Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2606.TW U-Ming Marine Transport Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

U-Ming Marine Transport Corp.2606.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Dry-bulk and cement-carrier shipping company affiliated with the Formosa Plastics Group.

Momentum strong 78
Mkt cap
$1.70B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.02M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.0 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$66.50
1D-4.2%
1W-12.5%
1M-10.5%
3M+4.9%
6M+5.9%
YTD+10.1%
1Y+17.9%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh18.6% off high

What U-Ming Marine Transport does

Dry-bulk and cement-carrier shipping company affiliated with the Formosa Plastics Group.

Earns freight and charter hire for moving bulk cargo by sea. A base of long-term contracts carries raw materials for Formosa Plastics Group companies, while other capacity is chartered in the open dry-bulk market, where rates swing with global trade.

Products and services

  • Bulk carrier chartering
  • Cement carrier operations
  • Raw-material transport for Formosa Group

Customers

  • Formosa Plastics Group affiliates
  • Commodity traders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Shipping
  • Industrial/dry-bulk transport
  • Bulk carriers

What could go right

  • Formosa Group raw-material shipping volumes

What could go wrong

  • Freight rate cyclicality
  • Parent-group demand dependence

Moat: narrow (switching costs, installed base). Long-term contracts of affreightment carrying raw materials for its Formosa Group parent smooth volume.

Headquarters: Taipei, Taiwan

Named competitors

U-Ming Marine Transport at a glance

Size U-Ming Marine Transport (2606.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $1.70B, the 188th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$66.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.9%, against -1.8% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 13.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.9%); the operating margin is 29.4% (peer median 13.2%).

Valuation It trades at 8.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 8.4× (10th cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.0 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262606.TW 104Peer median 99
Six months, rebased to 100: U-Ming Marine Transport against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

U-Ming Marine Transport financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$17.4BNT$15.6BNT$16.3BNT$14.4BNT$14.2B
Revenue growth—-5%+14%+1%—
Gross profitNT$6.00BNT$4.45BNT$5.19BNT$3.35BNT$5.02B
EBITDANT$8.82BNT$7.43BNT$8.03BNT$5.98BNT$6.76B
Net incomeNT$5.73BNT$3.64BNT$4.68BNT$2.74BNT$4.40B
Free cash flowNT$6.99BNT$1.21BNT$3.37B-NT$2.62B-NT$4.35B
Capital expenditureNT$865MNT$5.94BNT$4.54BNT$8.05BNT$10.8B
Total debtNT$46.6BNT$46.6BNT$45.4BNT$44.8BNT$41.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

U-Ming Marine Transport competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%SNI601022911038779303CMRE9302CKN028670DNORDGSLSOMA2637GESHIPDFDS2343600017MPCCCCECNMM2606.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. U-Ming Marine Transport is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%5×10×15×SNI38779303CMRE9302CKN028670DNORDGSLSOMA2637GESHIPDFDS2343MPCCCCECNMM2606.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. U-Ming Marine Transport is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%SNI911038779303CMRE9302CKNGSLSOMAGESHIPDFDS2343MPCC2606.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. U-Ming Marine Transport is the large dot.

U-Ming Marine Transport competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2606.TW vs 2637.TW vs SBLK vs GNK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
U-Ming Marine Transport 2606.TW$1.70B+6%+13%29%8.7×-3.8%
Wisdom Marine Lines 2637.TW$2.13B+28%+10%33%9.1×-1.8%
Star Bulk Carriers SBLK$2.99B0%+6%28%5.7×-0.1%
Genco Shipping & Trading GNK$1.13B0%+26%17%10.2×n/a

How U-Ming Marine Transport compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

U-Ming Marine Transport against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2606.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.5%-6.6%8th lowest of 21
6-month return+5.9%-1.8%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-18.6%-16.0%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+13.2%+5.9%6th highest of 21
Operating margin29.4%13.2%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.7×8.4×10th cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-3.8%-2.1%6th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.8%+11.3%7th highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-16.7 pp-13.3 pp6th least demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.0 pp+0.4 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.5×5.6×7th most expensive of 18
Net debt / EBITDA2.1×1.3×7th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
U-Ming Marine Transport 2606.TWTaiwan$1.70B+6%+13%29%8.7×-3.8%+12.8%
Stolt-Nielsen SNI.OLNorway$1.82B+4%-5%11%8.8×-4.5%+9.5%
Ningbo Ocean Shipping 601022.SSChina$1.58B-7%+13%11%n/an/an/a
NS United Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd 9110.TJapan$1.58B+39%+11%11%n/a-5.0%+10.7%
CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping 3877.HKHong Kong$1.85B-4%-10%60%7.2×-3.2%+14.9%
Sumitomo Warehouse 9303.TJapan$1.87B+4%+2%6%16.3×11.3%+0.4%
Costamare CMREUnited States$1.54B-28%-42%44%5.2×-6.9%+13.0%
MITSUI-SOKO 9302.TJapan$1.52B-22%+6%7%17.8×-1.6%+3.4%
Clarkson CKN.LUnited Kingdom$1.90B-5%+15%14%13.9×5.2%+12.0%
PanOcean 028670.KSSouth Korea$1.91B-12%+24%9%5.0×n/an/a
Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S DNORD.CODenmark$1.46B+15%+7%3%9.6×n/an/a
Global Ship Lease GSLUnited States$1.41B-8%+6%48%4.1×-15.2%+22.1%
Solstad Maritime SOMA.OLNorway$1.36B-6%+17%40%5.5×-2.5%+22.7%
Wisdom Marine Lines 2637.TWTaiwan$2.13B+28%+10%33%9.1×-1.8%+7.2%
Great Eastern Shipping GESHIP.NSIndia$2.16B-8%+24%42%5.1×8.2%+10.1%
Dfds A/s DFDS.CODenmark$1.33B+8%+3%3%17.0×4.6%+17.2%
Pacific Basin Shipping 2343.HKHong Kong$2.22B+6%-6%6%9.0×7.9%+7.3%
Rizhao Port 600017.SSChina$1.26B-7%+3%13%17.1×n/an/a
MPC Container Ships MPCC.OLNorway$1.26B0%-15%37%7.8×-13.3%+27.1%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers CCECUnited States$1.24B+3%+5%50%8.1×n/an/a
Navios Maritime Partners LP NMMUnited States$2.42B+14%+19%39%3.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are U-Ming Marine Transport's main competitors?
Named competitors: Wisdom Marine Lines (2637.TW), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Stolt-Nielsen (SNI.OL), Ningbo Ocean Shipping (601022.SS), NS United Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd (9110.T), CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping (3877.HK), Sumitomo Warehouse (9303.T), Costamare (CMRE).
Is U-Ming Marine Transport expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.7× against a peer median of 8.4×, 10th cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has U-Ming Marine Transport stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.9% against -1.8% for the median peer; over one year +17.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.