Loading…

AutoZoneAZOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Specialty Stores

Operates a large chain of auto-parts retail stores selling to DIY consumers and commercial repair shops.

Momentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$51.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$532M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+21.3 pp
WACC 6.5%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
32 days
8 Dec 2026
Close · USD$3,216
1D-2.8%
1W+1.5%
1M+10.5%
3M+4.8%
6M-8.0%
YTD-5.2%
1Y-12.2%
ATR %2.8%
Beta0.23
52w lowhigh19.5% off high

What AutoZone does

Operates a large chain of auto-parts retail stores selling to DIY consumers and commercial repair shops.

Sells parts to do-it-yourself owners and delivers to professional repair shops from hub stores that stock deep inventories. Duralast private-label parts earn better profit than third-party brands. The professional side is its growth push, and stores in Mexico and Brazil extend it beyond the US.

Products and services

  • Retail auto parts (DIY)
  • Commercial parts delivery to repair shops
  • Duralast private-label parts

Customers

  • DIY vehicle owners
  • Independent repair shops and fleets

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Auto parts retail
  • Automotive aftermarket parts

What could go right

  • Aging US vehicle fleet needing more repairs
  • Commercial segment growth

What could go wrong

  • EV adoption reducing parts-replacement needs long-term
  • Consumer discretionary/DIY demand cyclicality

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, brand). Extensive store/hub network and strong private-label parts brand give scale and delivery-speed advantages.

Headquarters: Memphis, Tennessee, United States · Founded: 1979 · Employees: 132,000

Named competitors

AutoZone at a glance

Size AutoZone (AZO) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Specialty Stores) with a market value of $51.8B, the 245th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $3,216 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.0%, against +19.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 10 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.7%); the operating margin is 17.8% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 19.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (4th cheapest of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 21.3 points above its cost of capital (6.5% WACC).

Credit AutoZone has 14 bonds outstanding ($8.10B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 74 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 121AZO 94
Six months, rebased to 100: AutoZone against the median of its 9 peers (local-currency closes).

AutoZone financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-08-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$20.3B$20.3B$18.9B$18.5B$17.5B
Revenue growth—+7%+2%+6%—
Gross profit$10.4B$9.95B$9.97B$9.82B$9.07B
EBITDA$4.31B$4.31B$4.22B$4.34B$3.97B
Net income$2.57B$2.57B$2.50B$2.66B$2.53B
Free cash flow$1.82B$1.82B$1.79B$1.93B$2.14B
Capital expenditure$1.43B$1.43B$1.33B$1.07B$797M
Total debt$13.2B$13.2B$12.6B$12.7B$11.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

AutoZone competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%+5%+10%+15%ATDORLYCVNAWSMULTATSCOWPAGBJAZO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. AutoZone is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×30×ATDORLYCVNAWSMULTATSCOWPAGBJAZORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. AutoZone is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%ATDORLYCVNAWSMULTAWPAGBJAZOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. AutoZone is the large dot.

AutoZone competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AZO vs ORLY vs AAP vs GPC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
AutoZone AZO$51.8B-8%+7%18%19.0×-2.8%
O’Reilly Automotive ORLY$72.3B-3%+9%20%25.2×4.1%
Advance Auto Parts AAP$2.75B-19%-1%4%19.2×5.6%
Genuine Parts GPC$16.9B+19%+5%5%15.5×7.5%

How AutoZone compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

AutoZone against its 9 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAZOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+10.5%+7.9%3rd highest of 10
6-month return-8.0%+19.6%lowest of 10
Distance from 52-week high-19.5%-12.3%3rd lowest of 10
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.4%+8.7%4th lowest of 10
Operating margin17.8%8.6%3rd highest of 10
Forward P/E19.0×22.4×4th cheapest of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.8%7.1%least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.8%+8.9%3rd lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.7 pp-3.8 pp2nd least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+21.3 pp+6.7 pp3rd highest of 9
EV / EBITDA15.0×15.3×4th cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA3.0×2.3×4th most indebted of 10
Bond spread74 bp113 bptightest of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
AutoZone AZOUnited States$51.8B-8%+7%18%19.0×-2.8%+6.8%
Alimentation Couche-Tard ATD.TOCanada$54.5B+5%+12%6%18.3×1.3%+12.0%
O’Reilly Automotive ORLYUnited States$72.3B-3%+9%20%25.2×4.1%+8.9%
Carvana CVNAUnited States$81.2B-6%+50%9%35.9×43.6%+29.5%
Williams-Sonoma WSMUnited States$29.9B+40%+2%19%25.6×15.4%+2.9%
Ulta Beauty ULTAUnited States$27.6B+24%+11%13%21.1×7.1%+15.0%
Tractor Supply TSCOUnited States$18.9B+20%+4%9%18.0×4.1%+7.9%
Wayfair WUnited States$15.3B+69%+8%2%29.6×47.7%-2.5%
Penske Automotive PAGUnited States$13.9B+22%+6%3%15.2×12.6%+9.2%
BJ's Wholesale Club BJUnited States$13.8B+18%+9%4%22.4×-0.7%+6.8%

AutoZone bonds and credit

AutoZone has 14 bonds outstanding with $8.10B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 5.33%, a spread of 74 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are AutoZone's main competitors?
Named competitors: O'Reilly Automotive (ORLY), Advance Auto Parts (AAP), Genuine Parts Company (NAPA) (GPC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.TO), O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY), Carvana (CVNA), Williams-Sonoma (WSM), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), Tractor Supply (TSCO).
Is AutoZone expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.0× against a peer median of 22.4×, 4th cheapest of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has AutoZone stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.0% against +19.6% for the median peer; over one year -12.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.