Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9302.T MITSUI-SOKO HOLDINGS Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

MITSUI-SOKO HOLDINGS Co., Ltd.9302.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Japanese logistics group providing warehousing, freight forwarding and moving services domestically and overseas.

≈ A mid-size Japanese logistics/warehousing operatorMomentum weak 21
Mkt cap
$1.52B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.98M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.3 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥3,081
1D-4.2%
1W-4.5%
1M-5.9%
3M-12.7%
6M-21.6%
YTD-17.4%
1Y-24.2%
ATR %1.9%
52w lowhigh28.7% off high

What MITSUI-SOKO does

Japanese logistics group providing warehousing, freight forwarding and moving services domestically and overseas.

In one line: A mid-size Japanese logistics/warehousing operator.

Products and services

  • Warehousing services
  • Freight forwarding
  • Household/office moving services

Customers

  • Manufacturers/importers needing storage
  • Trading companies
  • Households/businesses relocating

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Logistics/warehousing
  • Warehousing, freight forwarding, moving…

What could go right

  • E-commerce/import logistics growth

What could go wrong

  • Trade volume cyclicality
  • Logistics price competition

Moat: none (installed base). Owned warehouse network is an asset base, but the logistics market is fragmented and price competitive.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1909 · Employees: 7,654

Named competitors

MITSUI-SOKO at a glance

Size MITSUI-SOKO (9302.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $1.52B, the 569th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,081 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.6%, against +0.3% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is 7.0% (peer median 16.5%).

Valuation It trades at 17.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 8.7× (2nd most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.3 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 999302.T 79
Six months, rebased to 100: MITSUI-SOKO against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

MITSUI-SOKO financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥307B¥299B¥281B¥261B¥301B
Revenue growth—+7%+8%-13%—
Gross profit¥43.2B¥43.3B¥37.6B¥38.5B¥42.9B
EBITDA¥33.3B¥33.8B¥28.7B¥30.6B¥35.8B
Net income¥11.6B¥11.2B¥10.0B¥12.1B¥15.6B
Free cash flow¥13.0B¥13.8B¥10.5B¥15.2B¥29.8B
Capital expenditure¥12.2B¥11.6B¥13.8B¥11.5B¥5.75B
Total debt¥83.2B¥85.7B¥87.6B¥83.3B¥92.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MITSUI-SOKO competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%CMRE9110601022DNORDGSL2606SOMADFDSSNIMPCC3877CCECCKN028670GNK20209302.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MITSUI-SOKO is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×50×100×150×CMREDNORDGSLDFDS930320209302.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MITSUI-SOKO is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%CMRE9110GSLSOMADFDSMPCC38779303CKN2020DIS9302.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MITSUI-SOKO is the large dot.

MITSUI-SOKO competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9302.T vs 9303.T vs 9147.T vs 9064.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MITSUI-SOKO 9302.T$1.52B-22%+6%7%17.8×-1.6%
Sumitomo Warehouse 9303.T$1.87B+4%+2%6%16.3×11.3%
Nippon Express Hldgs 9147.T$8.22B+35%+2%3%17.6×7.9%
Yamato 9064.T$4.83B+26%+2%2%34.5×8.9%

How MITSUI-SOKO compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MITSUI-SOKO against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9302.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.9%-5.7%11th highest of 21
6-month return-21.6%+0.3%2nd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-28.7%-15.1%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.2%+5.5%10th highest of 20
Operating margin7.0%16.5%4th lowest of 20
Forward P/E17.8×8.7×2nd most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.6%-3.8%5th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.4%+12.8%3rd lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.0 pp-15.6 pp3rd most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.3 pp+1.1 pp9th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA8.8×5.6×5th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA1.3×1.4×7th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MITSUI-SOKO 9302.TJapan$1.52B-22%+6%7%17.8×-1.6%+3.4%
Costamare CMREUnited States$1.54B-28%-42%44%5.2×-6.9%+13.0%
NS United Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd 9110.TJapan$1.58B+39%+11%11%n/a-5.0%+10.7%
Ningbo Ocean Shipping 601022.SSChina$1.58B-7%+13%11%n/an/an/a
Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S DNORD.CODenmark$1.46B+15%+7%3%9.6×n/an/a
Global Ship Lease GSLUnited States$1.41B-8%+6%48%4.1×-15.2%+22.1%
U-Ming Marine Transport 2606.TWTaiwan$1.70B+6%+13%29%8.7×-3.8%+12.8%
Solstad Maritime SOMA.OLNorway$1.36B-6%+17%40%5.5×-2.5%+22.7%
Dfds A/s DFDS.CODenmark$1.33B+8%+3%3%17.0×4.6%+17.2%
Stolt-Nielsen SNI.OLNorway$1.82B+4%-5%11%8.8×-4.5%+9.5%
Rizhao Port 600017.SSChina$1.26B-7%+3%13%17.1×n/an/a
MPC Container Ships MPCC.OLNorway$1.26B0%-15%37%7.8×-13.3%+27.1%
CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping 3877.HKHong Kong$1.85B-4%-10%60%7.2×-3.2%+14.9%
Sumitomo Warehouse 9303.TJapan$1.87B+4%+2%6%16.3×11.3%+0.4%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers CCECUnited States$1.24B+3%+5%50%8.1×n/an/a
Clarkson CKN.LUnited Kingdom$1.90B-5%+15%14%13.9×5.2%+12.0%
PanOcean 028670.KSSouth Korea$1.91B-12%+24%9%5.0×n/an/a
Volare Shipping VLCC.OLNorway$1.17Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Genco Shipping & Trading GNKUnited States$1.13B0%+26%17%10.2×n/an/a
2020 Bulkers 2020.OLNorway$1.10B+20%+256%92%170.2×9.2%+7.3%
d'Amico International Shipping DIS.MIItaly$1.09B-3%-15%36%8.0×-7.3%+2.3%

Questions

Who are MITSUI-SOKO's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sumitomo Warehouse (9303.T), Nippon Express (9147.T), Yamato Holdings (9064.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Costamare (CMRE), NS United Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd (9110.T), Ningbo Ocean Shipping (601022.SS), Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S (DNORD.CO), Global Ship Lease (GSL), U-Ming Marine Transport (2606.TW).
Is MITSUI-SOKO expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.8× against a peer median of 8.7×, 2nd most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has MITSUI-SOKO stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.6% against +0.3% for the median peer; over one year -24.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.