Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2490.HK LC Logistics, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

LC Logistics, Inc.2490.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Industrials›Marine Shipping
Momentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$316M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
48%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$217,442
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-9.0 pp
WACC 10.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · HKDHK$4.04
1D-0.1%
1W+2.1%
1M-1.8%
3M-15.6%
6M-12.7%
YTD-9.3%
1Y-38.2%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh43.4% off high

What LC Logistics does

Employees: 331

LC Logistics at a glance

Size LC Logistics (2490.HK) is a Hong Kong Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $316M, the 877th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$4.04 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 12.7%, against -11.8% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 8.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.7%); the operating margin is 0.9% (peer median 13.4%).

Valuation It trades at 1.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (5th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.0 points below its cost of capital (10.0% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 882490.HK 81
Six months, rebased to 100: LC Logistics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

LC Logistics financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$2.07BHK$2.03BHK$2.11BHK$1.37BHK$5.36B
Revenue growth—-4%+54%-74%—
Gross profitHK$168MHK$190MHK$228MHK$250MHK$625M
EBITDAHK$108MHK$183MHK$146MHK$186MHK$547M
Net incomeHK$211MHK$150MHK$429MHK$131MHK$443M
Free cash flow-HK$574M-HK$219M-HK$415M-HK$303M-HK$46.0M
Capital expenditureHK$746MHK$412MHK$499MHK$345MHK$722M
Total debtn/aHK$106MHK$177MHK$63.9MHK$84.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

LC Logistics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-15%-10%-5%5LYSHIP26129308FSJ001205S5626172409SEA1ESEA005880CMDB9324PANL2605600798GOTL-A77862490.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. LC Logistics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%2×4×5LYSHIP26129308FSJ001205S5626172409ESEA0058809324PANL0005202605600798GOTL-A77862490.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. LC Logistics is the large dot.

LC Logistics competitors and peer comparison

How LC Logistics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

LC Logistics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2490.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.8%-10.8%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-12.7%-11.8%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.4%-28.1%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-8.7%+20.7%3rd lowest of 20
Operating margin0.9%13.4%3rd lowest of 21
EV / Sales1.0×1.9×5th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.0 pp-0.5 pp2nd lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA19.6×6.0×most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-4.2×1.6×2nd least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
LC Logistics 2490.HKHong Kong$316M-13%-9%1%1.0×n/an/a
Marco Polo Marine 5LY.SISingapore$322M-36%+26%32%2.7×-5.4%+31.8%
Seanergy Maritime SHIPUnited States$306M-15%+32%37%2.8×-2.5%+20.1%
Chinese Maritime Transport 2612.TWTaiwan$329M-1%+2%25%4.1×n/an/a
Inui Global Logistics 9308.TJapan$331M+37%+21%9%1.7×7.2%+12.2%
James Fisher and Sons FSJ.LUnited Kingdom$302M-11%-2%6%1.0×9.5%-5.3%
Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping 001205.SZChina$350M-18%+2%16%2.8×2.6%+24.6%
Samudera Shipping Line S56.SISingapore$365M-16%+4%11%0.6×-15.6%+10.5%
Taiwan Navigation 2617.TWTaiwan$368M-1%+8%40%3.6×-7.9%+11.5%
Seacon Shipping 2409.HKHong Kong$400M+32%+40%11%2.4×4.8%+12.7%
Sea1 Offshore Incorporation SEA1.OLNorway$406M-12%-23%36%n/an/an/a
Euroseas ESEAUnited States$417M-13%+3%59%1.9×n/an/a
Korea Line 005880.KSSouth Korea$420M-30%-19%21%1.6×-12.2%+7.6%
Costamare Bulkers CMDBUnited States$449M-4%n/a-3%0.6×-7.8%n/a
Yasuda Logistics 9324.TJapan$453M+12%+2%5%1.6×12.3%+10.9%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions PANLUnited States$496M-3%+22%9%1.1×1.6%+10.5%
Phoenix Shipping (Wuhan) 000520.SZChina$527M-12%+78%5%2.8×n/an/a
Sincere Navigation 2605.TWTaiwan$548M-11%+22%31%1.9×-18.5%+2.3%
Ningbo Marine 600798.SSChina$575M-12%+39%3%1.2×-7.5%+3.5%
Rederiaktiebolaget Gotland GOTL-A.STSweden$582M-16%+42%1%0.7×n/an/a
Dong Fang Offshore 7786.TWTaiwan$583M-19%+52%19%1.9×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are LC Logistics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Marco Polo Marine (5LY.SI), Seanergy Maritime (SHIP), Chinese Maritime Transport (2612.TW), Inui Global Logistics (9308.T), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ.L), Nanjing Sheng Hang Shipping (001205.SZ), Samudera Shipping Line (S56.SI), Taiwan Navigation (2617.TW).
Is LC Logistics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.0× against a peer median of 1.9×, 5th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has LC Logistics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -12.7% against -11.8% for the median peer; over one year -38.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.