Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4661.T Oriental Land CoOpen in the cockpit ↗

Oriental Land Co4661.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Movies/Entertainment

Operates Tokyo Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea theme parks under license from Disney.

≈ Japan's Disney theme-park licensee, the operating company rather than the IP ownerMomentum leader 97
Mkt cap
$36.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$120M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
41.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-24 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥3,529
1D-4.9%
1W+11.3%
1M+24.3%
3M+14.3%
6M+61.2%
YTD+22.1%
1Y-0.7%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh5.6% off high

What Oriental Land does

Operates Tokyo Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea theme parks under license from Disney.

Earns from admission tickets, merchandise, food and its on-site hotels, and pays Disney a licence fee for the characters and park designs rather than owning them. Keisei Electric Railway is its largest shareholder. The 2024 opening of the Fantasy Springs area at DisneySea added capacity for more visitors.

In one line: Japan's Disney theme-park licensee, the operating company rather than the IP owner.

Products and services

  • Theme parks (Tokyo Disneyland, DisneySea)
  • Hotels
  • Merchandise/retail and dining

Customers

  • Domestic and international tourists visiting Tokyo

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Leisure/entertainment
  • Theme park operation
  • Theme parks, hotels, retail/merchandise

What could go right

  • Inbound tourism growth to Japan
  • Pricing power on tickets/attendance

What could go wrong

  • Licensing-fee dependence on the Disney relationship
  • Natural disaster/pandemic disruption risk

Moat: wide (brand, regulatory licence, scale). Exclusive long-term license to operate Disney parks in the Tokyo region, an irreplaceable brand/location combination.

Headquarters: Urayasu, Chiba, Japan · Founded: 1960 · Employees: 11,207

Named competitors

Oriental Land at a glance

Size Oriental Land (4661.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $36.7B, the 42nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,529 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 61.2%, against +26.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.6%); the operating margin is 24.2% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 41.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.3× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +33%, so the hurdle is -24 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20264661.T 159Peer median 126
Six months, rebased to 100: Oriental Land against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Oriental Land financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥737B¥705B¥679B¥618B¥483B
Revenue growth—+4%+10%+28%—
Gross profit¥337B¥273B¥273B¥250B¥186B
EBITDAn/a¥235B¥238B¥212B¥158B
Net income¥135B¥122B¥124B¥120B¥80.7B
Free cash flown/a¥104B¥95.3B¥149B¥79.2B
Capital expendituren/a¥83.6B¥103B¥52.7B¥93.2B
Total debt¥306B¥327B¥267B¥209B¥241B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Oriental Land competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%+10%+20%69025108726772695802783282677936745319287270755098437309340272728136725972024661.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Oriental Land is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%10×20×30×40×690251087267726958027832468982677936745319287270755098437309340272728136725972024661.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Oriental Land is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%69025108726772695802783282677936745319287550984373097272813672594661.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Oriental Land is the large dot.

Oriental Land competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (4661.T vs DIS vs CMCSA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Oriental Land 4661.T$36.7B+61%+6%24%41.9×9.3%
Walt Disney Company (The) DIS$202B+9%+5%15%15.4×14.2%
Comcast CMCSA$86.6B-3%0%15%7.2×-6.4%

How Oriental Land compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Oriental Land against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4661.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+24.3%+6.0%highest of 21
6-month return+61.2%+26.8%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-5.6%-10.4%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.6%+7.6%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin24.2%8.8%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E41.9×15.3×2nd most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.3%3.4%5th most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+32.8%+11.1%2nd highest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-23.5 pp-7.3 pp2nd least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.1 pp-0.4 pp5th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Oriental Land 4661.TJapan$36.7B+61%+6%24%41.9×9.3%+32.8%
Denso 6902.TJapan$32.5B-1%+7%7%12.1×3.4%+8.8%
Bridgestone 5108.TJapan$31.7B+28%+6%12%14.0×-1.9%+10.4%
Honda Motor 7267.TJapan$45.2B+45%+4%-1%11.7×18.2%+10.6%
Suzuki Motor 7269.TJapan$27.3B+26%+14%9%9.1×-0.8%+14.6%
Sumitomo Electric Industries 5802.TJapan$27.3B-47%+14%9%11.4×13.3%+11.9%
Bandai Namco 7832.TJapan$26.1B+76%+9%15%25.5×-0.4%+12.7%
Ly Corporation 4689.TJapan$23.2B+31%+8%15%18.5×0.8%+11.0%
Aeon 8267.TJapan$21.4B-19%+11%2%51.1×3.5%+4.5%
Asics 7936.TJapan$20.7B+10%+28%19%27.1×14.1%+19.8%
Ryohin Keikaku 7453.TJapan$16.4B+31%+18%11%32.4×9.5%+15.3%
Sekisui House 1928.TJapan$14.1B+2%-2%9%10.0×-5.1%+11.4%
Subaru 7270.TJapan$12.3B+16%0%3%12.0×2.7%+11.1%
Zensho 7550.TJapan$12.2B+41%+12%7%34.3×6.1%+16.3%
Nitori 9843.TJapan$11.7B+47%0%13%20.0×2.7%+4.9%
Shimano 7309.TJapan$11.5B+29%+5%12%35.8×6.0%+4.3%
Toray Industries 3402.TJapan$11.1B+6%+6%6%16.6×5.5%+6.5%
Yamaha Motor 7272.TJapan$10.1B+54%+10%6%9.3×4.2%+11.5%
Sanrio 8136.TJapan$9.78B+33%+28%39%22.4×1.9%+36.4%
Aisin 7259.TJapan$9.78B-14%+6%4%10.0×-0.3%+7.7%
Isuzu Motors 7202.TJapan$9.26B-1%+5%6%8.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Oriental Land's main competitors?
Named competitors: Walt Disney Company (DIS), Comcast (Universal parks) (CMCSA). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Denso (6902.T), Bridgestone (5108.T), Honda Motor (7267.T), Suzuki Motor (7269.T), Sumitomo Electric Industries (5802.T), Bandai Namco (7832.T).
Is Oriental Land expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 41.9× against a peer median of 15.3×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +33%, so the hurdle is -24 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Oriental Land stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +61.2% against +26.8% for the median peer; over one year -0.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.