Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5LY.SI Marco Polo Marine Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Marco Polo Marine Ltd.5LY.SICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Singapore · SGD·Industrials›Marine Shipping
Momentum laggard 17
Mkt cap
$322M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.21M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.8 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-37 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
20 days
26 Nov 2026
Close · SGDS$0.10
1D-2.8%
1W-3.7%
1M-11.0%
3M-22.2%
6M-36.0%
YTD-37.5%
1Y+2.9%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh46.7% off high

What Marco Polo Marine does

Employees: 974

Marco Polo Marine at a glance

Size Marco Polo Marine (5LY.SI) is a Singapore Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $322M, the 135th largest of 186 Singapore companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at S$0.10 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 36.0%, against -11.8% for the median peer and -1.2% for the Singapore market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 25.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.8%); the operating margin is 31.6% (peer median 11.2%).

Valuation It trades at 11.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 7.4× (4th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +32%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.8 points above its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 885LY.SI 56
Six months, rebased to 100: Marco Polo Marine against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Marco Polo Marine financials

Reported figures in SGD; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueS$144MS$123MS$124MS$127MS$86.1M
Revenue growth—-1%-3%+48%—
Gross profitS$64.0MS$52.5MS$48.5MS$45.7MS$27.5M
EBITDAS$64.3MS$52.1MS$45.4MS$48.3MS$29.3M
Net incomeS$59.5MS$58.5MS$21.7MS$22.6MS$21.3M
Free cash flowS$29.8M-S$29.0M-S$23.3M-S$2.78MS$24.6M
Capital expenditureS$58.3MS$70.3MS$61.9MS$32.4MS$4.59M
Total debtn/aS$48.1MS$40.3MS$8.54MS$3.76M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Marco Polo Marine competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-15%-10%-5%249026129308SHIPFSJ001205S5626172409SEA1ESEA005880CMDB9324PANL2605600798GOTL-A77865LY.SI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Marco Polo Marine is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×20×40×60×2612SHIPFSJ00120526172409SEA1ESEA005880PANL2605GOTL-A77865LY.SIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Marco Polo Marine is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%9308SHIPFSJ001205S56261724090058809324PANL26056007985LY.SIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Marco Polo Marine is the large dot.

Marco Polo Marine competitors and peer comparison

How Marco Polo Marine compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Marco Polo Marine against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5LY.SIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.0%-10.5%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-36.0%-11.8%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-46.7%-28.1%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+25.7%+7.8%7th highest of 20
Operating margin31.6%11.2%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.7×7.4×4th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.4%-2.5%7th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+31.8%+10.7%highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-37.3 pp-15.2 ppleast demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.8 pp-0.6 pp4th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA6.1×6.6×9th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×1.6×5th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Marco Polo Marine 5LY.SISingapore$322M-36%+26%32%11.7×-5.4%+31.8%
LC Logistics 2490.HKHong Kong$316M-13%-9%1%n/an/an/a
Chinese Maritime Transport 2612.TWTaiwan$329M-1%+2%25%8.5×n/an/a
Inui Global Logistics 9308.TJapan$331M+37%+21%9%n/a7.2%+12.2%
Seanergy Maritime SHIPUnited States$306M-15%+32%37%4.9×-2.5%+20.1%
James Fisher and Sons FSJ.LUnited Kingdom$302M-11%-2%6%21.8×9.5%-5.3%
Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping 001205.SZChina$350M-18%+2%16%15.3×2.6%+24.6%
Samudera Shipping Line S56.SISingapore$365M-16%+4%11%n/a-15.6%+10.5%
Taiwan Navigation 2617.TWTaiwan$368M-1%+8%40%6.5×-7.9%+11.5%
Seacon Shipping 2409.HKHong Kong$400M+32%+40%11%6.2×4.8%+12.7%
Sea1 Offshore Incorporation SEA1.OLNorway$406M-12%-23%36%4.9×n/an/a
Euroseas ESEAUnited States$417M-13%+3%59%3.4×n/an/a
Korea Line 005880.KSSouth Korea$420M-30%-19%21%2.9×-12.2%+7.6%
Costamare Bulkers CMDBUnited States$449M-4%n/a-3%n/a-7.8%n/a
Yasuda Logistics 9324.TJapan$453M+12%+2%5%n/a12.3%+10.9%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions PANLUnited States$496M-3%+22%9%7.4×1.6%+10.5%
Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) 000520.SZChina$527M-12%+78%5%n/an/an/a
Sincere Navigation 2605.TWTaiwan$548M-11%+22%31%8.9×-18.5%+2.3%
Ningbo Marine 600798.SSChina$575M-12%+39%3%n/a-7.5%+3.5%
Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland GOTL-A.STSweden$582M-16%+42%1%66.5×n/an/a
Dong Fang Offshore 7786.TWTaiwan$583M-19%+52%19%11.4×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Marco Polo Marine's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: LC Logistics (2490.HK), Chinese Maritime Transport (2612.TW), Inui Global Logistics (9308.T), Seanergy Maritime (SHIP), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ.L), Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping (001205.SZ), Samudera Shipping Line (S56.SI), Taiwan Navigation (2617.TW).
Is Marco Polo Marine expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.7× against a peer median of 7.4×, 4th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +32%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Marco Polo Marine stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -36.0% against -11.8% for the median peer; over one year +2.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.