Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.ATD.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Consumer Discretionary›Specialty Stores

Global convenience store and fuel retailer operating Circle K and other brands across North America, Europe and Asia.

≈ Canada's answer to 7-Eleven.Momentum neutral 53
Mkt cap
$54.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$78.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.2 pp
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
-11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
18 days
24 Nov 2026
Close · CADC$83.20
1D-0.5%
1W+2.7%
1M+7.9%
3M-10.8%
6M+5.3%
YTD+11.0%
1Y+18.4%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh12.6% off high

What Alimentation Couche-Tard does

Global convenience store and fuel retailer operating Circle K and other brands across North America, Europe and Asia.

Earns a thin margin on each litre of fuel sold and more on in-store food, drinks and tobacco, so forecourt traffic matters. It grew mainly by buying other chains, including CST Brands in 2017 and Topaz in 2020, and in 2024-25 bid for Japan's Seven & i, owner of 7-Eleven, before withdrawing. The founders keep influence through shares with extra votes.

In one line: Canada's answer to 7-Eleven..

Products and services

  • Convenience store merchandise (food, beverages)
  • Motor fuel retail
  • Circle K branded stores

Customers

  • Everyday commuters/consumers
  • Motorists

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Retail
  • Convenience stores & fuel retail
  • Store operations

What could go right

  • Store network growth via acquisitions
  • Fuel margin and merchandise mix improvement

What could go wrong

  • Fuel demand decline from EV adoption long-term
  • Integration risk from large acquisitions

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, brand). Massive store count and fuel-purchasing scale drive procurement cost advantages small operators can't match.

Headquarters: Laval, Canada · Founded: 1980 · Employees: 145,000

Named competitors

Alimentation Couche-Tard at a glance

Size Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.TO) is a Canada Consumer Discretionary company (Specialty Stores) with a market value of $54.5B, the 22nd largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$83.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.3%, against +19.6% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 10 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.9%); the operating margin is 5.9% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 18.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (3rd cheapest of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.2 points above its cost of capital (6.7% WACC).

Credit Alimentation Couche-Tard has 7 bonds outstanding ($5.19B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 113 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 24 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 121ATD.TO 105
Six months, rebased to 100: Alimentation Couche-Tard against the median of its 9 peers (local-currency closes).

Alimentation Couche-Tard financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2026-04-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$112BC$106BC$102BC$93.5BC$95.5B
Revenue growth—+4%+9%-2%—
Gross profitC$17.1BC$16.6BC$15.2BC$13.9BC$14.0B
EBITDAC$9.89BC$9.64BC$8.22BC$7.55BC$7.58B
Net incomeC$4.42BC$4.34BC$3.60BC$3.69BC$4.11B
Free cash flowC$5.11BC$4.65BC$3.78BC$3.88BC$3.38B
Capital expenditureC$2.64BC$2.75BC$3.24BC$2.62BC$2.40B
Total debtC$21.6BC$22.4BC$19.3BC$20.2BC$12.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Alimentation Couche-Tard competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%+5%+10%+15%AZOORLYCVNAWSMULTATSCOWPAGBJATD.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Alimentation Couche-Tard is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×30×AZOORLYCVNAWSMULTATSCOWPAGBJATD.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Alimentation Couche-Tard is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%AZOORLYCVNAWSMULTATSCOWPAGBJATD.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Alimentation Couche-Tard is the large dot.

Alimentation Couche-Tard competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ATD.TO vs 3382.T vs CASY vs MUSA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Alimentation Couche-Tard ATD.TO$54.5B+5%+12%6%18.3×1.3%
Seven & I 3382.T$31.7B+16%-11%4%17.4×4.0%
Casey's CASY$25.4B-20%+14%6%32.3×11.1%
Murphy USA MUSA$9.45B-10%+20%4%17.5×-9.4%

How Alimentation Couche-Tard compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Alimentation Couche-Tard against its 9 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureATD.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.9%+8.6%5th lowest of 10
6-month return+5.3%+19.6%4th lowest of 10
Distance from 52-week high-12.6%-12.3%5th lowest of 10
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.6%+7.9%2nd highest of 10
Operating margin5.9%8.8%4th lowest of 10
Forward P/E18.3×22.4×3rd cheapest of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)1.3%7.1%3rd least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.0%+7.9%3rd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-10.7 pp-3.8 ppleast demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.2 pp+12.7 pp4th lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA9.5×15.3×cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×2.4×4th least indebted of 10
Bond spread113 bp83 bp3rd widest of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Alimentation Couche-Tard ATD.TOCanada$54.5B+5%+12%6%18.3×1.3%+12.0%
AutoZone AZOUnited States$51.8B-8%+7%18%19.0×-2.8%+6.8%
O’Reilly Automotive ORLYUnited States$72.3B-3%+9%20%25.2×4.1%+8.9%
Carvana CVNAUnited States$81.2B-6%+50%9%35.9×43.6%+29.5%
Williams-Sonoma WSMUnited States$29.9B+40%+2%19%25.6×15.4%+2.9%
Ulta Beauty ULTAUnited States$27.6B+24%+11%13%21.1×7.1%+15.0%
Tractor Supply TSCOUnited States$18.9B+20%+4%9%18.0×4.1%+7.9%
Wayfair WUnited States$15.3B+69%+8%2%29.6×47.7%-2.5%
Penske Automotive PAGUnited States$13.9B+22%+6%3%15.2×12.6%+9.2%
BJ's Wholesale Club BJUnited States$13.8B+18%+9%4%22.4×-0.7%+6.8%

Alimentation Couche-Tard bonds and credit

Alimentation Couche-Tard has 7 bonds outstanding with $5.19B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 4.97%, a spread of 113 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Alimentation Couche-Tard's main competitors?
Named competitors: Seven & I Holdings (7-Eleven) (3382.T), Casey's General Stores (CASY), Murphy USA (MUSA), EG Group (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes AutoZone (AZO), O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY), Carvana (CVNA), Williams-Sonoma (WSM), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), Tractor Supply (TSCO).
Is Alimentation Couche-Tard expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.3× against a peer median of 22.4×, 3rd cheapest of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Alimentation Couche-Tard stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.3% against +19.6% for the median peer; over one year +18.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.