross profitCN¥6.73BCN¥4.63BCN¥4.62BCN¥4.63BCN¥7.11B
EBITDAn/aCN¥6.51BCN¥6.24BCN¥5.99BCN¥7.97B
Net incomeCN¥1.73BCN¥1.61BCN¥1.69BCN¥1.41BCN¥3.92B
Free cash flow-CN¥11.8B-CN¥3.83B-CN¥2.67B-CN¥32.4MCN¥649M
Capital expenditureCN¥17.0BCN¥9.63BCN¥9.92BCN¥5.75BCN¥11.1B
Total debtCN¥107BCN¥93.5BCN¥88.2BCN¥90.1BCN¥92.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

COSCO SHIPPING Development competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%-20%-10%HAUTO600428ZIMSBLK000088601083DACCAPT60197525102609NMMMATXKEX2343GESHIP2637WAWI028670CKN601866.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. COSCO SHIPPING Development is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%5×10×15×HAUTO600428ZIMSBLK000088601083DAC60197525102609NMMMATXKEX2343GESHIP2637WAWICKN601866.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. COSCO SHIPPING Development is the large dot.

COSCO SHIPPING Development competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (601866.SS vs 601872.SS vs 000415.SZ vs GSL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
COSCO SHIPPING Development 601866.SS$3.87B-10%-3%13%3.8×n/a
China Merchants Energy Shipping 601872.SS$19.6B-8%+60%39%6.3×-9.5%
Bohai Leasing 000415.SZ$4.44B+2%-7%26%5.6×n/a
Global Ship Lease GSL$1.41B-8%+6%48%4.1×-15.2%
Danaos DAC$2.70B+10%+2%48%5.3×-8.7%
Costamare CMRE$1.54B-28%-42%44%5.2×-6.9%

How COSCO SHIPPING Development compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

COSCO SHIPPING Development against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure601866.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.2%-8.2%5th highest of 21
6-month return-10.2%+11.9%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-26.5%-15.7%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-3.0%+8.5%7th lowest of 20
Operating margin12.8%21.5%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E3.8×9.0×2nd cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.5 pp+1.8 pp6th lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA13.2×0.9×most indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
COSCO SHIPPING Development 601866.SSChina$3.87B-10%-3%13%3.8×n/an/a
Hoegh Autoliners HAUTO.OLNorway$3.64B+20%-4%30%9.6×-0.1%+16.4%
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers 600428.SSChina$4.40B+25%+37%19%8.9×-17.9%+27.0%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services ZIMUnited States$3.37B+5%-25%6%3.7×2.7%+11.6%
Star Bulk Carriers SBLKUnited States$2.99B0%+6%28%5.7×-0.1%+8.5%
Shenzhen Yan Tian Port 000088.SZChina$2.97B+2%+19%12%16.5×21.8%+10.1%
Shanghai Jinjiang Shipping (Group) 601083.SSChina$2.75B+17%+11%24%11.3×-18.7%+15.2%
Danaos DACUnited States$2.70B+10%+2%48%5.3×-8.7%+17.7%
Capital Tankers CAPT.OLNorway$2.57B+45%n/a37%7.3×n/an/a
Nanjing Tanker 601975.SSChina$2.50B-21%+12%26%9.0×-8.4%+7.6%
T.S. Lines 2510.HKHong Kong$2.48B+38%-4%19%5.8×-6.9%+9.8%
Yang Ming Marine Transport 2609.TWTaiwan$6.03B+14%-22%6%6.5×n/an/a
Navios Maritime Partners LP NMMUnited States$2.42B+14%+19%39%3.9×n/an/a
Matson MATXUnited States$6.34B+16%0%14%10.9×11.8%+7.0%
Kirby KEXUnited States$6.39B-15%+8%14%14.6×6.2%+9.2%
Pacific Basin Shipping 2343.HKHong Kong$2.22B+6%-6%6%9.0×7.9%+7.3%
Great Eastern Shipping GESHIP.NSIndia$2.16B-8%+24%42%5.1×8.2%+10.1%
Wisdom Marine Lines 2637.TWTaiwan$2.13B+28%+10%33%9.1×-1.8%+7.2%
Wallenius Wilhelmsen WAWI.OLNorway$7.58B+29%-11%25%10.4×-6.6%+21.0%
PanOcean 028670.KSSouth Korea$1.91B-12%+24%9%5.0×n/an/a
Clarkson CKN.LUnited Kingdom$1.90B-5%+15%14%13.9×5.2%+12.0%

Questions

Who are COSCO SHIPPING Development's main competitors?
Named competitors: Triton International (private or unlisted), China Merchants Energy Shipping (601872.SS), Bohai Leasing (000415.SZ), Global Ship Lease (GSL), Danaos (DAC), Costamare (CMRE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hoegh Autoliners (HAUTO.OL), COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (600428.SS), ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), Shenzhen Yan Tian Port (000088.SZ), Shanghai Jinjiang Shipping (Group) (601083.SS).
Is COSCO SHIPPING Development expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 3.8× against a peer median of 9.0×, 2nd cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has COSCO SHIPPING Development stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -10.2% against +11.9% for the median peer; over one year -10.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.