Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603209.SS Xingtong Shipping Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Xingtong Shipping Co., Ltd. Class A603209.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Marine Shipping
Momentum leader 80
Mkt cap
$603M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
28%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
173 days
28 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥14.19
1D-2.0%
1W-2.1%
1M-6.2%
3M+3.7%
6M-4.6%
YTD-6.3%
1Y-4.7%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh21.7% off high

What Xingtong Shipping does

Employees: 822

Xingtong Shipping at a glance

Size Xingtong Shipping (603209.SS) is a China Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $603M, the 3402nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥14.19 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 4.6%, against -2.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 28.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +21.4%); the operating margin is 25.2% (peer median 19.5%).

Valuation It trades at 11.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 7.4× (4th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.9 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 99603209.SS 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Xingtong Shipping against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Xingtong Shipping financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.97BCN¥1.62BCN¥1.51BCN¥1.24BCN¥785M
Revenue growth—+7%+22%+57%—
Gross profitCN¥802MCN¥455MCN¥534MCN¥404MCN¥325M
EBITDAn/aCN¥610MCN¥646MCN¥506MCN¥341M
Net incomeCN¥384MCN¥270MCN¥350MCN¥252MCN¥206M
Free cash flow-CN¥450M-CN¥287M-CN¥145M-CN¥488M-CN¥657M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.05BCN¥794MCN¥703MCN¥1.00BCN¥907M
Total debtCN¥2.11BCN¥1.50BCN¥1.32BCN¥1.13BCN¥792M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Xingtong Shipping competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%SOFF7786GOTL-A600798KCC2605000520HSHPPANL9324SBCMDBALCGPPL005880ESEA26072409ODF603209.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Xingtong Shipping is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×20×40×60×SOFF7786GOTL-AKCC2605HSHPSBALCGPPL005880ESEASEA12409ODF603209.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Xingtong Shipping is the large dot.

Xingtong Shipping competitors and peer comparison

How Xingtong Shipping compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Xingtong Shipping against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603209.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.2%-10.9%8th highest of 21
6-month return-4.6%-2.7%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.7%-21.3%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+28.3%+21.4%7th highest of 20
Operating margin25.2%19.5%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.4×7.4×4th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.9 pp+0.9 pp7th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Xingtong Shipping 603209.SSChina$603M-5%+28%25%11.4×n/an/a
Solstad Offshore SOFF.OLNorway$606M+4%+21%31%6.8×3.4%-9.1%
Dong Fang Offshore 7786.TWTaiwan$583M-19%+52%19%11.4×n/an/a
Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland GOTL-A.STSweden$582M-16%+42%1%66.5×n/an/a
Ningbo Marine 600798.SSChina$575M-12%+39%3%n/a-7.5%+3.5%
Klaveness Combination Carriers KCC.OLNorway$661M0%+21%26%5.8×n/an/a
Sincere Navigation 2605.TWTaiwan$548M-11%+22%31%8.9×-18.5%+2.3%
Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) 000520.SZChina$527M-12%+78%5%n/an/an/a
Himalaya Shipping HSHP.OLNorway$729M-2%+36%61%7.5×-3.3%+36.0%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions PANLUnited States$496M-3%+22%9%7.4×1.6%+10.5%
Yasuda Logistics 9324.TJapan$453M+12%+2%5%n/a12.3%+10.9%
Safe Bulkers SBUnited States$809M+1%+11%33%9.4×3.6%+6.8%
Costamare Bulkers CMDBUnited States$449M-4%n/a-3%n/a-7.8%n/a
Algoma Central ALC.TOCanada$846M+30%+18%34%13.6×n/an/a
Gujarat Pipavav Port GPPL.NSIndia$851M+4%+25%52%14.7×16.2%+9.6%
Korea Line 005880.KSSouth Korea$420M-30%-19%21%2.9×-12.2%+7.6%
Euroseas ESEAUnited States$417M-13%+3%59%3.4×n/an/a
Sea1 Offshore Incorporation SEA1.OLNorway$406M-12%-23%36%4.9×n/an/a
Evergreen International Storage & Transport 2607.TWTaiwan$897M+18%-15%11%n/an/an/a
Seacon Shipping 2409.HKHong Kong$400M+32%+40%11%6.2×4.8%+12.7%
Odfjell ODF.OLNorway$960M+3%-10%18%6.9×-12.7%+5.6%

Questions

Which companies are Xingtong Shipping's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Solstad Offshore (SOFF.OL), Dong Fang Offshore (7786.TW), Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland (GOTL-A.ST), Ningbo Marine (600798.SS), Klaveness Combination Carriers (KCC.OL), Sincere Navigation (2605.TW), Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) (000520.SZ), Himalaya Shipping (HSHP.OL).
Is Xingtong Shipping expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.4× against a peer median of 7.4×, 4th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Xingtong Shipping stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -4.6% against -2.7% for the median peer; over one year -4.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.