Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Global Ship Lease, Inc. Class AGSLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Owner of a fleet of mid-size and smaller containerships chartered to major container liner companies.

≈ A mid-size containership leasing companyMomentum weak 36
Mkt cap
$1.41B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
89%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.0 pp
WACC 8.4%
Hurdle
-37 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · USD$39.03
1D+0.9%
1W-6.5%
1M-14.2%
3M-6.8%
6M-7.7%
YTD+11.4%
1Y+22.7%
ATR %2.9%
Beta0.79
52w lowhigh16.2% off high

What Global Ship Lease does

Owner of a fleet of mid-size and smaller containerships chartered to major container liner companies.

Collects a fixed daily hire for leasing ships to liner companies, who run the voyages and pay for fuel, so revenue is largely locked in by contract and the key moment is re-chartering a ship when its contract ends. The company dates from 2008 around vessels bought from CMA CGM, still its largest charterer, and has since expanded the fleet.

In one line: A mid-size containership leasing company.

Products and services

  • Containership chartering (mid-size/feeder)
  • Long-term time charters

Customers

  • Major container liner operators (CMA CGM, Maersk)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Shipping
  • Container ship leasing
  • Mid-size vessel chartering

What could go right

  • Long-term charter rate strength
  • Niche/mid-size vessel demand

What could go wrong

  • Charter-rate cyclicality at renewal
  • Customer concentration (CMA CGM)

Moat: narrow (scale, switching costs). Fleet of mid-size vessels well-suited to niche trade routes, chartered under long-term contracts.

Headquarters: London, United Kingdom · Founded: 2008 · Employees: 7

Named competitors

Global Ship Lease at a glance

Size Global Ship Lease (GSL) is a United States Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $1.41B, the 2039th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $39.03 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.7%, against +0.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.1%); the operating margin is 48.5% (peer median 13.5%).

Valuation It trades at 4.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 9.6× (cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +22%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.0 points above its cost of capital (8.4% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 1.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 99GSL 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Global Ship Lease against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Global Ship Lease financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$780M$766M$711M$675M$646M
Revenue growth—+8%+5%+5%—
Gross profit$408M$411M$396M$380M$376M
EBITDA$508M$511M$479M$454M$439M
Net income$383M$416M$354M$304M$293M
Free cash flow$291M$359M$188M$223M$318M
Capital expenditure$222M$169M$242M$152M$33.7M
Total debt$672M$689M$684M$812M$934M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Global Ship Lease competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%SOMADNORDDFDS9302CMRE600017MPCC9110CCEC26062020DIS3877CKNGSL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Global Ship Lease is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×50×100×150×SOMADNORDDFDSCMRE2020GSLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Global Ship Lease is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%SOMADFDS9302CMREMPCC91102020DIS38779303CKNGSLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Global Ship Lease is the large dot.

Global Ship Lease competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GSL vs CMRE vs DAC vs NMM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Global Ship Lease GSL$1.41B-8%+6%48%4.1×-15.2%
Costamare CMRE$1.54B-28%-42%44%5.2×-6.9%
Danaos DAC$2.70B+10%+2%48%5.3×-8.7%
Navios Maritime Partners LP NMM$2.42B+14%+19%39%3.9×n/a
Euroseas ESEA$417M-13%+3%59%3.4×n/a

How Global Ship Lease compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Global Ship Lease against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGSLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.2%-5.4%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-7.7%+0.3%3rd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-16.2%-15.1%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.5%+5.1%10th highest of 20
Operating margin48.5%13.5%4th highest of 20
Forward P/E4.1×9.6×cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-15.2%-3.2%least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+22.1%+12.0%3rd highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-37.2 pp-14.0 pp2nd least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.0 pp+0.1 pp4th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA3.0×6.2×cheapest of 18
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×1.5×6th least indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Global Ship Lease GSLUnited States$1.41B-8%+6%48%4.1×-15.2%+22.1%
Solstad Maritime SOMA.OLNorway$1.36B-6%+17%40%5.5×-2.5%+22.7%
Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S DNORD.CODenmark$1.46B+15%+7%3%9.6×n/an/a
Dfds A/s DFDS.CODenmark$1.33B+8%+3%3%17.0×4.6%+17.2%
MITSUI-SOKO 9302.TJapan$1.52B-22%+6%7%17.8×-1.6%+3.4%
Costamare CMREUnited States$1.54B-28%-42%44%5.2×-6.9%+13.0%
Rizhao Port 600017.SSChina$1.26B-7%+3%13%17.1×n/an/a
MPC Container Ships MPCC.OLNorway$1.26B0%-15%37%7.8×-13.3%+27.1%
NS United Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd 9110.TJapan$1.58B+39%+11%11%n/a-5.0%+10.7%
Ningbo Ocean Shipping 601022.SSChina$1.58B-7%+13%11%n/an/an/a
Capital Clean Energy Carriers CCECUnited States$1.24B+3%+5%50%8.1×n/an/a
Volare Shipping VLCC.OLNorway$1.17Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
U-Ming Marine Transport 2606.TWTaiwan$1.70B+6%+13%29%8.7×-3.8%+12.8%
Genco Shipping & Trading GNKUnited States$1.13B0%+26%17%10.2×n/an/a
2020 Bulkers 2020.OLNorway$1.10B+20%+256%92%170.2×9.2%+7.3%
d'Amico International Shipping DIS.MIItaly$1.09B-3%-15%36%8.0×-7.3%+2.3%
Stolt-Nielsen SNI.OLNorway$1.82B+4%-5%11%8.8×-4.5%+9.5%
CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping 3877.HKHong Kong$1.85B-4%-10%60%7.2×-3.2%+14.9%
Sumitomo Warehouse 9303.TJapan$1.87B+4%+2%6%16.3×11.3%+0.4%
Clarkson CKN.LUnited Kingdom$1.90B-5%+15%14%13.9×5.2%+12.0%
Iino Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd 9119.TJapan$1.04B-6%+1%11%11.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Global Ship Lease's main competitors?
Named competitors: Costamare (CMRE), Danaos Corporation (DAC), Navios Maritime Partners (NMM), Euroseas (ESEA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Solstad Maritime (SOMA.OL), Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S (DNORD.CO), Dfds A/s (DFDS.CO), MITSUI-SOKO (9302.T), Costamare (CMRE), Rizhao Port (600017.SS).
Is Global Ship Lease expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.1× against a peer median of 9.6×, cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +22%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Global Ship Lease stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.7% against +0.3% for the median peer; over one year +22.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.