Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2612.TW Chinese Maritime Transport Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Chinese Maritime Transport Ltd.2612.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Marine Shipping
Momentum strong 72
Mkt cap
$329M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$693,741
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$55.10
1D-5.0%
1W-11.3%
1M-10.6%
3M+3.6%
6M-1.1%
YTD-7.2%
1Y-2.8%
ATR %3.5%
52w lowhigh29.9% off high

What Chinese Maritime Transport does

No business profile yet.

Chinese Maritime Transport at a glance

Size Chinese Maritime Transport (2612.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $329M, the 617th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$55.10 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.1%, against -12.3% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.7%); the operating margin is 24.6% (peer median 11.2%).

Valuation It trades at 8.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 7.4× (7th most expensive of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262612.TW 96Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Chinese Maritime Transport against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Chinese Maritime Transport financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$5.02BNT$4.89BNT$4.64BNT$4.01BNT$4.41B
Revenue growth—+5%+16%-9%—
Gross profitNT$1.71BNT$1.56BNT$1.15BNT$826MNT$1.36B
EBITDANT$2.51BNT$2.40BNT$2.06BNT$1.55BNT$1.91B
Net incomeNT$1.02BNT$1.08BNT$1.01BNT$328MNT$766M
Free cash flow-NT$1.37B-NT$618M-NT$2.05B-NT$1.90BNT$549M
Capital expenditureNT$3.41BNT$2.85BNT$4.00BNT$3.23BNT$1.43B
Total debtNT$13.0BNT$11.6BNT$12.6BNT$10.7BNT$7.70B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Chinese Maritime Transport competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-15%-10%-5%93085LY2490001205SHIPFSJS5626172409SEA1ESEA005880CMDB9324PANL2605600798GOTL-A77862612.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Chinese Maritime Transport is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×20×40×60×5LY001205SHIPFSJ26172409SEA1ESEA005880PANL2605GOTL-A77862612.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Chinese Maritime Transport is the large dot.

Chinese Maritime Transport competitors and peer comparison

How Chinese Maritime Transport compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Chinese Maritime Transport against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2612.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.6%-10.8%11th highest of 21
6-month return-1.1%-12.3%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-29.9%-28.1%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.5%+20.7%5th lowest of 20
Operating margin24.6%11.2%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.5×7.4×7th most expensive of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.8 pp-0.5 pp8th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA8.2×6.0×7th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA3.9×1.5×3rd most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Chinese Maritime Transport 2612.TWTaiwan$329M-1%+2%25%8.5×n/an/a
Inui Global Logistics 9308.TJapan$331M+37%+21%9%n/a7.2%+12.2%
Marco Polo Marine 5LY.SISingapore$322M-36%+26%32%11.7×-5.4%+31.8%
LC Logistics 2490.HKHong Kong$316M-13%-9%1%n/an/an/a
Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping 001205.SZChina$350M-18%+2%16%15.3×2.6%+24.6%
Seanergy Maritime SHIPUnited States$306M-15%+32%37%4.9×-2.5%+20.1%
James Fisher and Sons FSJ.LUnited Kingdom$302M-11%-2%6%21.8×9.5%-5.3%
Samudera Shipping Line S56.SISingapore$365M-16%+4%11%n/a-15.6%+10.5%
Taiwan Navigation 2617.TWTaiwan$368M-1%+8%40%6.5×-7.9%+11.5%
Seacon Shipping 2409.HKHong Kong$400M+32%+40%11%6.2×4.8%+12.7%
Sea1 Offshore Incorporation SEA1.OLNorway$406M-12%-23%36%4.9×n/an/a
Euroseas ESEAUnited States$417M-13%+3%59%3.4×n/an/a
Korea Line 005880.KSSouth Korea$420M-30%-19%21%2.9×-12.2%+7.6%
Costamare Bulkers CMDBUnited States$449M-4%n/a-3%n/a-7.8%n/a
Yasuda Logistics 9324.TJapan$453M+12%+2%5%n/a12.3%+10.9%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions PANLUnited States$496M-3%+22%9%7.4×1.6%+10.5%
Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) 000520.SZChina$527M-12%+78%5%n/an/an/a
Sincere Navigation 2605.TWTaiwan$548M-11%+22%31%8.9×-18.5%+2.3%
Ningbo Marine 600798.SSChina$575M-12%+39%3%n/a-7.5%+3.5%
Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland GOTL-A.STSweden$582M-16%+42%1%66.5×n/an/a
Dong Fang Offshore 7786.TWTaiwan$583M-19%+52%19%11.4×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Chinese Maritime Transport's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Inui Global Logistics (9308.T), Marco Polo Marine (5LY.SI), LC Logistics (2490.HK), Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping (001205.SZ), Seanergy Maritime (SHIP), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ.L), Samudera Shipping Line (S56.SI), Taiwan Navigation (2617.TW).
Is Chinese Maritime Transport expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.5× against a peer median of 7.4×, 7th most expensive of 14 in its peer set.
How has Chinese Maritime Transport stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.1% against -12.3% for the median peer; over one year -2.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.