Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.ZIMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Israeli container shipping line operating global and niche trade routes, chartering most of its vessel fleet.

≈ A smaller, niche-focused MaerskMomentum strong 65
Mkt cap
$3.37B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$33.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
3.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.7 pp
WACC 7.5%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · USD$27.95
1D+1.9%
1W-1.5%
1M-7.6%
3M+10.9%
6M+5.0%
YTD+31.6%
1Y+85.0%
ATR %3.0%
Beta0.84
52w lowhigh9.8% off high

What ZIM Integrated Shipping Services does

Israeli container shipping line operating global and niche trade routes, chartering most of its vessel fleet.

Earns freight on containers it carries, mostly on routes it runs itself such as across the Pacific to the US, while hiring most of its ships rather than owning them, so costs are fixed for the charter period while rates change daily. The Israeli state keeps a special golden share with a veto over some changes of control.

In one line: A smaller, niche-focused Maersk.

Products and services

  • Container liner shipping
  • Niche trade lane services
  • Logistics/freight forwarding

Customers

  • Global importers/exporters
  • Freight forwarders
  • Retailers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Shipping & logistics
  • Container shipping
  • Global/niche container trade routes

What could go right

  • Global trade volume growth
  • Freight-rate spikes from supply disruptions

What could go wrong

  • Container freight-rate cyclicality/volatility
  • Global trade slowdown risk

Moat: none (scale). Smaller than global container majors and relies heavily on chartered-in vessels, limiting cost control.

Headquarters: Haifa, Israel · Founded: 1945 · Employees: 6,785

Named competitors

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services at a glance

Size ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) is a United States Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $3.37B, the 1468th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $27.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.0%, against +5.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 24.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.3%); the operating margin is 5.7% (peer median 21.5%).

Valuation It trades at 3.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 8.0× (2nd cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.7 points below its cost of capital (7.5% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 2.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ZIM 106Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$6.44B$6.90B$8.43B$5.16B$12.6B
Revenue growth—-18%+63%-59%—
Gross profit$706M$1.16B$2.77B-$195M$6.40B
EBITDA$1.65B$2.13B$3.63B$1.01B$7.48B
Net income$139M$479M$2.15B-$2.70B$4.62B
Free cash flow$1.16B$1.61B$3.07B$524M$5.54B
Capital expenditure$172M$218M$214M$116M$346M
Total debt$5.31B$5.74B$6.03B$5.01B$4.35B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%HAUTOSBLK0000882866601083DAC600428CAPT6019752510NMM2343GESHIP2637028670CKN260993033877SNIZIM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%5×10×15×HAUTOSBLK0000882866601083DAC6004286019752510NMM2343GESHIP2637CKN260993033877ZIMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%HAUTOSBLK000088601083DAC60042860197525102343GESHIP263793033877ZIMGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is the large dot.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ZIM vs MAERSK-A.CO vs HLAG.DE vs 1919.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services ZIM$3.37B+5%-25%6%3.7×2.7%
A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S MAERSK-A.CO$47.6B+44%-8%5%5.9×-1.3%
Hapag-Lloyd HLAG.DE$25.1B+11%-9%2%18.5×34.4%
COSCO SHIPPING 1919.HK$38.5B+20%-5%13%6.0×-8.7%

How ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureZIMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.6%-8.0%11th highest of 21
6-month return+5.0%+5.2%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-9.8%-16.2%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-24.9%+6.3%lowest of 20
Operating margin5.7%21.5%lowest of 21
Forward P/E3.7×8.0×2nd cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.7%-1.8%6th most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.6%+10.1%7th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.9 pp-14.0 pp7th most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.7 pp+0.7 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA4.3×6.8×3rd cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA2.2×1.3×6th most indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services ZIMUnited States$3.37B+5%-25%6%3.7×2.7%+11.6%
Hoegh Autoliners HAUTO.OLNorway$3.64B+20%-4%30%9.6×-0.1%+16.4%
Star Bulk Carriers SBLKUnited States$2.99B0%+6%28%5.7×-0.1%+8.5%
Shenzhen Yan Tian Port 000088.SZChina$2.97B+2%+19%12%16.5×21.8%+10.1%
COSCO SHIPPING Development 2866.HKHong Kong$3.84B-22%-2%13%3.6×n/an/a
Shanghai Jinjiang Shipping (Group) 601083.SSChina$2.75B+17%+11%24%11.3×-18.7%+15.2%
Danaos DACUnited States$2.70B+10%+2%48%5.3×-8.7%+17.7%
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers 600428.SSChina$4.40B+25%+37%19%8.9×-17.9%+27.0%
Capital Tankers CAPT.OLNorway$2.57B+45%n/a37%7.3×n/an/a
Nanjing Tanker 601975.SSChina$2.50B-21%+12%26%9.0×-8.4%+7.6%
T.S. Lines 2510.HKHong Kong$2.48B+38%-4%19%5.8×-6.9%+9.8%
Navios Maritime Partners LP NMMUnited States$2.42B+14%+19%39%3.9×n/an/a
Pacific Basin Shipping 2343.HKHong Kong$2.22B+6%-6%6%9.0×7.9%+7.3%
Great Eastern Shipping GESHIP.NSIndia$2.16B-8%+24%42%5.1×8.2%+10.1%
Wisdom Marine Lines 2637.TWTaiwan$2.13B+28%+10%33%9.1×-1.8%+7.2%
PanOcean 028670.KSSouth Korea$1.91B-12%+24%9%5.0×n/an/a
Clarkson CKN.LUnited Kingdom$1.90B-5%+15%14%13.9×5.2%+12.0%
Yang Ming Marine Transport 2609.TWTaiwan$6.03B+14%-22%6%6.5×n/an/a
Sumitomo Warehouse 9303.TJapan$1.87B+4%+2%6%16.3×11.3%+0.4%
CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping 3877.HKHong Kong$1.85B-4%-10%60%7.2×-3.2%+14.9%
Stolt-Nielsen SNI.OLNorway$1.82B+4%-5%11%8.8×-4.5%+9.5%

Questions

Who are ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's main competitors?
Named competitors: A.P. Moller-Maersk (MAERSK-A.CO), Hapag-Lloyd (HLAG.DE), COSCO Shipping (1919.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hoegh Autoliners (HAUTO.OL), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), Shenzhen Yan Tian Port (000088.SZ), COSCO SHIPPING Development (2866.HK), Shanghai Jinjiang Shipping (Group) (601083.SS), Danaos (DAC).
Is ZIM Integrated Shipping Services expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 3.7× against a peer median of 8.0×, 2nd cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has ZIM Integrated Shipping Services stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.0% against +5.2% for the median peer; over one year +85.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.