Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8022.T Mizuno CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Mizuno Corporation8022.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear

Japanese sporting goods maker known for golf clubs, baseball gear, running shoes and athletic apparel.

≈ A Japanese Wilson/New Balance hybridMomentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$2.10B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.22M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.2 pp
WACC 7.9%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥4,210
1D-8.4%
1W-2.0%
1M-1.1%
3M+14.1%
6M+27.2%
YTD+36.0%
1Y+46.0%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh9.7% off high

What Mizuno does

Japanese sporting goods maker known for golf clubs, baseball gear, running shoes and athletic apparel.

In Japan it sells much equipment through team and school orders and through sports retailers, a loyal, repeat channel that makes it slower to change prices. Overseas it positions around running shoes, while baseball gear and golf serve more specialised buyers.

In one line: A Japanese Wilson/New Balance hybrid.

Products and services

  • Golf equipment
  • Baseball/softball gear
  • Running shoes
  • Athletic apparel

Customers

  • Retail sporting goods consumers
  • Professional/amateur athletes
  • Sporting goods retailers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Sporting goods
  • Athletic equipment & apparel…

What could go right

  • Golf participation growth in Asia
  • Running shoe innovation demand

What could go wrong

  • Competition from global sporting-goods giants
  • Consumer discretionary spending sensitivity

Moat: narrow (brand, IP / patents, distribution). Century-old brand with strong loyalty in golf and baseball equipment across Japan and Asia.

Headquarters: Osaka, Japan · Founded: 1906 · Employees: 3,682

Named competitors

Mizuno at a glance

Size Mizuno (8022.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear) with a market value of $2.10B, the 464th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,210 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 27.2%, against +0.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.2%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 15.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.8× (5th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points above its cost of capital (7.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20268022.T 128Peer median 101
Six months, rebased to 100: Mizuno against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mizuno financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥267B¥259B¥240B¥230B¥212B
Revenue growth—+8%+5%+8%—
Gross profit¥113B¥105B¥95.6B¥88.2B¥78.5B
EBITDA¥28.6B¥26.5B¥24.0B¥20.6B¥15.8B
Net income¥19.5B¥18.4B¥15.2B¥14.3B¥9.91B
Free cash flown/a¥14.6B¥3.73B¥20.1B-¥12.4B
Capital expendituren/a¥3.92B¥4.11B¥2.02B¥5.28B
Total debt¥22.8B¥25.8B¥16.6B¥14.0B¥25.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mizuno competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%-10%0%+10%+20%9910UA11177081119904VSTS002563383220002832WWW0551147714401476SHOOBOSS2232081660330618368022.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mizuno is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%0×25×50×75×9910UA11177081119904VSTS002563383220002832WWW05511476SHOO33068022.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mizuno is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%-10%0%10%991081119904VSTS002563002832WWW055114771476SHOOBOSS08166033068022.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Mizuno is the large dot.

Mizuno competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (8022.T vs 7936.T vs AS vs 7906.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mizuno 8022.T$2.10B+27%+10%9%15.9×4.9%
Asics 7936.T$20.7B+10%+28%19%27.1×14.1%
Amer Sports AS$18.3B-13%+30%13%21.9×23.5%
Yonex 7906.T$1.31B-10%+15%10%14.6×n/a

How Mizuno compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mizuno against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8022.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.1%+5.1%5th lowest of 21
6-month return+27.2%+0.4%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-9.7%-22.6%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.8%+3.2%5th highest of 21
Operating margin9.2%8.9%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E15.9×12.8×5th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.9%-6.1%5th most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.5%+6.4%4th highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.6 pp-12.3 pp5th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.2 pp+6.1 pp7th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA10.7×7.6×4th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×-0.1×7th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mizuno 8022.TJapan$2.10B+27%+10%9%15.9×4.9%+11.5%
Feng Tay Enterprise 9910.TWTaiwan$2.08B0%-4%7%15.0×-5.9%+3.9%
Under Armour UAUnited States$2.23B-19%-3%1%83.9×n/an/a
Youngone 111770.KSSouth Korea$2.27B-13%+15%14%5.5×n/an/a
Goldwin 8111.TJapan$1.93B-1%+4%18%12.7×-6.3%+8.7%
Pou Chen 9904.TWTaiwan$2.29B0%-7%3%7.3×5.9%+0.1%
Vestis VSTSUnited States$1.88B+54%0%4%20.0×15.8%+1.3%
Zhejiang Semir Garment 002563.SZChina$2.42B-1%+4%7%14.8×-8.1%-0.1%
F&F 383220.KSSouth Korea$1.80B-3%+7%25%5.1×n/an/a
BIEM.L.FDLKK Garment 002832.SZChina$2.46B+42%+23%15%20.4×0.0%+13.3%
Wolverine World Wide WWWUnited States$1.75B+28%+7%9%12.1×9.1%+0.9%
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) 0551.HKHong Kong$2.75B-7%-3%3%13.6×2.4%-0.9%
Makalot Industrial 1477.TWTaiwan$1.59B+1%-2%14%12.8×-8.0%+6.7%
Star Shine 1440.HKHong Kong$2.85B+34%-33%-3%n/an/an/a
Eclat Textile 1476.TWTaiwan$2.88B+3%0%20%13.7×-8.9%+6.2%
Steven Madden SHOOUnited States$2.89B-3%+18%9%17.5×5.9%+16.1%
Hugo Boss BOSS.DEGermany$2.90B+8%-5%8%15.4×-6.6%+17.0%
Crystal International 2232.HKHong Kong$2.92B+23%+4%10%11.4×-5.3%+6.0%
Misto 081660.KSSouth Korea$1.51B-5%+8%13%6.4×-13.9%+7.4%
JNBY Design 3306.HKHong Kong$1.47B+7%+12%20%9.4×-7.4%+6.9%
Stella International 1836.HKHong Kong$1.47B-10%+2%8%11.8×-9.5%+6.8%

Questions

Who are Mizuno's main competitors?
Named competitors: ASICS Corporation (7936.T), Callaway (Topgolf Callaway) (private or unlisted), Wilson (Amer Sports) (AS), Yonex (7906.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Feng Tay Enterprise (9910.TW), Under Armour (UA), Youngone (111770.KS), Goldwin (8111.T), Pou Chen (9904.TW), Vestis (VSTS).
Is Mizuno expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.9× against a peer median of 12.8×, 5th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Mizuno stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +27.2% against +0.4% for the median peer; over one year +46.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.