Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000520.SZ Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Class A000520.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Marine Shipping
Momentum neutral 50
Mkt cap
$527M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+8.4 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥3.47
1D-2.0%
1W-0.9%
1M-14.3%
3M-8.4%
6M-12.2%
YTD-28.3%
1Y-26.0%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh35.0% off high

What Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) does

Employees: 89

Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) at a glance

Size Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) (000520.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $527M, the 3735th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.47 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 12.2%, against -4.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 77.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.7%); the operating margin is 4.6% (peer median 19.5%).

Valuation It trades at 2.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (6th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.4 points above its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 96000520.SZ 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.21BCN¥754MCN¥886MCN¥1.01BCN¥1.04B
Revenue growth—-15%-12%-3%—
Gross profitCN¥103MCN¥44.7M-CN¥10.7MCN¥16.5MCN¥89.6M
EBITDAn/aCN¥35.5M-CN¥24.8MCN¥9.89MCN¥64.0M
Net incomeCN¥59.1M-CN¥43.9M-CN¥82.7M-CN¥8.70MCN¥36.2M
Free cash flow-CN¥10.7MCN¥32.3MCN¥34.4M-CN¥53.2MCN¥89.8M
Capital expenditureCN¥90.3MCN¥3.31MCN¥6.29MCN¥1.30MCN¥314,375
Total debtCN¥40.5MCN¥48.9MCN¥42.7MCN¥67.9MCN¥70.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-15%-10%-5%2605PANL600798GOTL-A7786603209SOFF9324CMDB005880KCCESEA2409HSHP2617S56001205SB9308000520.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×2.5×5×7.5×2605PANL600798GOTL-A7786603209SOFF9324005880KCCESEA2409HSHP2617S56001205SB000520.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) is the large dot.

Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) competitors and peer comparison

How Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000520.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.3%-9.8%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-12.2%-4.5%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-35.0%-22.9%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+77.7%+20.7%highest of 20
Operating margin4.6%19.5%4th lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.8×1.9×6th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.4 pp-0.5 pp3rd highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) 000520.SZChina$527M-12%+78%5%2.8×n/an/a
Sincere Navigation 2605.TWTaiwan$548M-11%+22%31%1.9×-18.5%+2.3%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions PANLUnited States$496M-3%+22%9%1.1×1.6%+10.5%
Ningbo Marine 600798.SSChina$575M-12%+39%3%1.2×-7.5%+3.5%
Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland GOTL-A.STSweden$582M-16%+42%1%0.7×n/an/a
Dong Fang Offshore 7786.TWTaiwan$583M-19%+52%19%1.9×n/an/a
Xingtong Shipping 603209.SSChina$603M-5%+28%25%2.8×n/an/a
Solstad Offshore SOFF.OLNorway$606M+4%+21%31%3.3×3.4%-9.1%
Yasuda Logistics 9324.TJapan$453M+12%+2%5%1.6×12.3%+10.9%
Costamare Bulkers CMDBUnited States$449M-4%n/a-3%0.6×-7.8%n/a
Korea Line 005880.KSSouth Korea$420M-30%-19%21%1.6×-12.2%+7.6%
Klaveness Combination Carriers KCC.OLNorway$661M0%+21%26%3.0×n/an/a
Euroseas ESEAUnited States$417M-13%+3%59%1.9×n/an/a
Sea1 Offshore Incorporation SEA1.OLNorway$406M-12%-23%36%n/an/an/a
Seacon Shipping 2409.HKHong Kong$400M+32%+40%11%2.4×4.8%+12.7%
Himalaya Shipping HSHP.OLNorway$729M-2%+36%61%7.9×-3.3%+36.0%
Taiwan Navigation 2617.TWTaiwan$368M-1%+8%40%3.6×-7.9%+11.5%
Samudera Shipping Line S56.SISingapore$365M-16%+4%11%0.6×-15.6%+10.5%
Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping 001205.SZChina$350M-18%+2%16%2.8×2.6%+24.6%
Safe Bulkers SBUnited States$809M+1%+11%33%3.9×3.6%+6.8%
Inui Global Logistics 9308.TJapan$331M+37%+21%9%1.7×7.2%+12.2%

Questions

Which companies are Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan)'s closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sincere Navigation (2605.TW), Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL), Ningbo Marine (600798.SS), Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland (GOTL-A.ST), Dong Fang Offshore (7786.TW), Xingtong Shipping (603209.SS), Solstad Offshore (SOFF.OL), Yasuda Logistics (9324.T).
Is Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.8× against a peer median of 1.9×, 6th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -12.2% against -4.5% for the median peer; over one year -26.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.