Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9910.TW Feng Tay Enterprise Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Feng Tay Enterprise Co., Ltd.9910.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear

Major contract footwear manufacturer and one of Nike's largest and longest-standing production partners.

≈ A Nike-focused peer of Pou ChenMomentum leader 81
Mkt cap
$2.08B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
73%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.68M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+11.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · TWDNT$69.60
1D+0.6%
1W-0.3%
1M+4.3%
3M+3.3%
6M+0.4%
YTD-40.3%
1Y-45.8%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh47.7% off high

What Feng Tay Enterprise does

Major contract footwear manufacturer and one of Nike's largest and longest-standing production partners.

Makes shoes to Nike's designs and specifications and sells none under its own name, so orders follow Nike's seasonal programmes and the share of Nike's production it is given. Its plants are outside Taiwan, mostly in Asia.

In one line: A Nike-focused peer of Pou Chen.

Products and services

  • Athletic footwear manufacturing

Customers

  • Nike

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Footwear manufacturing
  • Contract shoe production

What could go right

  • Nike volume growth/order share gains

What could go wrong

  • Extreme customer concentration in Nike
  • Labor-cost inflation

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, scale). Decades-long, heavily concentrated manufacturing relationship with Nike.

Headquarters: Changhua, Taiwan

Named competitors

Feng Tay Enterprise at a glance

Size Feng Tay Enterprise (9910.TW) is a Taiwan Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear) with a market value of $2.08B, the 165th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$69.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.4%, against +0.7% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.1%); the operating margin is 6.9% (peer median 9.1%).

Valuation It trades at 15.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.8× (7th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269910.TW 101Peer median 101
Six months, rebased to 100: Feng Tay Enterprise against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Feng Tay Enterprise financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$82.0BNT$83.5BNT$87.5BNT$85.8BNT$95.9B
Revenue growth—-5%+2%-11%—
Gross profitNT$15.7BNT$17.7BNT$18.8BNT$16.9BNT$22.6B
EBITDANT$8.75BNT$10.5BNT$10.6BNT$9.56BNT$14.2B
Net incomeNT$4.86BNT$5.04BNT$5.87BNT$4.97BNT$9.08B
Free cash flowNT$4.87BNT$5.69BNT$5.16BNT$3.20BNT$12.3B
Capital expenditureNT$2.60BNT$3.12BNT$3.16BNT$4.46BNT$4.99B
Total debtNT$4.96BNT$6.43BNT$7.00BNT$6.31BNT$3.55B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Feng Tay Enterprise competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%-10%0%+10%+20%8022UA81111117709904VSTS383220002563002832WWW1477055114400816601476SHOOBOSS2232330618369910.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Feng Tay Enterprise is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%0×25×50×75×8022UA81111117709904VSTS38322000283214770551081660SHOO330618369910.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Feng Tay Enterprise is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%-10%0%10%802281119904VSTS002563002832WWW147705510816601476SHOOBOSS33069910.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Feng Tay Enterprise is the large dot.

Feng Tay Enterprise competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9910.TW vs 9904.TW vs 0551.HK vs 1476.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Feng Tay Enterprise 9910.TW$2.08B0%-4%7%15.0×-5.9%
Pou Chen 9904.TW$2.29B0%-7%3%7.3×5.9%
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) 0551.HK$2.75B-7%-3%3%13.6×2.4%
Eclat Textile 1476.TW$2.88B+3%0%20%13.7×-8.9%

How Feng Tay Enterprise compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Feng Tay Enterprise against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9910.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.3%+4.7%11th highest of 21
6-month return+0.4%+0.7%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-47.7%-20.6%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.3%+4.1%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.9%9.1%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E15.0×12.8×7th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.9%-5.8%9th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.9%+6.7%6th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.8 pp-12.3 pp7th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+11.1 pp+5.6 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.2×8.2×9th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×-0.4×9th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Feng Tay Enterprise 9910.TWTaiwan$2.08B0%-4%7%15.0×-5.9%+3.9%
Mizuno 8022.TJapan$2.10B+27%+10%9%15.9×4.9%+11.5%
Under Armour UAUnited States$2.23B-19%-3%1%83.9×n/an/a
Goldwin 8111.TJapan$1.93B-1%+4%18%12.7×-6.3%+8.7%
Youngone 111770.KSSouth Korea$2.27B-13%+15%14%5.5×n/an/a
Pou Chen 9904.TWTaiwan$2.29B0%-7%3%7.3×5.9%+0.1%
Vestis VSTSUnited States$1.88B+54%0%4%20.0×15.8%+1.3%
F&F 383220.KSSouth Korea$1.80B-3%+7%25%5.1×n/an/a
Zhejiang Semir Garment 002563.SZChina$2.42B-1%+4%7%14.8×-8.1%-0.1%
BIEM.L.FDLKK Garment 002832.SZChina$2.46B+42%+23%15%20.4×0.0%+13.3%
Wolverine World Wide WWWUnited States$1.75B+28%+7%9%12.1×9.1%+0.9%
Makalot Industrial 1477.TWTaiwan$1.59B+1%-2%14%12.8×-8.0%+6.7%
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) 0551.HKHong Kong$2.75B-7%-3%3%13.6×2.4%-0.9%
Star Shine 1440.HKHong Kong$2.85B+34%-33%-3%n/an/an/a
Misto 081660.KSSouth Korea$1.51B-5%+8%13%6.4×-13.9%+7.4%
Eclat Textile 1476.TWTaiwan$2.88B+3%0%20%13.7×-8.9%+6.2%
Steven Madden SHOOUnited States$2.89B-3%+18%9%17.5×5.9%+16.1%
Hugo Boss BOSS.DEGermany$2.90B+8%-5%8%15.4×-6.6%+17.0%
Crystal International 2232.HKHong Kong$2.92B+23%+4%10%11.4×-5.3%+6.0%
JNBY Design 3306.HKHong Kong$1.47B+7%+12%20%9.4×-7.4%+6.9%
Stella International 1836.HKHong Kong$1.47B-10%+2%8%11.8×-9.5%+6.8%

Questions

Who are Feng Tay Enterprise's main competitors?
Named competitors: Pou Chen Corporation (9904.TW), Yue Yuen Industrial (0551.HK), Eclat Textile (1476.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Mizuno (8022.T), Under Armour (UA), Goldwin (8111.T), Youngone (111770.KS), Pou Chen (9904.TW), Vestis (VSTS).
Is Feng Tay Enterprise expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.0× against a peer median of 12.8×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Feng Tay Enterprise stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.4% against +0.7% for the median peer; over one year -45.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.